woolybug25
#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
- Messages
- 17,677
- Reaction score
- 3,018
Why did I think you were 18 or something? Crazy.
I don't mean this as an insult, so don't take it that way. But you're pretty young, right?
I'm just assuming that you never got to see Joe Montana in his prime or Dan Marino, etc?
It's interesting how different generations see the Mt Rushmore of NFL QB's.
I don't understand system quarterback . I'm a homer huge I admit but if Brady is a system quarterback then why isn't every one in that system ? Honestly his winning percentage is just incredible and if the NFL is copy cat league which it is then why aren't there 30 Brady's . I think the main reason I pick Brady over Manning is Brady is effective in any conditions snow ,rain, cold, indoor or outdoor . Manning is great I fully admit but outdoors in January is where the most important football is usually played and if your that's where your the least effective then your not the best . That and I'm a huge homer.
He's won several games just this season in cold weather.
Just asking, but is it cold weather or wind or both? I have never been too impressed with Manning's velocity or overall arm strength, but his IQ and ball placement are top notch. I seem to think his lack of zip (which is getting worse due to age) has more to do with his performances than anything else, when all else is close to equal.
He's won several games just this season in cold weather.
He has won several cold weather regular season games I agree . Beating elite teams in cold is what makes a great playoff quarterback . If your not great playoff quarterback your not greatest ever i'm sorry .
Both. Denver is extremely windy and a couple of his games this season have been unseasonably cold.
I would agree with the arm strength comment. That being said, I don't think Brady has a rocket either. In fact, a lot of great QB's lacked in this department. Seems now more than ever, its about above the shoulders.
I don't understand system quarterback .
I'm a huge homer
I keep hearing this argument, but Peyton won a Super Bowl in the pouring rain in January. He played 15 of his games last year outside and 9 games this season outside. These are two of his best seasons of his career. The argument just doesn't make sense to me.
Also... isn't "PatsandBostonfan" kinda redundant? jk... kinda
Since 2003, he is 23-5 in games played when it is freezing, while Manning is 1-6.
Mentioned this earlier, but for every pro-Manning argument or stat, there's an equally impressive pro-Brady one. Manning has better completion percentage or more yards? Well, Brady has a much higher TD/INT ratio. Brady is a system QB? Well, Manning has consistently had better weapons around him througout his career.
Stats are too close. Comes down to wins and rings. Brady's got Manning crushed there.
Tom Brady same team as Cassel Tom Brady (2007): 398 of 578 for 4,806 yards, 50 touchdowns and eight interceptions.How has Matt Cassel done since he left New England?
And this is why people like me cannot have a serious debate with someone like you. Patriots fans and Steelers fans are the worst at any sort of serious debate when it involves their teams.
I keep hearing this argument, but Peyton won a Super Bowl in the pouring rain in January. He played 15 of his games last year outside and 9 games this season outside. These are two of his best seasons of his career. The argument just doesn't make sense to me.
Also... isn't "PatsandBostonfan" kinda redundant? jk... kinda
Football is a team sport.
Freeney and Sanders weren't exactly crap and James was better than average running back . Brady also had no one to really throw to then either .This is the key of this whole debate IMO. Manning had steaming piles of crap for a defense (and running game for that matter) for many years in Indy, and Brady accompanied arguably dominant defenses to 3 Super Bowl wins. Give Manning the same defense in Indy as Brady had, and I'd argue you'd see Manning with 3 Super Bowl wins too, if not more.
This is the key of this whole debate IMO. Manning had steaming piles of crap for a defense (and running game for that matter) for many years in Indy, and Brady accompanied arguably dominant defenses to 3 Super Bowl wins. Give Manning the same defense in Indy as Brady had, and I'd argue you'd see Manning with 3 Super Bowl wins too, if not more.
Freeney and Sanders weren't exactly crap and James was better than average running back . Brady also had no one to really throw to then either .
This is the key of this whole debate IMO. Manning had steaming piles of crap for a defense (and running game for that matter) for many years in Indy, and Brady accompanied arguably dominant defenses to 3 Super Bowl wins. Give Manning the same defense in Indy as Brady had, and I'd argue you'd see Manning with 3 Super Bowl wins too, if not more.
While being an awesome pass rusher in his prime, Freeney is completely one dimensional though and totally non-existent against the run, often taking himself way out of plays where teams would pick up on it and use his over pursuit against him. Bob Sanders played about 2 games without being injured. I think he once pulled a groin sneezing or something. Possibly one of the biggest defensive busts of all time after being a DPOY early in his career (in a season he participated in 12 games, the most of his career).
He's won several games just this season in cold weather.