Irish Insanity
Well-known member
- Messages
- 9,885
- Reaction score
- 584
I've seen nothing to the point of him leaving. I'm kinda lost on how this thread turned into assumptions of that.
I've seen nothing to the point of him leaving. I'm kinda lost on how this thread turned into assumptions of that.
This. Everybody is literally just assuming he's gone because of how previous players have been. Is there any evidence other than assumptions?
Boy that Folston really runs like a stud. He's a real winner that one.
....
and it was Folston who was the flight risk.. lol
People in this thread are crazy, talking like it's a done deal that he's transferring. It's like people have expectations of transfers and project it on to players who may or may not transfer.
You want to compare 1st year Golson to 2nd year Miller when I already said Miller > Golson?
i'm not sure what we're arguing? i'm saying urban his having a lot more success in his second season offensively than BK is having in his 4th and the players seem much more comfortable in urban's system than ours do
It's because Guiton and Miller are much better then Golson and Rees. Also there skill guys are better and deeper then we currently are. Hense the success.
It's because Guiton and Miller are much better then Golson and Rees. Also there skill guys are better and deeper then we currently are. Hense the success.
So they drop 45+ a game and we struggle to move the ball against teams like Temple and Purdue.
Cmon now, thats all on Rees.
This thread is so gross.
Cmon now, thats all on Rees.
No trust me I understand that. But I believe they have more at the skill positions then we do. This topic gets me all jacked up when NDdecker I'm sure some of you know him said he would take Golson over Miller
This. Everybody is literally just assuming he's gone because of how previous players have been. Is there any evidence other than assumptions?
Isn't this thread supposed to be about Greg Bryant?