I don't think power runs are specific to certain formations. There are teams that run power out of the spread, Guz Malzahn being one of them.
We are not currently a team that focuses on power out of the spread, but it is something that is done around the country. I believe Clemson runs a power spread based offensive system.
I do agree that our offense lacks some power principles in any offensive set, but where I may differ is the ideology that power is specific to certain sets.
Malzahn uses an HB and RB and an Uptempo offense per SBNation
Auburn will run mostly 3 and 4 wide sets, but like Meyer they use a TE/H-back and FB in the formation as an extra blocker instead of pulling a lineman
Malzahn also pulls guards and the TE to overload the defenders. ND pull a RG in the UM game and the RB got blown up in the backfield when the RT was left with 2 defenders to try and block. He committed to the inside man running through the vacated RG's slot. He whiffed and and the ND RB got dropped while he had to wait for the RG to clear.
AU's QB has carried 17 times so far this season for 80 yds. Rees has carried twice for -14.
ND can use an HB but you still have Tommy.
Auburn is supposed to be Uptempo but in '13 they've averaged 67 total plays a game, the same as ND. Last year ND's Rushing Game was ranked higher than AU's.
The Clemson depth chart I found shows a FB. They also run some Pistol. Whatever they run they run quickly. Clemson averages 85 plays a game. The OC called out Tajh Boyd for only running 70 some plays against UGA noting that he took too long for Boyd to look to the sideline and get the play off. They want it done in 20 seconds.
Boyd's speed and size enable them to use him as a successful runner again which ND doesn't have in the stable. Hendrix has trouble getting plays off in time.
