I don't blame him. Sure he wasn't a good coach, but he didn't deserve even a thousandth of the abuse he received. Can you imagine getting your dream job, coaching for your alma mater, and then failing them? He already felt bad, but the personal attacks were way too much. People would put for-sale signs on his front lawn and do all kinds of other stuff. Can you imagine being a father and having your son hear the kind of stuff people are saying about you in that situation? I will always sympathize with Weis. Not a good coach, but he tried his best, left the program in better shape than he got it, and I wish him all the best.
Yes, the Obamas and Bushs do. Mayors, Congressmen, athletes, high school coaches, etc, etc. all have peole take shots at their kids. For Sale signs, moving vans, billboards, FireXYZ.com, stadium flyovers ... Doesn't make it right but it's commonplace. It goes with the territory.
Which is why most people in those situations don't put their 12 year old in a headset on the field game after game. In PC after PC Charlie touted he son's sage grasp of football fundamentals that Charlie's players didn't demonstrate on the field. Charlie painted a bullseye on Jr's back and then sent him out to play in a vicious world. He reaped what he sowed.
Taking your kid to work for a day is part of parenting. Injecting your child into the fishbowl of national TV and the media is child abuse.
The ND community embraced Hannah and the Weis Foundation. Let's keep it in prospective.
I was an ardent supporter of Weis. I understood in '07 what Willingham had left him. But he did have 2+ classes in. In '09 they were all his. Navy, Syracuse, ... He should have been able to beat either of those teams if he was coaching Toledo's talent. After all he did have a schematic advantage, didn't he?
Interesting reading that he was accused of not developing a backup QB at UF. He never developed one at ND. Now he doesn't have to develop anybody, he can just plug in JUCOs somebody else developed for him.