I do find it interesting that intoxication is no excuse for poor judgement in terms of, say, robbing a liquor store or getting into a fight. But intoxication appears to be a perfectably acceptable excuse for poor judgement in terms of choosing a sexual partner. Despite being drunk, you are assumed to have willingly committed a robbery or other crime. But, when a girl is drunk, it is assumed that the she was an UNwilling participant in any sexual conduct.
This isn't about the girl and her intoxication. This is about three men that new better; took advantage of her, (by all accounts), and had intercourse without consent.
I would think there would have to be very good eye witness testimony, because I am not sure any forensic material was collected. I would think if it was this investigation would have had legs in 2012.
Now it seems as there is more that three a$$holes bragging in this case, because that would be ironic if any one of them was caught just by their own words.
The thing that disturbs me about this post kmoose, is that many people have the idea that the assaulted person is responsible for their sexual assault. They are not ever. That is just the way it is.
And in this case it is a more ridiculous assertion, because this girl, (from everything I have read or heard was 'unconscious' or at best 'semi-conscious' during all of it. Stupid for a girl to sail into such dangerous waters alone? Maybe. But maybe she thought she was safe with male friends, even some of those who slipped her Willie.