Oy. For the benefit of any Cyclone fans who may be lurking here, allow me to explain...
In the same sentence they show that ISU degree is an average return,,,
ISU's "30y Return" comes from my
Football ROI ranking. That figure, in turn, is derived from
Payscale's objective salary data, which reflects how much an average undergraduate degree from any given institution will increase one's earning potential over and above that of someone with only a high school diploma (I've backed out things like "Cost of Attendance" and "Average Scholarship" in mine, since those are irrelevant to athletes on full rides). My ranking only considers the 71 schools with BCS-caliber (being very generous here) football programs. ISU ranks 39th out of 71 on degree value alone, which is below average for football schools.
...of 88% and above average nationally.
88% refers to your
Caucasian Football GSR; that's another objective statistic, only this one is compiled by the NCAA. It reflects how many of your Caucasian football players either graduate or transfer/ go pro in good academic standing. 88% is nothing to brag about, since
the median is 84%, but it's still technically above average.
So they are either implying that we don't help the African American players or that ND poster is just dumb.
This where you should be embarrassed of ISU (doubly so if it's your alma mater, as you're having trouble grasping some very basic concepts here). The Cyclones only manage to graduate
45% of their African American football players. Why? Maybe you're recruiting inner-city kids who have virtually no chance of succeeding academically in college (that's called exploitation). Maybe you don't provide your athletes with the academic and organizational support they need to properly balance real course work with the rigors of DI athletics. Or maybe you just don't give a sh!t if your players go to class. Whatever the reason, any African American parent should think twice before handing their son over to Rhoads' care.
And what's with the huge disparity between graduation rates for Caucasian and African-American players? Rhoads is graduating nearly 2 Caucasians for every African-American on his team. The only program with a larger
Racial GSR Disparity is FSU.
Anyway, more importantly my advice to Lazard would be that the degree doesn't really matter that much at this time. All college degrees are becoming less valuable except for a few areas like engineering and agriculture. His potential earnings from one year in the NFL are as much as most college graduates lifetime earnings. He should focus on learning good basic money management in order to make that potential NFL check last a long time. The few institutions with really good academics that would make a difference salary wise are not going to cut it football wise."
That's rich. Lazard starts getting interest from Stanford, ND, etc., so ISU fan counsels "the degree doesn't really matter." Would you tell Allen that only ~2% of DI athletes get drafted? That the average NFL career only lasts ~3 years? That 78% of NFL players file for bankruptcy within 5 years of leaving the league?
Lazard seems to be a great talent, so his chances of making the NFL are definitely better than most. But only a tiny fraction of recruited football players become independently wealthy through professional sports. The vast majority will end up making a living doing something else. That's why maximizing degree value in college is always a good idea for these kids-- it's an insurance policy against the overwhelming odds that they don't become set for life through football.
For African-American recruits, ND is offering the best insurance policy in the nation. ISU's? Not so competitive. The "cash value" of ND's policy is roughly
6 times what ISU is offering.
But what do I know? I'm probably just dumb.