"He asked out of his letter in March. It's been weeks, then months."
@Jake_Brown: #NotreDame HAS NOT released Vanderdoes from his NLI. It’s written right in the story. 4th paragraph: Prep Blog: National football recruit Vanderdoes says he is not going to Notre Dame and is off to UCLA
So what is the truth?
I think we basically allowed UCLA to talk with him and did not let him out of his LOI.
So he's paying the penalty for beaking hi LOI but ND didn't exercise their power to prevent him from going to another school? So this is just like not blocking, say, Gunner Kiel from transferring?
Isn't this what everyone expected to happen?
Trying to read between the lines, it looks like EV is trying to pressure ND into releasing him from his LOI. The article says at one point that the Vanderdoeses hope ND will release EV once he enrolls at UCLA--presumably because then it will be clear that there is no chance of him attending ND, so, in their thinking, ND would have no reason besides pettiness not to release (as we've discussed, there is another reason -- setting a bad precedent for other recruits to follow if they change their mind after signing day). The Vanderdoeses evidently think that if they release this statement, ND looks like a bad guy if it doesn't go ahead and grant the release.
So in reality, nothing happened?
I just wish there was some way we couldn't let him go to UCLA or he would have to waste a year at JUCO like that loser tight end who transferred from here.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Sense is once Notre Dame learns 4 certain that Vanderdoes has signed & is enrolled with UCLA, he'll be released. Don't want him at USC</p>— Joe Davidson (@SacBee_JoeD) <a href="https://twitter.com/SacBee_JoeD/status/341963430602895360">June 4, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
So the family must have threatened that if we didnt release him that he would sit a year and go to USC or why would we be worried about it