Between him and Matt Nelson, it looks like we are going all Stanford with the TE position.
If he verbals, do we still take Mark Andrews?
Yes. We are recruiting Andrews at WR, and we are recruiting 2 TEs anyway.
GB posted something a month ago (or so) that Andrews was a Flex TE like Eifert. From what I understand, Bunting is the same Flex TE - pass catcher that the staff will coach up to be a serviceable blocker on the edge.
I know we're taking 2 TEs, but I assume one of them will be a more traditional TE and a better in-line blocker. Bunting and Andrews will be converted WRs and that would leave us without a traditional TE. That's where my question comes from. I could see Luatua and Andrews (Jesus on ice skates that would be awesome) or Luatua/other traditional TE and Andrews/Bunting/etc.
Andrews is more of a WR than Bunting. Luatua is taken no matter what because, like Niklas a couple years ago, the staff likes him at both TE and OLB. Many believe Luatua is even preferred on defense.
Bunting is a beast. Better than Jeb Blazevich and Nic Weishar. Great offer list.
In TV they talked about a scenario where we get Bunting, Helm goes to Michigan, and Weishar to Northwestern. Then we play the waiting game with for Luatua or Schultz.
247 says Bunting is looking like ND. I think he's the best of the 3 IL TE's even though Rivals rates him 3rd behind Helm and Weishar. Definitely Jeb better than Bunting, think Jeb might be the best TE in the nation. Luatua is a much better defensive prospect than TE prospect imo. Mark Andrews never plays WR, he's deluding himself if he thinks he's a WR at the next level, however he is definitely the best pass catching TE in this class.