I know constructive criticism of players is practically illegal around here, but Farley is clearly the weak link the in defense. He terrifies me, and not in a "he might kill that guy with this hitting" kind of way.
Hmmm... Maybe you are getting confused about the meaning of "constructive criticism." Saying you are "terrified" of a player because they are "clearly the weak link" is not, in fact, constructive.
As far as weak link, that is true in the sense that he is the "weakest" starter on arguably the best defense in the country. I would grant that Teo, Tuitt, Nix, Jackson, Prince, KLM, Motta, Spond, Fox, and even Russell are all arguably better at their position. So we might have to cover for Farley and Russell a little. How has that gone? Let's look at the points we have given up in games where Farley took over for Slaughter:
MSU- 3 (0 passing TDs)
Michigan 6 (0 passing TDs, he had an interception)
Miami- 3 (0 passing TDs, although we were lucky that this was not 1!)
Stanford- 13 (1 passing TD)
BYU- 14 (2 passing TDs)
OK- 13 (1 passing TD against some of the best players in the country)
Pitt- 26 (1 passing TD, he had just broken his arm)
BC- 6 (0 passing TDs)
Wake- 0 (0 passing TDs)
There is nothing terrifying about the production of this defense with Farley as its "weak link." We gave up passing 3 TDs over the first two games with Slaughter against Navy and Purdue. That's an average of 1.5 TDs/g. We gave up 5 more over the next 10 games, for an average of .5 TD/g. This is just not terrifying.