ND on Outside the Lines right now!

NDTH91

Well-known member
Messages
1,092
Reaction score
204
"Notre Dame Resurgence: Examining the Brian Kelly Era at Notre Dame"
 
K

koonja

Guest
Kelly, irrelevance, tragedies, Kelly's run, prior coaching, recruiting. Segment started at 3 eastern and is still on.
 
K

koonja

Guest
Talking about how Kelly handled the Declan tragedy. Spending a lot of time on that. Reporters talking about how hard it is to win at ND, and that they don't offer 'basket weaving' as a major. BK is showing that you CAN win at ND, although it is tougher than the SEC/Pac10.
 
K

koonja

Guest
"ND is like the Yankees. If you don't like them, you hate them. If I write an article on Ole Miss nobody says anything, if I write something about ND I get a ton of emails/tweets saying "why are you writing about ND, they suck." That's how you know they're relevant".

Not sure how to quote-inside of a quote. Paging dshans.
 
Last edited:

Jason Pham

Administrator
Messages
2,608
Reaction score
320
"ND is like the Yankees. If you don't like them, you hate them. If I write an article on Ole Miss nobody says anything, if I write something about ND I get a ton of emails/tweets saying "why are you writing about ND, they suck." That's how you know they're relevant".

Not sure how to quote-inside of a quote. Paging dshans.

Single quotation marks.
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,077
"ND is like the Yankees. If you don't like them, you hate them. If I write an article on Ole Miss nobody says anything, if I write something about ND I get a ton of emails/tweets saying "why are you writing about ND, they suck." That's how you know they're relevant".

Not sure how to quote-inside of a quote. Paging dshans.

I believe you put the single 'marks' around the quote, not the "double" when it is a quote inside of a quote. But we must go deeper
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
It's a taco in a taco!

I feel bad posting this twice in a little over a week... but...

<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C_c7cmeDAOw?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C_c7cmeDAOw?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
 

Cogs

Active member
Messages
288
Reaction score
82
I feel bad posting this twice in a little over a week... but...

<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C_c7cmeDAOw?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C_c7cmeDAOw?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

I'll give a hoot woodsy!
 

dshans

They call me The Dribbler
Messages
9,624
Reaction score
1,181
I believe you put the single 'marks' around the quote, not the "double" when it is a quote inside of a quote. But we must go deeper

"Going deeper" can present a problem. Tearing of the Space-Time Punctuation Continuum can result once you quote a quote within a quote, etc. The number of quotation marks (quadruple, triple, double and single, etc.) can result in a dizzying vortex of "who said what and when."

I recommend the Simplified Theory of Punctuation. Judicious use of periods, commas, colons and semi-colons can be your friend.

Short, stacccato and clear statements with appropriate punctuation marks and capitalization to separate them can facilitate clarity.

You're most welcome.
 
Top