Patulski
www.ndnation.com
- Messages
- 878
- Reaction score
- 138
You're repeatedly bringing up a convicted felon's name...
Yet you still use Urban Meyer as a point of reference?
Yes, to show the paradox of how "integrity" is applied at Notre Dame. Get it?
You're repeatedly bringing up a convicted felon's name...
Yet you still use Urban Meyer as a point of reference?
If you are going to have an offense built around speed, you probably want to be playing on turf.
Yes, to show the paradox of how "integrity" is applied at Notre Dame. Get it?
Nothing personal here, but this is exactly the flawed logic for the turf arguement that bothers me. Granted, you may be able to run faster on turf, but if both teams are playing on the same surface it balances out so there is no real advantage.
What I get is:
You want ND to use the same supposed philosophy as a coach that had 30+ arrests (some FELONIES) In 3 years, mind you, at UF
Yet, you still harp on the fact that we have a performing arts center with a convicted felon's name on it....
So, yeah, I think I get it.
So you are fine with completely trashing Notre Dame's tradition of academic excellence, but you draw the line on field turf?
So tell me what you think our record is going to be in 2012. That will tell me much more about your belief in this program's progress than this verbal dancing.
After being asked what my solution was to the situation, I alluded to Urban Meyer's request for 5 JUCO's for three years to jumpstart the program. If that is reactionary, delusional and ultimately harmful to the program's progress, I'll defer to Meyer's conception of what's needed before heeding anybody else's opinion. I believe if we had done it, we would have been in a far better position than we are today. You don't. Let's agree to disagree.
If you are so concerned about the integrity of ND, you should get on the phone with Jenkins' office and ask them why they still have a convicted felon's name on their Performing Arts Center. Have you done that? I did. It's seems to me that concerning integrity, taking money from a convicted felon caught up in a casino bribery scandal-and putting said felons name on a Performing Arts Center- is much worse than having a temporary cessation on the ban on JUCO's for three years and 15 players.
DeBartolo was involved in the corruption case of former Louisiana governor Edwin Edwards. He pleaded guilty to a charge of failing to report a felony, and received a $1 million fine and two years of probation in return for his testimony against Edwards. Edwards was on trial for extortion and other charges, among which were the $400,000 he demanded from DeBartolo to gain a river boat casino license. DeBartolo never received the license, was fined by the NFL, and barred from active control of the 49ers for one year.
Well, seeing that my Dad played for Leahy, I saw my first game in 1965, graduated in 1981 and my daughter graduated in 2005, I can tell you : The ship has been sinking since 1995. It is so completely obvious to me, who I daresay has a lot more experience (and ND blood running through my veins) with ND football than you.
You know where you can stick your "bail" comment. I'm not going to bail, I'm going to align my views- and my money- with those who want our tradition of greatness restored, not further eroded.
And who are you to tell me "we'll make it to port safe and sound". Are you involved in the university at a decision making level? If you are, the past two 8-5 seasons sucked, and Kelly is looking a lot like Bob Davie: A guy who produced mediocre teams, but had a ton of excuses why he failed and what he needed to succeed. This latest Kelly excuse, "that his players were awed by the stadium", is the most ridiculous excuse yet.
What I get is:
You want ND to use the same supposed philosophy as a coach that had 30+ arrests (some FELONIES) In 3 years, mind you, at UF
Yet, you still harp on the fact that we have a performing arts center with a convicted felon's name on it....
So, yeah, I think I get it.
I thought it was named for a different member of his family anyway.
If you think 15 JUCO's would completely trash Notre Dame's tradition of academic excellence, I would disagree. I see it as a pragmatic strategy based on the advice of a NC winning coach. Nothing would change for 99% of the student body and athletes. It may work. It might not. I'd do that before changing the stadium and game day traditions.
No, you don't get it. It's all about money. If ND needed the money, they would take the collateral damage, though I doubt it would be at Florida levels because ND's culture is different than Florida's.
Provide a source that Urban only wanted them for three seasons. I was told that he wanted a certain number of them each year in perpetuity.
I had to leave the thread, but it seems when I came back that there was quite a brouhaha taking place on this thread. I looked back and pinned it all to your comments. You know people not as steeped in tradition, or as lucky as you can love Notre Dame. That's what people like Father Corby intended. They wanted to give what they had to as many people as possible.
You sir, from everything I have read here, are a snob.
Bingo. All those buildings are named after DeBartolo Sr. and his wife, Marie. Patulski seems to think that because Jr. got extorted by an elected official and failed to report it, the DeBartolos are a criminal syndicate, and every cent ND has ever received from the family is somehow tainted.
So I guess that's a "no"?
yes... I quoted myself...
^hilarious
This was interesting on everydayshouldbesaturday.com:
AND FIELD TURF RUINS NOTRE DAME FOOTBALL FOREVER. We talked a bit about FieldTurf coming to Notre Dame on Twitter, but to reiterate a really obvious series of points:
•The problem with the ND in-game experience is not a Jumbotron, or the lack of one, or the wooden seats, or the grass. It is the ethos of sad asses planted to seats shushing anyone who shows enthusiasm.
•If you want this to be your thing, and to keep Notre Dame as the Westminster Dog Show of football environments, that's fine. That's your thing. It will be the opposite of fun, and a drudge to watch, and it will be tradition because tradition because tradition. You go ahead and do that.
•But if that is not what you want--and there are Notre Dame fans who do not want this, and would like to have a good time at games without things devolving to utter, LSU-ish anarchy--then you need to do a few things.
•You need to stand up. You need to stop telling others to sit down. You need to yell. You need to act like you care without being the repressed Midwestern uncle of in-stadium fanbases. You see what the student section is doing? DO THAT. Okay, don't attempt pushups on top of the extended hands of your friends, because that's a great way to dislocate a middle-aged shoulder. But the other stuff, yeah: DO THAT.
•Those who don't like it can go to the luxury boxes, where you can feel really great about all the money you've made via superior virtue, and most definitely not because of your social connections purchased through a degree. You go up there, and let the wolves have their fun in the stands.
•It is a football game. It is not Death of a Salesman in pads.
•Oh, and fire every usher in the place. They're worthless pocket fascists who wear--we are not kidding--UNIFORMS. Point and laugh at them until they leave if firing is too complex.
If you want a real environment, do all that. If you want the mausoleum, just keep on doing you, Notre Dame. We could couldn't care less, since there are no fewer than fifty or sixty college football stadiums we would rather see a game at. Boise has a better atmosphere than South Bend once the whistle starts, even if you get kicked out in the first quarter for drinking in the stands. Which we did. On a work assignment. Go Broncos.
[/end Notre Dame monologue]
Well, seeing that my Dad played for Leahy, I saw my first game in 1965, graduated in 1981 and my daughter graduated in 2005, I can tell you : The ship has been sinking since 1995. It is so completely obvious to me, who I daresay has a lot more experience (and ND blood running through my veins) with ND football than you.
You know where you can stick your "bail" comment. I'm not going to bail, I'm going to align my views- and my money- with those who want our tradition of greatness restored, not further eroded.
And who are you to tell me "we'll make it to port safe and sound". Are you involved in the university at a decision making level? If you are, the past two 8-5 seasons sucked, and Kelly is looking a lot like Bob Davie: A guy who produced mediocre teams, but had a ton of excuses why he failed and what he needed to succeed. This latest Kelly excuse, "that his players were awed by the stadium", is the most ridiculous excuse yet.
Bingo. All those buildings are named after DeBartolo Sr. and his wife, Marie. Patulski seems to think that because Jr. got extorted by an elected official and failed to report it, the DeBartolos are a criminal syndicate, and every cent ND has ever received from the family is somehow tainted.
I never called the DeBartolos a criminal syndicate, I called Jr. a convicted felon. Do you deny this?
And to deny Jr's involvement in Notre Dame's DeBartolo Quad flies in the face of reality. When giving a $33 million dollar gift to ND, he said ""The education which I received at the university was of the finest quality and has enabled me to attain both my personal and professional goals." So, to assert that DeBartolo Hall and DeBartolo Quad doesn't include Jr. is ignoring his financial involvement.
I never called the DeBartolos a criminal syndicate, I called Jr. a convicted felon. Do you deny this?