I touched on this previously, but a lot of people online are confusing tax appraised value and market value. They're very different numbers. I don't pretend to understand how the Florida CAP rules and the SCH homestead stuff factor in as those can be kinda screwy, I dealt mostly with Colorado and Missouri when I was on the rest estate tax side of things. I also don't buy that the property is worth a billion.
Even at the most unconservative valuation of MAL i have seen...$300 million is the highest. Trump and his sons are claiming its worth $1.8 billion and they would USE that on their SFCs..... that is the fraud and what they are being held to account for The judge did not establish the valuations for the properties just so we are clear.
But similarly.....just like how people are "confusing" the adjacent unencumbered home value/taxes and MAL property worth/taxes? The real issue that no one is talking about in all this is the actual fraud that was committed by the Trump's as part of a long term well documented and quite clear fraudulent scam.
NY Supreme Court
www.documentcloud.org
This is the order showing why the judge ruled the way he did. They clearly violated the specific fraud law in NY by repeatedly and consistently using fraudulent valuations to conduct business and the defense provided to the judge on behalf of TrumpOrg were wholly without merit or legal basis....shocking (page 20)
He claimed a unit he resided in in Trump tower was 30,000 sf but was actually 11,000 sf resulting in an overvaluation of this property but hundreds of millions of dollars. He claims the calculations for "square footage" is subjective....lmao. Maybe due to weird shapes and layouts one could expect 10-20% discrepancies but not 200%. The rest in on pages 21 and after. Feel free to read it. They made intentionally incorrect SFCs even after being informed they were inaccurate. Not only that but Trump's depositions showed that there was systmic fraud and business malpractice because of his "worthless clause" (LMAO) and the fact no one ever reviewed the fraudulent SFCs even though it was celar they knew they were fraudulent. That was all the burden there was required for this law to be tried.
The footnotes are incredible reading.