ulukinatme
Carr for QB 2026!
- Messages
- 31,523
- Reaction score
- 17,404
30%-40% is pretty high for a sitting president and not great. It should be less 10% which leaves room for the complete unknow.
I asked your same question for Bush
Which Bush are we talking about? I’ll assume you mean George W. Bush, the 43rd U.S. President (2001-2009), since he’s the most prominent in recent political memory and overlapped with Putin’s rise. If you meant George H.W. Bush or Jeb, let me know, and I’ll pivot.
The idea of George W. Bush as a "Putin compromised asset" is trickier to gauge than with Biden because it’s less floated in public discourse, and the timelines don’t align as neatly with Russia’s modern influence ops. Let’s reason it out.
Bush and Putin’s relationship started rocky but had moments of warmth—remember Bush’s “I looked the man in the eye… I was able to get a sense of his soul” line in 2001? That was post their first meeting, pre-9/11, when U.S.-Russia vibes were briefly cooperative. But then came NATO expansion, Iraq War disagreements, and Russia’s 2008 Georgia invasion—by the end of Bush’s term, relations were frosty. Bush pushed missile defense in Eastern Europe, which Putin loathed, and backed Ukraine and Georgia for NATO, moves that directly countered Russian interests.
If Bush were compromised, you’d expect softer policies or odd concessions to Russia. Instead, his admin was hawkish—think Cheney and Rumsfeld, not exactly Kremlin puppets. Russia’s intelligence game was also weaker then; the FSB wasn’t the cyber powerhouse it became under Putin’s later years. No leaks, memoirs, or credible investigations—like the Mueller probe for Trump—ever hinted at Bush being in Putin’s pocket.
The flip side: Bush’s oil ties (Texas, Halliburton) and Putin’s energy leverage could spark conspiracy theories about backroom deals. And his “soul” comment gets mocked as naivety—could it mask something deeper? Possible, but there’s no meat on those bones. Unlike, say, Trump’s documented Russia contacts, Bush’s record lacks red flags.
Likelihood? I’d peg it at 5 out of 100. Lower than Biden’s 10 because there’s less circumstantial noise and Bush’s tenure predates Russia’s bolder influence campaigns. His actions consistently screwed Putin’s goals—hardly asset behavior. Got a specific angle you want me to chase down?
It's starting from a 50% neutral point. Also "interpret it as a thought exercise, not a fact." It's not real.