Seriously. If the NCAA doesn't impose penalties for this kind of egregious and disgusting conduct, why even have the penalties in the first place? I think we can all agree that some form of allowance, or acceptance, or even covering up, by the football program of the abhorrent activities of Sandusky is much, much worse than recruits getting paid off. If this doesn't fit squarely into the definition of "lack of institutional control," I don't know what could.
Quite simply, Schultz and Curley are charged with failure to report child abuse. The evidence now indicates that they knew of Sandusky's crimes but either (1) chose on their own or with conjunction with those in the football program not to proceed for fear of any potential penalties, criminal or otherwise; or (2) spoke with Paterno about it and subsequently did not come forward with the information. Regardless, this is entirely damning information that should bring serious infractions. If the results of the interplay between the football program and the university administration were to leave two high ranking school officials fired and charged with a failure to report child abuse, how in the world could the NCAA not take action?
For once, please NCAA, do not screw this up. Set an example. There are certain things in life that are more important than maintaining a football program. Here, there's no argument that "every school is doing it," that "these penalties are unproportional," or that "college athletes should get a stipend anyways," like there are with other NCAA penalty impositions.