Does anyone know if we offered JayShawn Ross with him being from St Louis you would think we might have shot?
Small thing (unless you have STL in your handle) but JayShawn Ross appears to be from Kansas City.Does anyone know if we offered JayShawn Ross with him being from St Louis you would think we might have shot?
Prescod
Young
Scott?
Gotta keep Scott.... Chicago kid.
OMG the Dancing Emoji's are as useless as a third tit yet people try to decipher them ...OMFG dumb and dumber.
Lastly, the luckiest of the group, special teams coordinator Brian Mason will be in the state of Hawaii all week doing some area recruiting. Whether he lands anyone or not, after what his group did this season, this couldn’t be a more deserving trip for the elite special teams coach.
247sports.com
so was Jay and Silent BobTotal Recall was a good movie, tho.
...
Crystal Balls have value since they are to a specific player.They're not worthless. They signify a silent commit, which outside of Dante Moore, was the vast majority of our class this past year.
Man, they must really not like the upperclassmen DL on the roster hahaLoy pretty much said they’d take up to 8 DL if the right ones want in
No, all of the silent commits worked out last year sans Moore. But you can reverse engineer any outcome to be the miserable "irish fan" you want to be.Crystal Balls have value since they are to a specific player.
Acknowledging a silent commit but not which recruit is giving that (fairly useless) commit which by definition isn't public to begin with is like acknowledging a tree that falls in Siberia. I know trees fall in Siberia but who cares?
FWIW there were many other dancing emojis that didn't pan out other than Dante Moore. But of course, you can always reverse engineer the outcome since no recruit is actually tied to the dancing emoji. Hence the stupidity of it.
That may be, but Alabama took 7 DL/Edge players in the 23 class. I think you may just have to overrecruit that position due to attrition.Man, they must really not like the upperclassmen DL on the roster haha
No, all of the silent commits worked out last year sans Moore. But you can reverse engineer any outcome to be the miserable "irish fan" you want to be.
When the Bag Man comes, they need to make sure they still hit their numbers.Loy pretty much said they’d take up to 8 DL if the right ones want in
Care to name them? Because you can't. Because it was only Moore. The rest were public commits that decommitted.Sorry you don't like my answer. There was more than just Moore btw and it was covered extensively here.
how would we know if he doesnt say the names?Care to name them? Because you can't. Because it was only Moore. The rest were public commits that decommitted.
Exactly! LOL... again this was already covered previously here at IE. Driskell / Driskell's buddy needs to do his research.how would we know if he doesnt say the names?
Numbers would match up and using reason. For example, I expect these 3 silent commits to commit some time in the next 2-3 weeks. It doesn't count in my book if he says there's a silent and then they commit two months later.how would we know if he doesnt say the names?
Please. Everything you post is an affront to educated, thought out reason.Exactly! LOL... again this was already covered previously here at IE. Driskell / Driskell's buddy needs to do his research.
Care to name them? Because you can't. Because it was only Moore. The rest were public commits that decommitted.
Check the posting history player. Been here 10+ years.Methinks you protest too much... Just out of curiosity, how many Built Bars have you eaten today??
Check the posting history player. Been here 10+ years.
Son, I know you're touched in the head, but I'm not Driskell. Proven by how I've been posting here for a long time. You're part of the influx of people in the last year that just add nothing positive to site and exist just to post trash. In fact, I even criticized Driskell in another thread in the last 10 minutes. One with some more positive news, which I'm sure you're not one to frequent as it doesn't fit with your narrative of being BKs best friend. But I've wasted enough of my life arguing with you. To the ignore list you go.So what does that mean? LOL. I noticed you didn't answer the question. Probably washed it down with some Mountain Dew.
You seem particularly emotional about this subject. If you dig these useless Dancing Emojis then enjoy Irish Breakdown and pay for that kind of intel.
im not one side or another here and i dont listen jsut going off what ive read on here.Numbers would match up and using reason. For example, I expect these 3 silent commits to commit some time in the next 2-3 weeks. It doesn't count in my book if he says there's a silent and then they commit two months later.
Son, I know you're touched in the head, but I'm not Driskell. In fact, I even criticized Driskell in another thread. One with some more positive news, which I'm sure you're not one to frequent as it doesn't fit with your narrative of being BKs best friend.
im not one side or another here and i dont listen jsut going off what ive read on here.
It does seem like there is a lot of wiggle room to ensure not being wrong. if there is some level of timeliness between the prediction (emojis??) to the announcements then i would think you could draw some direct conclusions.
Has that happened - beyond me.
I will say that I do recall some specific calling out of the vagueness in his predictions last summer to Irish Drunk's point.
I think there may have been one outside of Moore, but the rest had commitments in the next month. Yes, it can leave wiggle room and isnt specific, but if I'm looking at a data set, I'm going to go with the thing that has a 90% chance of something happening. Also, it's pretty easy to cross reference Driskells dancing gifs across 247, ISD, On3 etc.im not one side or another here and i dont listen jsut going off what ive read on here.
It does seem like there is a lot of wiggle room to ensure not being wrong. if there is some level of timeliness between the prediction (emojis??) to the announcements then i would think you could draw some direct conclusions.
Has that happened - beyond me.
I will say that I do recall some specific calling out of the vagueness in his predictions last summer to Irish Drunk's point.
I think there may have been one outside of Moore, but the rest had commitments in the next month. Yes, it can leave wiggle room and isnt specific, but if I'm looking at a data set, I'm going to go with the thing that has a 90% chance of something happening. Also, it's pretty easy to cross reference Driskells dancing gifs across 247, ISD, On3 etc.