I replied to you because you said "they were all super excited to jump on me", then you excluded Virginia and Turtle.
You ever have one of those posters you just read and move on? Not responding to his posts doesn't mean I agree with Giddyup. You'd be hard pressed to find where I replied to or supported any of his posts. I did give him a thumbs up once, but it had nothing to do with anything antisemitic.
I excluded them because they actually either corrected Giddyup or agreed with my post. If you want to re-litigate the exact posters who've suggested I was antisemtic for calling Bibi's administration out we can do that.
Usually Giddyup is that, but when he says something like "ever seen more people wanting to start a World War more than a Jewish president of Ukraine" and "Sure. Jewish tribe is not natural to Ukraine." that seems kind of insane?
You clearly cared enough about Giddy's comments to thumbs up a post comparing them to Gattaca. So you do have an opinion on it, just that you don't think comparing a jewish leader to being a warmonger, claiming he's a CIA asset, and that "jewish tribe is not natural to Ukraine" is antisemitic?
When there is a clear example of someone trotting out the same old school jews are globalists controlling the government to launder money for their war in a territory they don't belong in, you'd rather be silent on that? It was a perfect chance for you/miller/bishop to call him out for that, but you're most insistent on arguing with me for grouping you in? Virginia and Turtle can put behind political differences to call something out, but the rest of you would rather just "lol" at saying Gattaca posts just like him.