NDVirginia19
Rally
- Messages
- 4,457
- Reaction score
- 5,163
Kurt Schlichter with the surprisingly measured and absolutely correct take
Hes actually generally pretty good when he decides to be serious. Most of the time he's trolling and cracking jokes.Kurt Schlichter with the surprisingly measured and absolutely correct take
So my take was just that money sent with a nefarious purpose is dirty and was never clean and your response is to not increase military budgets? lol. Yet you are okay with my country sending billions for a shitty country to “defend” themselves against another shitty country? Yet you and others seem to be rooting for more war and more spending? And mock Trump who wants to end this bullshit. Make it make sense.Well, why vote for people want to increase military budgets?
My point is increasing the defense budget is not an issue that establishment Dems or the GOP disagree with. Feigning some sort of shock and horror that the US Gov is sending money to less than stellar people is stupid. If they were sending money to the aggressor then you would have more of a case. Soviet's weren't exactly a fine upstanding democracy in WW2 but you'd still line up with them to defeat the Nazi's. Take issue with the MIC, it's not Ukraine's fault that there isn't a perfect record.So my take was just that money sent with a nefarious purpose is dirty and was never clean and your response is to not increase military budgets? lol. Yet you are okay with my country sending billions for a shitty country to “defend” themselves against another shitty country? Yet you and others seem to be rooting for more war and more spending? And mock Trump who wants to end this bullshit. Make it make sense.
You're probably right, but the perception that Trump is giving off is all wrong here. Meeting with Putin and calling Zelinskyy a dictator and blaming Ukraine is not the way to go about this. Maybe the "master negotiator" has something up his sleeve, but You go hardball at Russia first here one would think, then "settle" with some concessions. Instead, he is giving Russia the upper hand.There comes a time when you need to be pragmatic. I think we've reached that point. Ukraine has some eastern territory that was pro Russia. Give that to Russia and lets move on.
Shock and horror would be stupid. Disagreeing with throwing money down the drain for a war that nobody is going to win that could have and should been stopped a long time ago is a very rational thought. It’s not shock and horror just because you disagree. Equating this to defeating the Nazis is also stupid. The US made the decision to just funnel more and more money without any peace talks. They are the grown up here instigating more war when they were grown up enough with the power to stop it.My point is increasing the defense budget is not an issue that establishment Dems or the GOP disagree with. Feigning some sort of shock and horror that the US Gov is sending money to less than stellar people is stupid. If they were sending money to the aggressor then you would have more of a case. Soviet's weren't exactly a fine upstanding democracy in WW2 but you'd still line up with them to defeat the Nazi's. Take issue with the MIC, it's not Ukraine's fault that there isn't a perfect record.
Defense of what? Ukraine? Cool, they wouldn’t need defense if the end goal was to stop this buffoonery.I'm not rooting for war at all, I'm rooting for defense.
Enabling them to do what? Stop a war. Have it Trump.I mock Trump because he is enabling dictators and has been doing so his entire political career. It's made even dumber when people say it's some 4d chess move to keep your "enemies" closer, what about your friends? They get tariffs and undermined?
Shock and horror would be stupid. Disagreeing with throwing money down the drain for a war that nobody is going to win that could have and should been stopped a long time ago is a very rational thought. It’s not shock and horror just because you disagree. Equating this to defeating the Nazis is also stupid. The US made the decision to just funnel more and more money without any peace talks. They are the grown up here instigating more war when they were grown up enough with the power to stop it.
Defense of what? Ukraine? Cool, they wouldn’t need defense if the end goal was to stop this buffoonery.
Enabling them to do what? Stop a war. Have it Trump.
Ok cool, what should Biden done differently? What was Trump doing that was so successful? How do you know there were no peace talks? Who do you think is the one that needs to initiate the peace talks? I break into your house destroy it, and you shoot me in the leg. Who should apologize first?
Enabling to do whatever they want because they know that Trump will pressure his "allies" before his "enemies".
If you think Biden was making the decisions during his presidency, I got a bridge to sell you.Biden should apologize first.
Which is the first reason an apology is needed. lol.If you think Biden was making the decisions during his presidency, I got a bridge to sell you.
How do we know there were no peace talks? Something of that magnitude would be known even if they wanted to keep it quiet. Besides, Joe wasn't shy about letting everyone know he was trying to get Israel and Hamas to sit down and talk.Ok cool, what should Biden done differently? What was Trump doing that was so successful? How do you know there were no peace talks? Who do you think is the one that needs to initiate the peace talks? I break into your house destroy it, and you shoot me in the leg. Who should apologize first?
Enabling to do whatever they want because they know that Trump will pressure his "allies" before his "enemies".
His approach isn't how I would handle it either, but I'm going to wait and see what is proposed. I'm still not convinced Trump and Putin are that chummy. If they were, why didn't Putin go ahead and invade while Trump was in his first term? Conditions were more favorable.You're probably right, but the perception that Trump is giving off is all wrong here. Meeting with Putin and calling Zelinskyy a dictator and blaming Ukraine is not the way to go about this. Maybe the "master negotiator" has something up his sleeve, but You go hardball at Russia first here one would think, then "settle" with some concessions. Instead, he is giving Russia the upper hand.
He was waiting for Trump to win reelection. If Trump wins in 2020 Russia invades with zero resistance from the US.His approach isn't how I would handle it either, but I'm going to wait and see what is proposed. I'm still not convinced Trump and Putin are that chummy. If they were, why didn't Putin go ahead and invade while Trump was in his first term? Conditions were more favorable.
They were probably pretty confident that he would win since the Russians had "Biden's laptop" ready to plant and steal the election. Oh wait.He was waiting for Trump to win reelection. If Trump wins in 2020 Russia invades with zero resistance from the US.
If Russia isn't willing to come to the table to concede it seems like there's nothing to talk about, unless you want to ruin international relationships and just want to score political points.How do we know there were no peace talks? Something of that magnitude would be known even if they wanted to keep it quiet. Besides, Joe wasn't shy about letting everyone know he was trying to get Israel and Hamas to sit down and talk.
The US could invest into Ukraine and turn them into another South Korea while russia wouldn't look like North Korea.I get Trump wanting to get something out of helping Ukrine. But 50% forever is too much.
25% for 99 years sounds more appropriate.
He was waiting for Trump to win reelection. If Trump wins in 2020 Russia invades with zero resistance from the US.
Who would think they would be rely on a guy calling Zelinsky a dictator, saying Ukraine started the war, and only wants to meet with Russia for peace talks??
He didn’t invade while Trump was in office but as soon as Biden came into office he invaded. He knew he’d get less resistance from Biden.He was waiting for Trump to win reelection. If Trump wins in 2020 Russia invades with zero resistance from the US.
Like sending military aid that trump doesn't want to do?He didn’t invade while Trump was in office but as soon as Biden came into office he invaded. He knew he’d get less resistance from Biden.
He didn’t invade while Trump was in office but as soon as Biden came into office he invaded. He knew he’d get less resistance from Biden.
Great rebuttal. A lot of sheep just throwing a Ukrainian flag up in that yard cause they told u so.