Post Game Observations Rice '14

IrishFaninTX

New member
Messages
1,038
Reaction score
46
I loved the RB's, loved Golson and so glad to have him back. Those long bombs were just beautiful! Defense did better than I thought against the run. I pray we get Russell back soon. With him back then we could possibly move Riggs to safety while Collinsworth is out. At the moment I'm not worried about the dline. IMO the lack of pressure and blitzing was by design. Why would they want to give Michigan a lot of film on this new defense if they didn't need to blitz a lot to beat Rice?
 

ndftbl

Pleasured Via Sock Puppet
Messages
280
Reaction score
35
8]. Mayock was praising Schmidt when stepped up into the hole and hit the RB ... and was driven back about 3 yds. I don't recall Mike mentioning the result.

13]. In the post game PC Kelly replied to a PR question that Riggs was gassed so they went with Bryant. He described him as fearless. I took that as a +1 for character and -2 for judgement.

16]. Kelly was impressed on the few penalties. Good for a seasoned team but better considering the relative inexperience between the OLine as a Unit ... incredible considering the patchwork secondary, KVR in the box, Collinsworth on crutches, and Riggs in his first game on the team.

Exactly the point, re 8. Obviously we need Nyles Morgan to develop quickly.
 

tommyIRISH23

Well-known member
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
156
Positives- offense. We started clicking and were fun to watch

Negatives- blown coverages and some expected confusion. We need Russell back. A lot of you guys were saying the pass rush failed. It wasn't great but wasn't Rice a supposed decent rushing team? I was under the impression that we just wanted to clog the middle with bodies so their backs couldn't get any room to run? We were fast as a defense. That was good to see
 

ndftbl

Pleasured Via Sock Puppet
Messages
280
Reaction score
35
Who has currently only scored 1 offensive TD on an unranked OSU team. But they will beat the swag right out of us......

Yes, that is exactly the point.

I'm not the one who said they are the No. 1 team in the country.
 

Riddickulous

"That" Guy
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
8,325
Can't get the Prosise TD out of my head. Golson threw that thing 65 yards in the air falling away. Just absurd.
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
1. I had a wonderful day, and evening, with my now 4 year old niece(birthday girl today), and her 4 month old brother got to meet (for the first time) his future favorite uncle; Uncle Moose! Because of the attention that they commanded (and received), my watching of the game was kind of broken and disjointed, but here is what I thought I saw:

2. Golson is an average runner. He is elusive as hell in the pocket, but once out in the open, he is pretty average.

3. Joe Schmidt doesn't cover well, and missed quite a few tackles. His run support was ok, as he seemed to always be around the ball, but he failed to wrap the runner up and bring him down too many times. And he couldn't cover a mud puddle with a sheet.

4. If we don't find a way to cover the short crossing routes, we are going to get killed by the better teams on our schedule; which is most of them! And we better fix the communication issues (if that was all that it was) in the secondary.

5. 6-6 in the Red Zone today. After last year's Red Zone struggles, this was perhaps the nicest stat to see.

6. Only 2 penalties for 10 yards. Nicely done by the entire team.

7. I was impressed with Riggs' punt returns; he caught the ball, got North and South, and looked speedy. I was not impressed with Bryant's returns. That's not to say that his were bad, but they just didn't have the same eye test "Wow" factor as Riggs' returns.
 
Last edited:

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,769
Reaction score
10,146
Can't get the Prosise TD out of my head. Golson threw that thing 65 yards in the air falling away. Just absurd.

The strength of his arm is pretty special. He still needs work on some touch but he even showed some nice improvement in that area today.
 

irishog77

NOT SINBAD's NEPHEW
Messages
7,441
Reaction score
2,206
I thought Golson was freaking outstanding today. Easily the best QB performance of the Kelly era.

Moose just mentioned his running. He's definitely not a true dual threat QB, but his scrambling ability/ability to run if the play breaks down/QB draw ability will truly make it difficult for opposing coordinators to gameplan against ND, and more importantly, players to execute against ND's offense.

Honestly not sure what to think of the OL. Lax didn't like either Stanley or Elmer today. Not sure I'd go quite that far, but at least today, I thought the interior guys were much better than the edge guys. I hope some of the struggles of the OL today were merely new guys stepping in/first game of the season type hiccups. IF ND can beat michigan, I feel realy good about ND going 4-0 and then on to their first bye. So by 6 weeks in, the OL could start to look pretty good with ND 4-0 and getting into the meat of their schedule. I really hope this is the case.

No clue what to think of the D either. Many times, it almost looked like I was watching Diaco's defense out there today-- conservative and trying to keep things in front of them...bending, but not breaking. I hope this was a case of the staff trying to keep it vanilla in anticipation of michigan. I wasn't really impressed by anything or anybody on defense today, but at the same time, I didn't think anything or anybody was awful (yeah, the couple of big plays were ugly, but those are things that can be corrected). I was expecting to see more blitzes, pressure, and aggressive play today. Maybe we will next week and throughout the season? The D was obviously good enough to win today. But if what we saw today was the D's "scheme," it could be a long year on that side of the ball-- I can envision 7 or 8 teams putting up 400+ yards on them (and that doesn't even include Stanford whose style alone might make it difficult to put up a ton of yards on anybody, all while remaining highly effective).

The offense as a whole was truly a joy to watch today-- a ton of fun. Is what we saw today the actual high paced offense, or maybe just a vanilla look? It really doesn't matter to me one way or another (I've never been a believer that ND HAS to have a fast paced spread offense to succeed), as I personally would like to see them make it part of the gameplan each week. Some weeks, depending on the opponent, they run a faster pace, and some weeks they run at a slower pace. I loved seeing the decisiveness and ability to execute though. No infuriating timeouts as the play clock neared expiration. No delay of game penalties. Golson, the coaches, and the entire offense looked and executed like they knew exactly what they wanted to do...and did it. So refreshing to see that.
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
Golson is an average runner? Ok bro. 3 TDs (3rd QB in school history). Yeah pretty average

12 carries for 41 yards is a 3.4 yard per carry average. That's absolutely average, if not a little below average.

Moose just mentioned his running. He's definitely not a true dual threat QB, but his scrambling ability/ability to run if the play breaks down/QB draw ability will truly make it difficult for opposing coordinators to gameplan against ND, and more importantly, players to execute against ND's offense.

^^this^^

I wasn't meaning to be overly critical of him, I was just stating my opinion that, as a pure runner, he is pretty average. He'd be the 4th tailback on this team, without a doubt. But he doesn't have to be a great runner, to influence how other teams prepare.
 

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,769
Reaction score
10,146
Golson is an average runner? Ok bro. 3 TDs (3rd QB in school history). Yeah pretty average

I think that what most are getting at when saying that about Golson is, he doesn't have top end speed. He's not Marcus Mariota where he's a threat to take it 80 to the house. However he's exceptionally quick and is very good in the 5-20 range. One reason why he's so good in the red zone because he's just making people miss not out running them.
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
12 carries for 41 yards is a 3.4 yard per carry average. That's absolutely average, if not a little below average.



^^this^^

I wasn't meaning to be overly critical of him, I was just stating my opinion that, as a pure runner, he is pretty average. He'd be the 4th tailback on this team, without a doubt. But he doesn't have to be a great runner, to influence how other teams prepare.

Running out of the pocket is obviously very different than getting the ball and running down hill.

He is so quick on his feet, he has awesome change of speed, he reads blocks, and he is very decisive. The perfect skill set for a pass-first, dual-threat QB.

But I bet he wouldn't be the 4th best RB. Russell, Carlisle, and Zaire would all be ahead of him! :)
 

irishfaith

New member
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
You can spit out those stats all you want. Golson was superb at extending plays on the run. When it comes to running QB's I feel he is elite at running around. He may not be a burner but his arm is incredible. Get fellows I am not trying to argue, but I like our QB!
 

irishfan

Irish Hoops Mod
Messages
7,205
Reaction score
607
-- Pass protection was so inconsistent. Wasn't impressed by Elmer. This has to be cleaned up for next week or we're not winning.
-- Farley/Schmidt were pleasant surprises. And neither one played well. Pretty indicative of their skill level. They're backups at this level.
-- We NEED KVR back. No more Farley in the slot. He's a liability. Luke and Riggs were great today. Those two along with KVR would be our best group of CBs in a very long time. We can't win 10 games with Farley playing every snap like he did today.
-- Most wouldn't have envisioned saying this last year, but we desperately need Collinsworth back and healthy. Shumate is an accident waiting to happen in coverage, and Baratti doesn't exactly make our depth look too strong.


Besides those things, I was pleased with the game today and think we've got a great shot next week against Michigan. Loved seeing Golson air it out, and the three RBs on offense. Bryant will get the most carries this season. Defensively, it was nice to see the true frosh out there and looking good.
 

Riddickulous

"That" Guy
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
8,325
For all the talk about Chris Brown being our #1 WR, I'm a little surprised he wasn't more involved today.
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
I wasn't meaning to be overly critical of him, I was just stating my opinion that, as a pure runner, he is pretty average. He'd be the 4th tailback on this team, without a doubt. But he doesn't have to be a great runner, to influence how other teams prepare.

He absolutely would be ahead of Cam. No offense to Cam, but if he wasn't so good in pass protection, he would barely see the field now that Bryant is in the rotation.

Just because he isn't ripping off 40 yard runs, doesn't mean that he doesn't run well. Every time he took off today, he did exactly what was needed on the play. He is a pass first QB, by design. He doesn't just take off when the play breaks, he either steps up or kicks to the sidelines to look downfield.

Golson is not an average runner. He has speed and an above average ability to get people to miss.
 

irishfaith

New member
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
Speaking of RBs; who so you guys like more? It's tough but I think Folston is pretty slick. Bryant seems like he is real physical. And coach Kelly mentioned Riggs being gassed but did anyone else want to see him get another crack at a return. Bring on Michigan.
 

KPENN

Well-known member
Staff member
Messages
13,017
Reaction score
11,343
golson.0.gif
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
Good game. Having sat through many shaky openers vs. opponents comparable to or worse than Rice, I'll take it being over at halftime any year.

Will admit a bit of concern about the DL. It's to be expected, of course, but I don't really feel like we have any playmakers on the pass rush. Spoiled I guess after years of Tuitt and Shembo and Nix, but I'm not sure who there's going to get in after the QB. Day's a warrior but he's not a game-changing pass rusher. Neither is Rochell. Maybe Okwara and hopefully Ishaq soon. Will say I'm looking forward to the future with Trumbetti and Blankenship.

Otherwise I thought the defense played well. Rice couldn't really run much, for a running team, and mostly moved the ball via mixups in the defensive backfield. I like to think those will get ironed out. Long run I'd rather see Shumate starting than Collinsworth anyway, because I want our best athletes on the field and I love the way Shumate hits people. We shall see.

On offense, I got no complaints. It's amazing what can happen when you're able to move the ball. Games can jump from "14-10 close" to "28-10 over" with a quickness and I'm looking forward to watching our O Line and those backs wear down some quality opponents over the course of this season. I do wish we had more WRs with the ball skills and instincts of TJ Jones, but we've got a lot of options and a QB who makes plays, and that's better than the alternative
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,389
Reaction score
5,814
I miss big Lou and Tuitt. I hope this defensive front doesn't become an issue.

#5 being back is GREAT!
 

Grahambo

Varsity Club Member
Messages
4,259
Reaction score
2,606
Got damn it, what a beauty of a game. No need to state the obvious.

Love thee, Notre Dame.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

ndftbl

Pleasured Via Sock Puppet
Messages
280
Reaction score
35
You can spit out those stats all you want. Golson was superb at extending plays on the run. When it comes to running QB's I feel he is elite at running around. He may not be a burner but his arm is incredible. Get fellows I am not trying to argue, but I like our QB!

Agree.

From neutral Yahoo Sports:

Everett Golson: It had been exactly 600 days since quarterback Everett Golson last suited up for Notre Dame, yet the redshirt junior showed no signs of rust. In a 48-17 win, Golson, back after sitting out last season due to an academic violation, threw for 295 yards and two touchdowns while adding 41 yards and three more scores on the ground. His last game action came in the Irish's national title game loss to Alabama in January 2013, but on Saturday, Golson looked at ease from the start. His performance gives ND fans something to be excited about moving forward.

and again: https://sports.yahoo.com/news/golson-leads-no-17-irish-225722024--ncaaf.html
 
Last edited:

Grahambo

Varsity Club Member
Messages
4,259
Reaction score
2,606
Making some tacos so I'll add more in a bit but there is a clear difference in Golson. His understanding of the game and reacting to what he sees is different. That should stick regardless of who we play.


Not sure if mentioned but outstanding opening line.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top