Politics

Politics

  • Obama

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • Romney

    Votes: 172 48.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 13.1%
  • a:3:{i:1637;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:1637;s:6:"nodeid";s:7:"2882145";s:5:"title";s:5:"Obama";s:5:"

    Votes: 130 36.9%

  • Total voters
    352

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
898
Reaction score
1,287
A quick Google on voteriders.org



If you want to vote, you'll find away.
I'll be fine to vote, I have all my paperwork. I'm concerned for someone like my wife, who was adopted by her step dad and changed her name multiple times. Or for people who have changed their name but unable to update their birth certificate to match. This law doesn't fix a problem it creates additional ones
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,724
Could it be that Tulsi is holding a bit of a grudge over being labeled a Russian asset? Was this her #1 objective coming in?

An ounce of FAFO for once would be nice but I expect zero people to serve jail time and would not be surprised if the number of arrests from this was less than 1.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,591
Reaction score
20,044
Could it be that Tulsi is holding a bit of a grudge over being labeled a Russian asset? Was this her #1 objective coming in?

An ounce of FAFO for once would be nice but I expect zero people to serve jail time and would not be surprised if the number of arrests from this was less than 1.
I haven't had a chance to read up on it, but my initial reaction to the headlines, is this is like the Trump impeachment. A total waste of time and money.
 

NDWarrior

Well-known member
Messages
3,011
Reaction score
2,422
Orchestrated spectacle and waste of time distraction... And Tulsi needs to get on DJT and New Right's good side again as she contradicted their opinion on the threat of Iranian nukes. She needs to prove she can stick to the script as written by the New Right and her loyalty to them and DJT. The one thing that is dangerous about it is that she using words in her press release such as "treasonous conspiracy" which just might cause some mouth breathers to do something stupid.
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,724
I haven't had a chance to read up on it, but my initial reaction to the headlines, is this is like the Trump impeachment. A total waste of time and money.

So just politics as usual to undermine a duly elected president?

Trump impeachment wasn't a waste - totally undermined his first term and weakened his re-election.
 

NDWarrior

Well-known member
Messages
3,011
Reaction score
2,422
Nothing to process - It's a joke. She got slapped down as not on board with the Trump and the New Right team on Iran bombings and now she's trying to prove her mettle and that she does indeed belong to the New Right Club. Waste of time and news space. Move along... Nothing to see here.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,105
Reaction score
12,943
Nothing to process - It's a joke. She got slapped down as not on board with the Trump and the New Right team on Iran bombings and now she's trying to prove her mettle and that she does indeed belong to the New Right Club. Waste of time and news space. Move along... Nothing to see here.
Even if it's all 100% true Obama is immune thanks to Trump anyways.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,591
Reaction score
20,044
Even if it's all 100% true Obama is immune thanks to Trump anyways.
I’ll wait to see what develops, but If it’s true, the damage to the Democratic Party will be almost irreparable. Particularly when Obama is their Golden Boy.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,385
The timing of the Obamagate stuff certainly feels like a distraction from the Epstein case. That said, I thought the first time around that the spying allegations were bad, along with all the pearl clutching over democracy being desecrated as a result of the overblown Russia stuff. The truth was Schiff and others in the party knew the Russia allegations were trumped up from the start, and they pushed the narrative anyway because Trump was rolling towards a 2nd term prior to the pandemic.
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,724
Nothing to process - It's a joke. She got slapped down as not on board with the Trump and the New Right team on Iran bombings and now she's trying to prove her mettle and that she does indeed belong to the New Right Club. Waste of time and news space. Move along... Nothing to see here.

Confirmation bias - got it.
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,724
The timing of the Obamagate stuff certainly feels like a distraction from the Epstein case. That said, I thought the first time around that the spying allegations were bad, along with all the pearl clutching over democracy being desecrated as a result of the overblown Russia stuff. The truth was Schiff and others in the party knew the Russia allegations were trumped up from the start, and they pushed the narrative anyway because Trump was rolling towards a 2nd term prior to the pandemic.

This was before Trump even took office. The sitting President colluded with intel agencies and his political party to frame the incoming duly elected president. The J6 handwringers should be up in arms over this whole peaceful transfer of power thing.
 

NDWarrior

Well-known member
Messages
3,011
Reaction score
2,422

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,724
You can bully all you want but anyone with half a brain and who has the ability to do some critical thinking can see how ridiculous and unsupported this accusation is Gabbard releases more Russia documents, prompting concerns over intelligence sources And she has compromised and endangered intelligence sources and methods by declassifying and releasing these documents. Said it before and will say it again, she’s a drone

She's a drone but you can't admit you were fooled on the Russia collusion hoax nearly a decade later. No pattern there when it comes to trying to label Tulsi a Russian asset too.

I can admit I was fooled on WMD hoax. Pisses me off they pulled that one off. Maybe that is why I didn't buy it in 2016 when the same cast of characters was pushing another hoax - a ridiculous one at that. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Worst of all is Dems propensity to just rail incessantly accusing others of exactly what they are doing with impunity.

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”​

― Mark Twain
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,436
Reaction score
5,142
Even if it's all 100% true Obama is immune thanks to Trump anyways.
Agreed. I mean by any clear reading of the Presidential Immunity case, this would be something you’d be immune for, and bringing Obama to trial even if you think he is guilty (which I am not that convinced that he is) would be purely for political theater (read: politicization of the DOJ)
 
Last edited:

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,359
Reaction score
5,709
What happened in 2021? I guess EW stuffed themselves with too much horse dewormer to remember.
 

NDWarrior

Well-known member
Messages
3,011
Reaction score
2,422
She's a drone but you can't admit you were fooled on the Russia collusion hoax nearly a decade later. No pattern there when it comes to trying to label Tulsi a Russian asset too.

I can admit I was fooled on WMD hoax. Pisses me off they pulled that one off. Maybe that is why I didn't buy it in 2016 when the same cast of characters was pushing another hoax - a ridiculous one at that. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Worst of all is Dems propensity to just rail incessantly accusing others of exactly what they are doing with impunity.

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”​

― Mark Twain

Dude, I don't care about what-isms and all that shit. I believe Democrats for sure also do things we don't like - like hiding Biden to keep his early dementia a secret - but I don't give two shits about Russian Hoaxes - The 2016 one or this one. My main focus and why I'm paying more attention these days is the fact that this current admin is not a Ronald Reagan or GW Bush, or Bill Clinton one - This admin in power is a crazed New Right coalition that is looking to reshape the American form of government (establish an Autocracy) and American society (remake it as Originalist and National Christian). Meaning I don't give a fat flying fuck about "Liberal Dems" or Maga (which are just a group of brainwashed Republicans who have been persuaded to blame everything wrong in this country on those Liberal Dems.

There is no longer a two-party system. I would only acknowledge that there is if there is actually a free and fair 2026 election, but I'm not counting on that. Your and others' rants about "what about (insert Libs, Dems, etc.)" and the crazy "Lunatic Left" - They are meaningless; because that implies there is still a Republican and Democrats two-party system. That has pretty much vanished at this point if you're paying attention. And if you think "Awesome, fuck the Dems!" Think again, because NO ONE will be immune from feeling the brunt of arbitrary executive orders and new oppressive legal measures we don't like. This New Right - when it's even more deeply entrenched - will not give two fucks that you voted for Trump and Vance and have your red Maga hat. It will be "do as I say" and there's gonna be a lot of "saying" that you and everyone in this country ain't gonna like. Because an Autocratic governmental system can't survive without complete control, i.e., one party in control that will keep the Democratic party around for show, and where the elections only go one way.

You run a small business that is devastated by ICE taking your work crew away - Fuck you - That's how it is! Oh, you don't like the new Central Bank Digital Currency where the government oversees and monitors all your digital financial transactions - So sad, too bad, that's how it goes now. You don't like that the admin cut emergency and weather services and FEMA and as a result, you lost your home in a sudden (and without warning) flood - Get over it dude, that's how it is! I know I can't convince you, but every day - as we're distracted by this admin's spectacles and hoaxes - we get a little closer to it... Executive orders keep being fired off, Judges keep ruling in the admin's favor, ICE keeps getting as big as an army, and reconciliation packages (planned for every quarter) and rescission packages keep getting passed to continually cut program spending and cancel approved appropriations. One day, that next law or action against you, or the next tragedy that impacts you will finally make you see the light.
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,724
Dude, I don't care about what-isms and all that shit. I believe Democrats for sure also do things we don't like - like hiding Biden to keep his early dementia a secret - but I don't give two shits about Russian Hoaxes - The 2016 one or this one. My main focus and why I'm paying more attention these days is the fact that this current admin is not a Ronald Reagan or GW Bush, or Bill Clinton one - This admin in power is a crazed New Right coalition that is looking to reshape the American form of government (establish an Autocracy) and American society (remake it as Originalist and National Christian). Meaning I don't give a fat flying fuck about "Liberal Dems" or Maga (which are just a group of brainwashed Republicans who have been persuaded to blame everything wrong in this country on those Liberal Dems.

There is no longer a two-party system. I would only acknowledge that there is if there is actually a free and fair 2026 election, but I'm not counting on that. Your and others' rants about "what about (insert Libs, Dems, etc.)" and the crazy "Lunatic Left" - They are meaningless; because that implies there is still a Republican and Democrats two-party system. That has pretty much vanished at this point if you're paying attention. And if you think "Awesome, fuck the Dems!" Think again, because NO ONE will be immune from feeling the brunt of arbitrary executive orders and new oppressive legal measures we don't like. This New Right - when it's even more deeply entrenched - will not give two fucks that you voted for Trump and Vance and have your red Maga hat. It will be "do as I say" and there's gonna be a lot of "saying" that you and everyone in this country ain't gonna like. Because an Autocratic governmental system can't survive without complete control, i.e., one party in control that will keep the Democratic party around for show, and where the elections only go one way.

You run a small business that is devastated by ICE taking your work crew away - Fuck you - That's how it is! Oh, you don't like the new Central Bank Digital Currency where the government oversees and monitors all your digital financial transactions - So sad, too bad, that's how it goes now. You don't like that the admin cut emergency and weather services and FEMA and as a result, you lost your home in a sudden (and without warning) flood - Get over it dude, that's how it is! I know I can't convince you, but every day - as we're distracted by this admin's spectacles and hoaxes - we get a little closer to it... Executive orders keep being fired off, Judges keep ruling in the admin's favor, ICE keeps getting as big as an army, and reconciliation packages (planned for every quarter) and rescission packages keep getting passed to continually cut program spending and cancel approved appropriations. One day, that next law or action against you, or the next tragedy that impacts you will finally make you see the light.

This sure rhymes with me during the Obama years. I am smelling a lot of libertarian principles in this rant too. Ten years from now I will welcome you to the dark side young apprentice. Look up Convention of States - I don't see election of federal officials getting us where we need to go whether its a one, two or ten party system.
 

NDWarrior

Well-known member
Messages
3,011
Reaction score
2,422
This sure rhymes with me during the Obama years. I am smelling a lot of libertarian principles in this rant too. Ten years from now I will welcome you to the dark side young apprentice. Look up Convention of States - I don't see election of federal officials getting us where we need to go whether its a one, two or ten party system.
Yep, Article V Convention of States. I’ve been following that p sr past few months. What about it? If you’re a fan of that happening, you’re crazy. That will undoubtedly will become a runaway Constitutional Convention and it won’t end well. These New Right kooks will have deeply intertwining Christian Nationalism and all kinds of amendments to pit white men only in the drivers seat for voting and holding office with very extended terms. If it were to happen, it would cement an Autocracy in place for the US for a long time into the future. It would rip apart our Constitution and Republic and would result in an abomination. Not sure what good you think will come out of it?
 
Last edited:

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,724
Yep, Article V Convention of States. I’ve been following that p sr past few months. What about it? If you’re a fan of that happening, you’re crazy. That will undoubtedly will become a runaway Constitutional Convention and it won’t end well. These New Right cooks will have deeply intertwining Christian Nationalism and all kinds of amendments to pit white men only in the drivers seat for voting and holding office with very extended terms. If it were to happen, it would cement an Autocracy in place for the US for a long time into the future. It would rip apart our Constitution and Republic and would result in an abomination. Not sure what good you think will come out of it?

"Article V of the U.S. Constitution gives states the power to call a convention to propose amendments. It takes 34 states to call the convention and 38 to ratify any amendments that are proposed. Our convention would only allow the states to discuss amendments that, “limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, impose fiscal restraints, and place term limits on federal officials.”

Wouldn't it be worth it for term limits alone? Thought that was an 80/20 issue. Fiscal restraints on feds - I'm not sure what "new right cooks" are (do you mean kooks?) or what Christian Nationalism has to do with a balanced budget amendment. It sounds like your social feeds are a hoot. I agree Autocracy has been a problem even before Obama said he just needed a phone and a pen (maybe you are too young to remember that).

If you fear these boogey men weaponizing the federal government you should be in favor of reducing the scale and scope of the federal government. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
 

NDWarrior

Well-known member
Messages
3,011
Reaction score
2,422
"Article V of the U.S. Constitution gives states the power to call a convention to propose amendments. It takes 34 states to call the convention and 38 to ratify any amendments that are proposed. Our convention would only allow the states to discuss amendments that, “limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, impose fiscal restraints, and place term limits on federal officials.”

Wouldn't it be worth it for term limits alone? Thought that was an 80/20 issue. Fiscal restraints on feds - I'm not sure what "new right cooks" are (do you mean kooks?) or what Christian Nationalism has to do with a balanced budget amendment. It sounds like your social feeds are a hoot. I agree Autocracy has been a problem even before Obama said he just needed a phone and a pen (maybe you are too young to remember that).

If you fear these boogey men weaponizing the federal government you should be in favor of reducing the scale and scope of the federal government. Don't hate the player, hate the game.

Yes, I understand what Article V is and I'm sorry but yes with these New Right Kooks (thank you, fixed it), this CC will become a runaway convention of craziness as it will go far beyond limiting terms and balanced budget amendments. "Boogey men" and "weaponizing the federal government?" This is not Social media stuff - Are you not doing your own research on what's going on? These kooks are doing the exact opposite of reducing Federal government reach. They creating executive orders on the daily that are oppressively extending their power and control over states - The only thing they're reducing are entitlements (the amount of which can always be debated). And an Article V convention - especially with no formal, written process for how the states will elect their reps to the convention or how it would work, other than the final voting regulations we know about to pass new Amendments. It would be co-opted by the leaders and ideology of people like Kevin Roberts, Russell Vought, Stephen Miller, and would be infiltrated with a ton of National Christian company men. What comes out of that will not even be close to resembling a Constitutional Republic. Sorry, what's being cooked right now is and will not be anything like any of our previous administrations in our nation's history... Not like any of them. And there will not be any evidence of Libertarianism if that's what you're getting it. They will be looking to bend the convention to their ideas and will be looking to create a Christian Theocracy where white men rule (in every sense of the word). WTF do you think are behind whipping out these executive orders and the white nationalism rhetoric and actions (like building an ICE army)? It's not any devout Reagan Republicans or Libertarians, and certainly not Trump (if as he had any clue how to do that). "I'm not sure... what Christian Nationalism has to do with a balanced budget amendment." Man, you are extremely naive if you think that's the only kind of thing that's going to go down at an Article V CC with these kooks in control. You better start doing your research..
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,724
Yes, I understand what Article V is and I'm sorry but yes with these New Right Kooks (thank you, fixed it), this CC will become a runaway convention of craziness as it will go far beyond limiting terms and balanced budget amendments. "Boogey men" and "weaponizing the federal government?" This is not Social media stuff - Are you not doing your own research on what's going on? These kooks are doing the exact opposite of reducing Federal government reach. They creating executive orders on the daily that are oppressively extending their power and control over states - The only thing they're reducing are entitlements (the amount of which can always be debated). And an Article V convention - especially with no formal, written process for how the states will elect their reps to the convention or how it would work, other than the final voting regulations we know about to pass new Amendments. It would be co-opted by the leaders and ideology of people like Kevin Roberts, Russell Vought, Stephen Miller, and would be infiltrated with a ton of National Christian company men. What comes out of that will not even be close to resembling a Constitutional Republic. Sorry, what's being cooked right now is and will not be anything like any of our previous administrations in our nation's history... Not like any of them. And there will not be any evidence of Libertarianism if that's what you're getting it. They will be looking to bend the convention to their ideas and will be looking to create a Christian Theocracy where white men rule (in every sense of the word). WTF do you think are behind whipping out these executive orders and the white nationalism rhetoric and actions (like building an ICE army)? It's not any devout Reagan Republicans or Libertarians, and certainly not Trump (if as he had any clue how to do that). "I'm not sure... what Christian Nationalism has to do with a balanced budget amendment." Man, you are extremely naive if you think that's the only kind of thing that's going to go down at an Article V CC with these kooks in control. You better start doing your research..

I agree that Trump and Republicans are just as bad as Dems in exploding federal spending - just in different ways.

Convention proposes amendments. Amendments go to states. State legislatures vote on amendments. The kooky shit you describe would never pass states. You might want to look at Obama's phone and pen if you want to pitch a fit about EOs.

Here is the Resolution being passed:

Whereas, the Founders of our Constitution empowered State Legislators to be guardians of liberty against future abuses of power by the federal government, and Whereas, the federal government has created a crushing national debt through improper and imprudent spending, and Whereas, the federal government has invaded the legitimate roles of the states through the manipulative process of federal mandates, most of which are unfunded to a great extent, and Whereas, the federal government has ceased to live under a proper interpretation of the Constitution of the United States, and Whereas, it is the solemn duty of the States to protect the liberty of our people—particularly for the generations to come—by proposing Amendments to the Constitution of the United States through a Convention of the States under Article V for the purpose of restraining these and related abuses of power, Be it therefore resolved by the legislature of the State of ________________: Section 1. The legislature of the State of ____________________________________________ hereby applies to Congress, under the provisions of Article V of the Constitution of the United States, for the calling of a convention of the states limited to proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for its officials and for members of Congress. Section 2. The secretary of state is hereby directed to transmit copies of this application to the President and Secretary of the United States Senate and to the Speaker and Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, and copies to the members of the said Senate and House of Representatives from this State; also to transmit copies hereof to the presiding officers of each of the legislative houses in the several States, requesting their cooperation. Section 3. This application constitutes a continuing application in accordance with Article V of the Constitution of the United States until the legislatures of at least two-thirds of the several states have made applications on the same subject.


Passed in 19 states, passed on chamber in four more and active legislation this year in another 20. Well on the way to 34 states needed to call a convention. Convention of States advancing Autocracy is a funny stance to take IMO.
 
Top