NDFANnSouthWest
We are ND!
- Messages
- 4,806
- Reaction score
- 199
what a disaster..if this was a corporation everyone would of been fired! even the CEO!
Anyone get some free pizza at the Opt-Out tailgate this weekend?
Generation Opportunity brings its “Opt-Out” tailgate to Notre Dame
Obama: Republicans...hostage taking terrorists
Obama: Iran...let's give them the benefit of the doubt
Found on twitter today
what a disaster..if this was a corporation everyone would of been fired! even the CEO!
And a day removed from more rhetoric...here we go: More delays, but more burden upon small business to get a tax credit...GREAT.
From the Washington Post...
With this new delay, small businesses will likely see little change in the way they purchase health insurance until 2015. They will, however, need to purchase one of the plans sold on the SHOP marketplace, through a broker, if they want to access a health law tax credit available to employers with fewer than 25 employees.
That tax credit first became available in 2010 regardless of where a company purchased coverage. Beginning in 2014, companies will need to buy through the marketplace to continue receiving that financial assistance, worth as much as 50 percent of their workers' premiums. In years past, the tax credit was capped at 35 percent of workers' premiums.
The federal delay effects the 36 states where the federal government is running the health insurance exchange. It does not change the small business options in the 14 states and the District of Columbia that are running their own exchanges.
The White House announced last April a one-year delay to the "consumer choice" function in the SHOP exchange, which would allow each employee to pick their own insurance plan, pushing that functionality back until the 2015 open enrollment season.
That delay was followed with another setback in September when the White House announced that online shopping in the small business exchange would not be available when open enrollment started in October.
Under the new Obama administration proposal, small businesses will now have to "go directly to an agent, broker or to an insurance company with plans certified by the Marketplace," the Q&A document states. "The insurer must agree to offer direct enrollment in SHOP coverage and to conduct enrollment according to HHS requirements."
The agent or broker will "help the employer fill out a paper application for SHOP eligibility and send it in to the SHOP Marketplace."
Actually, upper management and BOD's would get huge severance packages and new jobs/ positions running other companies into the ground..
Anybody that compares the private sector to the public sector as an apples to apples type comparison lacks a basic understanding of civics and or public policy in my opinion. ..
As to the ACA. The website shortcomings say more about the federal procurement and contracting process than anything. Cluster f*$ks like some of what is happening now come with the territory. Instead of looking for solutions however, the GOP per usual wants to stamp its collective feet and throw the baby out with the bathwater. As to the States that failed to set up their own exchanges they should share in the culpability of this being a mess and put all that "States" right BS they've been spewing to bed. Here was a chance to shine and show they didn't "need the Fed" holding their hands every step of the way and instead they chose to do nothing.
...all of you share the same rock? Many...many...many more people negatively impacted by this...I personally know five or six families that have obtained affordable policies through the California exchange website.
We all know there have been problems with the website and other parts of the rollout. What good comes of posting every new article that states what we already know? I don't recall the Dems naming each soldier who was killed in the Iraqi war that was started by the GOP president. How 'bout we talk about this in 6 months when the hyperbolic nonsense fades a bit. By then, we'll know how many actually signed up and if it is helping or hurting. This is pointless.
We all know there have been problems with the website and other parts of the rollout. What good comes of posting every new article that states what we already know? I don't recall the Dems naming each soldier who was killed in the Iraqi war that was started by the GOP president. How 'bout we talk about this in 6 months when the hyperbolic nonsense fades a bit. By then, we'll know how many actually signed up and if it is helping or hurting. This is pointless.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/98BIu9dpwHU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I've said a lot about automation and technology replacing jobs on here. Goodbye deliverymen.
well this and autonomous transportation ala Google car. Think about public transit jobs in places like NY city. If I can climb in my own vehicle, fire up my laptop, drink a cup of coffee and conduct business or just sleep...and it delivers me to my office...w/o requiring me to pay attention...why would I take the train/bus?
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/98BIu9dpwHU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I've said a lot about automation and technology replacing jobs on here. Goodbye deliverymen.
What if we took the same approach to Henry Ford and the automobile? We'd still be in horse and buggies.
So delivery guys 10-15 years from now might no longer be needed. What about the people needed to design and build these droids? The people to maintain them? The people required to negotiate the contracts/ pricing on them? The people required to manage the logistics?
I don't know if this is a good or bad idea for the long term, but I'm all for innovation. If companies (big or small) find new ways to save money, they will.
We're not at I Robot...yet.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/98BIu9dpwHU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I've said a lot about automation and technology replacing jobs on here. Goodbye deliverymen.
I've never seen it or read it. But the question is simple, what happened when the unemployment rate is 25%?
If you reduce 1,000,000 uneducated jobs to 100,000 uneducated jobs, and in the process create with 200,000 educated jobs and 100,000 uneducated jobs (for all of the things you just mentioned)...there are still 800,000 jobs lost. What will those people do for a living while the GOP is simultaneously saying they're unemployed simply because they're lazy?
Probably provide some sort of good or service to the 200,000 educated employees.
If you reduce 1,000,000 uneducated jobs to 100,000 uneducated jobs, and in the process create with 200,000 educated jobs and 100,000 uneducated jobs (for all of the things you just mentioned)...there are still 800,000 jobs lost. What will those people do for a living while the GOP is simultaneously saying they're unemployed simply because they're lazy?
You mean like McDonalds? Lol
Just checking out my new avatar and Sig.
Oh yeah and the ACA site is working![]()