Politics

Politics

  • Obama

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • Romney

    Votes: 172 48.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 13.1%
  • a:3:{i:1637;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:1637;s:6:"nodeid";s:7:"2882145";s:5:"title";s:5:"Obama";s:5:"

    Votes: 130 36.9%

  • Total voters
    352

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,594
Reaction score
2,009
Summary of this page:

1) Right leaning Christians hate the poor.

2) The GOP gets their rocks off on taking food and healthcare away from the poor.

3) Fixing a lot of roads and bridges (regardless of the need to fix them) will take unemployment from 7.5% to 4% and is the backbone of a strong private sector economy.

4) Any program (regardless of its impact) that makes a leftist feel good about themselves is noble and just, and anyone who opposes such a program hates the poor or likes watching people suffer.

5) Insurance premiums are doubling or tripling in some cases because insurance companies are out to screw people, not because of obamacare. Obamacare sticks it to insurance companies and is the saving grace for the American people.

6) McDonald's is a solid career choice for an adult with a family to feed, and it's McDonald's responsibility to pay their employees $20 an hour. That's social justice.

7) The more people we have dependent on government, the better. Fundamental transformation here we are.
 

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,594
Reaction score
2,009
Our economy/ culture in one brilliant article.

Bob Funk: Where the Jobs Are—and How to Get One
The man who matches companies with workers talks about the skills gap, the harm from ObamaCare, and the incentive not to work. But he'll still find you a job.

By STEPHEN MOORE
Oklahoma City

Here's something you don't often see in Washington: a businessman trying to repeal a law that helps his company. That's Bob Funk's latest mission in life. He's the president and founder of Express Employment Services, the fifth-largest employment agency in America, with annual sales of $2.5 billion and more than 600 franchises across the country. This year he will place nearly half a million workers in jobs.

"ObamaCare has been an absolute boon for my business," he says as we sit in his new office headquarters near downtown Oklahoma City. "I'm making a lot of money thanks to that law. We're up 8% this year. But it's just terrible for the country. I see that firsthand every day."

Why is the health-care law good for Express but bad for the country? "Firms are just very reluctant to hire full-time workers," Mr. Funk says. "So they are taking on more temporary help, which is what we do." ObamaCare imposes new mandates and penalties on companies with more than 50 full-time employees—and even those working 30 hours a week are considered full-time.

He quickly adds: "The problem isn't just ObamaCare, though. It's the entire regulatory assault on employers coming out of Washington—everything from the EEOC"—the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission hits companies hard when employees claim age, race or sex discrimination—"to the Dodd-Frank monstrosity. Employers are living in a state of fear."

Mr. Funk is worth listening to because few people are as intimately connected to the U.S. job market. Express acts as an employment version of Match.com, linking businesses with job seekers. The jobs he fills range from CFOs and trained technicians to secretaries, retail clerks and construction workers. The pay for Express jobs typically ranges from $13 to $40 an hour.

On Monday, the company will release a report called "The Great Shift" warning that the declining labor-force participation rate has put at risk Americans' future quality of life, especially for millennials "who have quit looking for work." With millions of people giving up job searches, the U.S. labor-participation rate is the lowest in 35 years.

Mr. Funk is happy to lay out many of the report's themes. Perhaps most arresting is his assertion that "anyone who really wants a job in this country can have one." With 20 million Americans unemployed or underemployed, how can that be?

To land and keep a job isn't hard, he says, but you have to meet three conditions: "First you need integrity; second, a strong work ethic; and, third, you have to be able to pass a drug test." If an applicant can meet those minimal qualifications, he says, "I guarantee I can find employers tomorrow who will hire you."

He thinks the notion of the "dead-end job" is poisonous because it shuts down all sense of possibility and ambition. One of his lifelong themes, Mr. Funk says, is that "a job—any job—is by far the best social program in America and the ladder to success."

As a near-lifelong Oklahoman, now 73 years old, Mr. Funk wears a cowboy hat and a cheerful disposition. He started his career training to be a Methodist preacher, but he jokes that he was so bad in the pulpit that "after my sermons were over it was like the great awakening." So he turned to business instead, and "now I'm helping workers in this life rather than for eternity."

In 1983 he took out a $150,000 loan to launch Express, and after a brutal first few years—the oil recession crushed the Sooner State in the mid-1980s and nearly put him out of business—the company has multiplied many times in employment and profitability.

The hundreds of thousands of temporary workers he places in jobs are Express employees. He pays their salary, benefits, and payroll taxes and the firms that hire the workers reimburse Express for those costs plus a commission. This feature of the temporary-worker industry allows companies trying to fill job openings to do so in a way that sidesteps ObamaCare's mandates. After an on-the-job trial of several months, companies often offer the workers permanent positions.

"It's a try it before you buy it model," Mr. Funk explains. The temporary-employment business is booming now because in the fragile economy and, with ObamaCare on the way, companies are skittish about bringing on permanent hires. Some businesses, to remain below the 50-employee level, hire all their additional workers beyond No. 49 through Express. He says other CEOs are so fed up with the new rules that they have asked Express to take over the management of their entire workforce.

Express is also a good indicator of where the U.S. economy is growing and where it's still struggling. The top job growth is in cities like Nashville, Dallas, Austin, Oklahoma City and Indianapolis—cities without forced union rules, and with a pro-growth regulatory and tax climate. He says Michigan and Wisconsin are two states in the upper Midwest that have "really improved their business climate." The slowest state is still California: "They just raised their minimum wage again—it's just a killer for new jobs."

The primary jobs problem today, Mr. Funk says, is that too many workers are functionally unemployable because of attitude, behavior or lack of the most basic work skills. One discouraging statistic is that only about one of six workers who comes to Express seeking employment makes the cut. He recites a company statistic that about one in four applicants can't even pass a drug test.

"In my 40-some years in this business, the biggest change I've witnessed is the erosion of the American work ethic. It just isn't there today like it used to be," Mr. Funk says. Asked to define "work ethic," he replies that it's fairly simple but vital on-the-job behavior, such as showing up on time, being conscientious and productive in every task, showing a willingness to get your hands dirty and at times working extra hours. These attributes are essential, he says, because if low-level employees show a willingness to work hard, "most employers will gladly train them with the skills to fill higher-paying jobs."

He fears that too many of the young millennials who come knocking on his door view a paycheck as a kind of entitlement, not something to be earned. He is also concerned that the trendy concept of "life-balancing" is putting work second behind leisure.

"I guess I'm a little prejudiced to the immigrants and especially Hispanics," he says. "They have an amazing work ethic. They don't want handouts and are grateful to have a job. Our company has a great success rate with these workers." This focus on work effort is seldom, if ever, discussed by policy makers or labor economists when they ponder what to do about unemployment. To most liberals, the very topic is taboo and is disparaged as blaming the economy's victims.

When pressed to explain what Washington can do to get Americans back on the job, Mr. Funk says the first step would be to start shrinking the "vast social welfare state programs that have become a substitute for work. There's a prevalent attitude of a lot of this generation of workers that the government will always be there to take care of them. It's hard to get people to take entry-level jobs when they can get unemployment benefits, health care, food stamps and the rest."

This week during the food-stamp debate in Congress, Democrats voted unanimously against work requirements and ridiculed Republicans who suggested that the expansion of food stamps to 47 million Americans has discouraged working. The Democrats are living in a fantasy world, according to Mr. Funk. He points to Congress's decision in 2009 to increase unemployment-insurance benefits to 90 weeks or more as "a policy that held a lot of people out of the workforce until the checks stopped coming. We saw that here very clearly."

The most abused government program, he says, is disability insurance and the 14 million Americans who now collect these benefits. Express has found that over half of the disability claims brought by its workers have turned out to be fraudulent. "We win 90% of the disability cases that we challenge in court," Mr. Funk says.

Another big hurdle is the widening skills deficit. At any given time, Mr. Funk says, Express has as many as 20,000 jobs the company can't fill because workers don't have the skills required. His advice to young people who are looking for a solid career is to get training in accounting (thanks to Dodd-Frank's huge expansion of paperwork), information technology, manufacturing-robotics programming, welding and engineering. He's mystified why Express has so much trouble filling thousands of information-technology jobs when so many young, working-age adults are computer literate.

He blames public schools and universities for the skills mismatch. Young people looking for a financially secure future might want to heed one of his favorite pieces of cautionary advice: "If you've got a college degree in psych, poly-sci or sociology, sorry, I can't help you find a job." He urges greater emphasis on vocational and practical skills training in schools, universities and junior colleges.

With so many ideas about how to help get the country on track, Mr. Funk might seem ripe to enter politics, but he already made one electoral foray—he was a local school-board member for 11 years—and found it an exercise in pure frustration. Bringing his pay-for-performance values to the board, he spent years futilely trying to get rid of bad teachers and to reward "the 30% that are really good."

He says "teacher tenure is by far the most corrupt social institution in our time, because it doesn't reward excellence or weed out bad teachers." The teachers union had operational control of the school board, and Mr. Funk couldn't get them to budge. He says the union celebrated when he left the board.

If Bob Funk's warnings about unemployment and the jobs market are accurate, then almost everything Washington is doing to address the problem is either beside the point or counterproductive. And the ObamaCare-driven march toward the 30-hour workweek continues. "Our franchises across the country are seeing a definite demand for more part time workers," he says.

How will American companies keep up with competitors in Asia, where employees often work 50 and 60 hours a week? Mr. Funk predicts that the temporary-employment industry could nearly double its share of the U.S. workforce, to about 4%, after ObamaCare fully takes effect. That's good for him, but awful for America.
 

Black Irish

Wise Guy
Messages
3,769
Reaction score
602
Conservatives: "If you allow the wealthy to keep more of their income, they will spend it on consumer goods, invest it, and use it to start/expand businesses. It'll be good for the economy. Sound good?"

Liberals: "NO! That's trickle down Reaganomics. It won't work; it's just an excuse to not tax rich people high enough."

Liberals: "Here's what we should do. Let's pass a jobs act that creates a bunch of temporary jobs (ends after about a year) that will pay top dollar, prevailing union rate (driving up the cost of infrastructure projects). That money will get pumped into the economy (for a short while) when these new workers spend it on consumer goods and other things (mostly household bills, not creating anything new and lasting)."

Other Liberals: "YEAH! Sounds great! Let's do it!"

Conservatives: "Wait. What?"
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
Yep...you are exactly right...Christians on the right side of the political spactrum HATE poor people...you figured them out for sure

I would love to see the numbers of Christian right who donate, volunteer in direct response to "poor" issues IN THIS COUNTRY, as apposed to the secular left. Just because you line up tax dollars doesn't mean you put your skin in the game...just sayin'
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/qSjGouBmo0M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Beautiful.
 

potownhero

New member
Messages
164
Reaction score
34
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/qSjGouBmo0M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Beautiful.

That guy is a complete stooge.

All I had to hear him say was that Medicare was a good example of cost efficiency to know that he's a hack.

Hospitals cost-shift from Medicare to Private Insurers. Get it? Most hospitals lose money on Medicare Patients.

So what this stooge is arguing for is something that is financially unsustainable. Therefore, something has to suffer - resulting in either 1) worse care or 2) less care.

What a moron...unless he is intentionally trying to mislead the useful idiots out there.
 
Messages
11,214
Reaction score
377
What's there to be sorry about? Someone who refuses to earn insurance and didn't have insurance is now insured at the expense of others. The law is working, right?

You made it sound like he also refused to work, since he is so busy playing video games and drinking.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
All I had to hear him say was that Medicare was a good example of cost efficiency to know that he's a hack.

He didn't at all say that. He said they negotiate for cheaper prices, a la European countries.

Hospitals cost-shift from Medicare to Private Insurers. Get it? Most hospitals lose money on Medicare Patients.

Hospitals do, as they are still within the inhospitable (hehe, pun) marketplace.

So what this stooge is arguing for is something that is financially unsustainable.

Except in every other country.

Therefore, something has to suffer - resulting in either 1) worse care or 2) less care.

What a moron...unless he is intentionally trying to mislead the useful idiots out there.

Except you attacked his arguments by misrepresenting his points, which doesn't aid your cause.
 

Irish Houstonian

New member
Messages
2,722
Reaction score
301
He didn't at all say that. He said they negotiate for cheaper prices, a la European countries...

Well, that's also exactly what plans do -- negotiate rates on behalf of its participants. Also, Medicare doesn't really "negotiate" rates. It sets a reimbursement rate, and it's take-it-or-leave-it to a provider.

What I think was being alluded to above is how most providers used Medicare in their business models. Medicare reimbursement is so low that virtually no provider worth its salt can exist on it alone. They stay afloat through private plan reimbursement, and then use Medicare as 'filler', so to speak. The conclusion being that if Medicare replaced all reimbursement in the United States our entire system would collapse.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
I'm not saying that is untrue, I just didn't see him as referencing it in that way. More like speaking to Americans about what is the closest thing to Europeans here in America, in terms of leveraging prices, too low or not.

Of course, why would a someone want medicare patients when the market around them makes the percentage of reimbursement a mere fraction? I get that totally.
 

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
I'm not saying that is untrue, I just didn't see him as referencing it in that way. More like speaking to Americans about what is the closest thing to Europeans here in America, in terms of leveraging prices, too low or not.

Of course, why would a someone want medicare patients when the market around them makes the percentage of reimbursement a mere fraction? I get that totally.

Lets walk down that road.

Private insurance goes away and prices come down and everyone can now afford care. What happens next?

I can predict one thing with a high level of certainty. The very best doctors will go to the highest bidders. They will operate their practice just like this guy.

Cash-only doctors abandon the insurance system - Jun. 11, 2013
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
Lets walk down that road.

Private insurance goes away and prices come down and everyone can now afford care. What happens next?

I can predict one thing with a high level of certainty. The very best doctors will go to the highest bidders. They will operate their practice just like this guy.

Cash-only doctors abandon the insurance system - Jun. 11, 2013

I can't imagine most doctors, especially specialists, having the resources to leave the system in droves. I just can't. Normal economics needs the economies of scale to lower prices, no? It's tough to afford a million-dollar machine when you're not in the system getting so many patients. But then again, I a lot of physicians being able to afford such a switch simply due to charging higher-than-needed rates that are still below the highway robbery-esque insurance prices.

But quoting that article:

The office has negotiated deals for services outside the office. By cutting out the middleman, Nunamaker said he can get a cholesterol test done for $3, versus the $90 the lab company he works with once billed to insurance carriers. An MRI can be had for $400, compared to a typical billed rate of $2,000 or more.

Now Petersen does hernia operations for $5,000 a pop, which includes anesthesia, operating room time and follow-up visits. He negotiates special rates for the anesthesiologist and the operating room, and is able to provide the service for about a third of what a patient might pay otherwise.

Sounds to me like is a homerun success and shows how inelastic demand is within the system, that was 90% of the video's point, no?

Overall I think competition solves the problems the majority of the time, but I'm not opposed to looking at single-payer on a state level. The corporatism of federal Obamacare won't get it done, that's for sure.
 
Last edited:

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
Lets walk down that road.

Private insurance goes away and prices come down and everyone can now afford care. What happens next?

I can predict one thing with a high level of certainty. The very best doctors will go to the highest bidders. They will operate their practice just like this guy.

Cash-only doctors abandon the insurance system - Jun. 11, 2013

I've been looking for someone who did this model...trying to adopt to community model...thank you thank you thank you...
 

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
I can't imagine most doctors, especially specialists, having the resources to leave the system in droves. I just can't. Normal economics needs the economies of scale to lower prices, no? It's tough to afford a million-dollar machine when you're not in the system getting so many patients. But then again, I a lot of physicians being able to afford such a switch simply due to charging higher-than-needed rates that are still below the highway robbery-esque insurance prices.

But quoting that article:





Sounds to me like is a homerun success and shows how inelastic demand is within the system, that was 90% of the video's point, no?

Overall I think competition solves the problems the majority of the time, but I'm not opposed to looking at single-payer on a state level. The corporatism of federal Obamacare won't get it done, that's for sure.

But what will single payer get you? Will single payer be able to eliminate the waste in the system that this particular guy has done? Ideally yes, but I have yet to see a government program work that way.

Additionally, what do you think would happen if this occurred in, say, South Carolina?

Surgery wait finally over as ENT covered by $100m 'bonus' | Sunshine Coast Daily

What about if all the hospitals were sub-standard in the heartland or 20% of the US?

Emergency care in crisis admits NHS regulator - Telegraph

Problem is, there is no one right answer.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
But what will single payer get you? Will single payer be able to eliminate the waste in the system that this particular guy has done? Ideally yes, but I have yet to see a government program work that way.

But isn't that how it works in Europe?

Problem is, there is no one right answer.

And thus we need different solutions for different states, to get a closer answer than the bullshit Obamacare, no? What works in South Carolina won't work in New York, etc.
 

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
But isn't that how it works in Europe?



And thus we need different solutions for different states, to get a closer answer than the bullshit Obamacare, no? What works in South Carolina won't work in New York, etc.

I guess my point of the linked articles was that in societies that already employ single payer on a large scale, there are huge disparities in care.

I know there are disparities in care today and they vary based on locales. But to me, I don't want to wait for a $100m "bonus" from the government so my child can get a ENT surgery like they did in Australia.

I know the retort back to that is, "do you trust the insurance companies" and my answer is simple........not really. However, I have more faith that a quasi private enterprise will act in its own best interest and their interests are better aligned with my interest than the government is aligned with me. But maybe that is the cynical person in me talking where I have yet to see a politician act in any interest other than their own.
 

BobD

Can't get no satisfaction
Messages
7,918
Reaction score
1,034
Ok that's kinda funny.

41409977.jpg
 

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,594
Reaction score
2,009
I'll be the first to say SAT's aren't everything and don't correlate heavily to college success. However, this trend is getting worse. We shouldn't be surprised.

We have cultural problems in education, we're dumbing down the cirriculum and making everyone "equal", and spending more money per pupil than any other country in the world outside Switzerland. Contrary to what many teachers and unions will tell you, money is not the problem or the solution.

By Lynn O'Shaughnessy
MoneyWatch
September 26, 2013, 8:08 AM
High school students' SAT scores continue to slip

The latest SAT test figures released today by the College Board suggest that most freshmen aren't academically prepared for college.

High school seniors who graduated earlier this year generated the exact same scores as last year's crop of test takers. The latest results continue a pattern of stagnating test scores that educators have lamented for years.
The 2013 figures suggest that only 43 percent of SAT takers among this year's freshmen are ready for the academic rigors of college studies.

The average high school senior earned a 496 on the critical reading portion of the test and a 514 on the math section (The highest score possible for each of these sections is 800). Students fared the worst in the writing section, with an average score of 488. While the average composite score of 1498 out of a possible 2400 is identical with last year's result, it's 20 points lower than in 2006, when the SAT writing section was introduced.

Who is ready for college

Students who earn a 1550 on the test, according to the SAT College and Career Readiness Benchmark, have a 65 percent probability of earning a first-year GPA of a B minus or higher. Most of the students who meet the readiness benchmark (78 percent) are enrolled in four-year institutions.

David Coleman, the College Board's president, said the latest batch of stagnant scores represents a "call to action."

"We must dramatically increase the number of students in K-12 who are prepared for college and careers," he said in a statement. "Only by transforming the daily work that students do can we achieve excellence and equity."

That's easier said than done. FairTest.org, which is an opponent of the SAT and state-level programs that focus on K-12 testing, compiled this chart showing how much SAT scores have slipped since 2006:

Students planning to major in some of the liberal arts and sciences performed significantly better than many who are aiming at more vocationally oriented degrees. Students wishing to major in multi/interdisciplinary studies earned the highest combined SAT score (1757), followed by the physical sciences (1673), English language and literature (1665), and social sciences (1661).

Significantly lagging behind were students hoping to major in three of the most popular fields -- education (1442), psychology (1484), and business management and marketing (1497). Some of the lowest scores came from students wanting to major in parks and recreation (1328) and construction trades (1274).
 

potownhero

New member
Messages
164
Reaction score
34
But what will single payer get you? Will single payer be able to eliminate the waste in the system that this particular guy has done? Ideally yes, but I have yet to see a government program work that way.

Ideally the socialist idea of Utopia would exist.
...even though history has proven that otherwise.

But these utopians are smarter than the previous one's, right?

The real question is how much needless suffering will occur before its obvious to the masses? ...and how much it will cost to undo it (both in terms of human and real capital). Maybe society deserves it. We were warned about what happens to those who don't learn about history.

What do you think? Does the ideal societal plan exist? Can it be centrally implemented in a way that best suits each individual better than what each individual could choose on his/her own from a market system? I'd love to hear thoughts on this.
 

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
Ideally the socialist idea of Utopia would exist.
...even though history has proven that otherwise.

But these utopians are smarter than the previous one's, right?

The real question is how much needless suffering will occur before its obvious to the masses? ...and how much it will cost to undo it (both in terms of human and real capital). Maybe society deserves it. We were warned about what happens to those who don't learn about history.

What do you think? Does the ideal societal plan exist? Can it be centrally implemented in a way that best suits each individual better than what each individual could choose on his/her own from a market system? I'd love to hear thoughts on this.

Off the cuff, the simple answer to this is no.

Why? One word.......Greed.

Greed is something that has plagued mankind and will always do so. That is why socialism ultimately fails.

It is the greed of the individual who no longer is happy to have everything equal or is no longer satisfied with the status quo. It is the greed of the businessperson who feels he/she could squeeze just a little bit more profit. It is greed of the politician who will always think about his or her own situation and power before truly serving the people. Mankind is programmed to be naturally greedy.

My thought process is, why fight it? Greed, when properly contained, drives us further as a population than what we could have ever imagined. We need rules and laws to help distinguish "good" greed from "bad" greed, but we need people serving their best interest to move us forward.

Gordon_Gekko.jpg
 

DSully1995

New member
Messages
1,103
Reaction score
74
Greed is only bad in places where government is already involved (not debating the legitimacy of the involvement, just saying it is). In areas without the government, "greed" (the pursuit of profit) can only be achieved through providing the people with the goods and services THEY want. Voluntary Exchange. :)
 

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,594
Reaction score
2,009
Our imperial president either refuses to accept reality or has no problem lying, meanwhile mocking those who dare point out all the problems of this "law."

"Every time they have predicted something not working, it's worked. I mean, they said that these rates would come in real high and everybody's premiums would be sky high. And it turns out, lo and behold, actually, the prices came in lower than we expected -- lower than I predicted. That’s how well competition and choice work." --- Obama in speech today



Study: Insurance costs to soar under Obamacare


(MoneyWatch) Wondering what's going to happen to your health insurance premiums under Obamacare?

New research from the Manhattan Institute estimates that insurance rates for young men will rise by 99 percent. Rates for younger women will rise between 55 percent to 62 percent, according to the right-leaning New York think tank.

Obamacare premium costs vary from state to state, city to city
The precise impact of the new health law is likely to vary markedly from state-to-state, however. That's largely because different states have had different requirements for what had to be included in health insurance policies in the past. The Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, overrides these rules and sets a federal overlay that demands a wide array of mandatory coverages. The Manhattan Institute has drawn up an interactive map that may help forecast the rise in cost for individuals.

These differences mean men will get hammered in North Carolina with an average 305 percent rate hike, while women will suffer in Nebraska, paying an average of 237 percent more. For most people, subsidies in the law will not counteract the rate shock, says co-author of the study Avik Roy, a health care expert and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

"You hear all these excuses from the [Obama] administration -- that people are exaggerating the effect of the law," he says. "But real people are getting notices from their insurers now. My blog is flooded with comments from people saying that they just got a huge premium hike."

The Department of Health and Human Services put out a press release this week forecasting that Obamacare premiums would be 16 percent less than projected. However, the projected costs were estimates that attempted to project the cost of a policy in 2016. Consumers are receiving the real costs in notices from their insurers now only a few weeks before the law is set to go into effect. For healthy consumers who have existing policies, many of the premium hikes are proving massive.

Additionally, the promise that you could keep your old policy, if you liked it, has proved illusory. My insurer, Kaiser Permanente, informed me in a glossy booklet that "At midnight on December 31, we will discontinue your current plan because it will not meet the requirements of the Affordable Care Act." My premium, the letter added, would go from $209 a month to $348, a 66.5 percent increase that will cost $1,668 annually.

What made my plan too substandard to survive under Obamacare? It did not provide maternity benefits. I'm 53 years old. I figure pregnancy would require an act of God. (Incidentally, maternity benefits will be covered on men's policies too. Let's hope medical science comes a long way so you guys can use those benefits.) My policy also did not cover substance abuse treatments or psychiatric care.

Affordable Care Act success hinges on "young invincibles"
"Every one of those provisions sound nice -- they sound like you're protecting the sick and making sure that everyone is covered," Roy said. "But they drive up the cost structure."

Meanwhile, the things that mattered to me -- that I would be able to limit my out-of-pocket costs if I had a catastrophic ailment -- got worse under my new Obamacare policy. My policy, which has always paid 100 percent of the cost of annual check-ups, had a $5,000 annual deductible for sick visits and hospital stays. Once I paid that $5,000, the plan would pay 100 percent of any additional cost. That protected me from economic devastation in the event of a catastrophic illness, such as cancer.

Kaiser's Obamacare policy has a $4,500 deductible, but then covers only 40 percent of medical costs for office visits, hospital stays and drugs. Out-of-pocket expenses aren't capped until the policyholder pays $6,350 annually.

Sure, that's only another $1,350. But it adds to the additional $1,663 that I'm paying in premiums, making my personal cost for Obama care add to $3,018 annually. This, by the way, is the bare-bones policy under Obamacare -- the Bronze plan. Premiums for plans that offer lower deductibles and premiums would cost almost twice as much, according to the Kaiser booklet.

"This is a redistribution of wealth from the healthy to the sick, from the young to the old, from the people who have always had insurance to the uninsured," Roy said.

A standard policy for wellness and catastrophic coverage for an unexpected, unavoidable ailment or accident could have been provided for a fraction of what Obamacare coverage costs, Roy added. "Obama care forces insurers to offer products that carry all sorts of bells and whistles that most people don't want but everyone will now need to pay for."

"Imagine if Congress passed a law that required every car to have a hybrid engine," Roy said. "If you were an environmentalist, you might like that. But you would be dramatically driving up the cost of transportation."
 
Top