IMO, its going to be what the game or opponent calls for. If its a team that he feels like we can come out and be aggressive on then he'll probably speed it up which we saw at times this year. And as the game dictates he'll probably slow it down and eat clock. I don't think BK gives two shits if we play fast and score 50 or we play slow and score 20 as long as we win. I do think Everett's maturation will give BK the opportunity to do different things and one of those is to play fast. Call it and haul it is the term he likes to use.
What kind of tempo will do people seeing the offense have next year. Will BK go with fast pace again or he is he committed to let the clock run and protect the defense mentality for the forseable future?
I don't think BK wants to play at warp speed all the time, because it doesn't fit the team's current identity: a low risk, ball control offense, which complements our smothering defense perfectly. The up-tempo pass-first spread BK ran at Cinci puts a lot of stress on the defense, and it's not necessary to take the risks inherent in that scheme when you can simply run over your opponents.
I do think we'll see more calculated hurry-ups, though. Chip Kelly is a master at doing this: when the defense is fresh and lines up quickly, Oregon slows down and tries to get a good pre-snap read. When the defense is tired and dying for a substitution, they go warp speed (and almost always score). I could definitely see BK doing that as Golson gets more comfortable.
Not sure why he would want to change anything. If the offense was sinply more efficient in the red zone we would have beat every team on our schedule by a pretty comfortable margin with a couple more blowouts, USC being one of them.

Agree with you on the efficiency statement. But if you look at most of the games, the Irish didn't start on the 20 or 15, most starts of the Red Zone offense started within the 10 yard line. Having 15 or 18 yards to work with rather than 35 or 40 is a little tough with a Red-Shirt freshman at QB and no 'power' full/running back. No excuse but reality. We could all arm-chair coach and say they should-a, could-a, would-a but, you know what....
We is in the BCS and that is all that matters..... !!!!!
GO IRISH!!!!!!!!!
Diz
Not critizing Kelly. He was awesome this year. It is more of question for the future. In the coming years when the offensive talent starts to catch up the defensive talent, what is Kelly going to do. What is going to be the priority. Yes you want be great at both, and ND I believe will be. You rarely ever see a team # 1 in scoring/total offense and # 1 in opponents scoring/total defense. With the pace of the game you innevitably sacrifice statistics in one area for the other.
Brother if anyone knew, they would or wouldn't put the Irish on their schedule. There are too many variables for an answer.....injuries, recruiting, turnovers, game tempo, score,.....girlfriends.....
Who knows??? When 1990 rolled around, ND was predicted to win two more NC's under Holtz.... the talent was definitely there, but unpredictable things happened... like losses...... LOL.
GO IRISH!!!!!!!!!!
Diz
I think all the timeouts and delay penalties show that there's a lot of room for improvement.
I hate when we have to burn a timeout because the play clock. Of everything great BK has done it seems to be area we just have not fixed the issue of having to do that. We have had issues in clock related timeouts and delays since 2010.
That being said noboby is perfect. BK is still the man.