ColoradoIrish
Well-known member
- Messages
- 984
- Reaction score
- 1,425
What do you think? šGot that link handy yet?
What do you think? šGot that link handy yet?
Iām pretty sure Burma is the same guy who accused me of swatting him.What do you think? š
He definitely is. He can only kind of keep hidden until his TDS comes outIām pretty sure Burma is the same guy who accused me of swatting him.
I think I know why he has such a stiffy for daddy Trump.What do you think? š
The surest way to āwinā a discussion like this is to use language like this and treat the person with an opposing view like they are an idiotI listen to the fools here and laugh
you are all ones with TDS
its actually kind of pathetic you swallow the MSM that is hopelessly corrupt and venal
I ask you this though
trump has been around a long time; so why is it only in THAT ONE INSTANCE did he say things like that about the military?
He has only been in politics for a little over 10 years and there was no reason he would have worried about saying that before'
BUT to you who NEEDS to believe it think on this: the ONLY person who said he said this is someone who said it after admitting he despised trump?
That conviction will be overturned; and anyone with a brain saw that judge was determined to take trump down and a DA that campaigned that she was going to convict trump with a jury that was clearly anti trump
AND ask yourself this
why is it no one in history was convicted of that crime as a felony? Ask yourself that but you won't. That had been only misdemeanors UNTIL TRUMP. Why is that?
ask yourself why the same system let Hilary off with a security breach in her emails that anyone else would have done hard time.
I mean this is a system that found OJ Simpson innocent after all...
For some on this site it seems to be mission impossibleWhatās so difficult about not discussing politics in the football threads?
The surest way to āwinā a discussion like this is to use language like this and treat the person with an opposing view like they are an idiot
So that's why my mother in law is a delusional muttering addled racist.Very Trumpian. Almost to a T. The average American that approves his presidency tends to sound like him.
I fed into this comment by saying our president violated the constitution. I should have never said that...I started all this with my comments about Trump's EO for the Army/Navy game being a charade. I shouldn't have gone there. Sorry for derailing this thread.
Soccer is beyond crazy where technical skills matter so much more. I mean a 6'5 striker like Haaland is great but I'm fine with a more well rounded and technical 5'10 Mbappe. I always said that measurables get you in the door (looks) but technique (skills) is what keeps you there.Same crap in soccer too...my boys were late bloomers and were more technical than most kids...but coaches were looking for the physical tools...
I told my wife the same thingSoccer is beyond crazy where technical skills matter so much more. I mean a 6'5 striker like Haaland is great but I'm fine with a more well rounded and technical 5'10 Mbappe. I always said that measurables get you in the door (looks) but technique (skills) is what keeps you there.
AbsolutelyI told my wife the same thing
Hear what youāre saying , but Haaland is the exception. His technical skills are insanely good in relation to nearly all other ātallā 9s ā¦. But give me Baggio over all of them šSoccer is beyond crazy where technical skills matter so much more. I mean a 6'5 striker like Haaland is great but I'm fine with a more well rounded and technical 5'10 Mbappe. I always said that measurables get you in the door (looks) but technique (skills) is what keeps you there.
I wouldn't consider him to be very technically skilled he relies a ton on his midfield and wingers for build up play, below average dribbler who struggles in 1v1 situations and he's a weak passer. He's good at shielding defenders and has elite power and very good speed and ability to win duels but those aren't really technical skills. I think technical would be peak Ronaldo (Both) and Kane who had the best of both worlds.Hear what youāre saying , but Haaland is the exception. His technical skills are insanely good in relation to nearly all other ātallā 9s ā¦. But give me Baggio over all of them š
Baggio for sure a different type of player than Haaland and even Mbappe in most respects. Many times in his career (especially when he was younger) he would dominate the wing, much like Mbappe, IMO better than Kylian. I do agree with you in that I would prefer an Mbappe , Vini JR type player, over a Haaland. But damn, having that TRUE DOMINANT 9 can change the game and team. Pio Esposito is starting to show that now for Italy. Just wish it was a few months earlierI wouldn't consider him to be very technically skilled he relies a ton on his midfield and wingers for build up play, below average dribbler who struggles in 1v1 situations and he's a weak passer. He's good at shielding defenders and has elite power and very good speed and ability to win duels but those aren't really technical skills. I think technical would be peak Ronaldo (Both) and Kane who had the best of both worlds.
Baggio! Classic name there but he wasn't a true striker he played it secondary and was a true "10". He was a machine no doubt! Nice
Prolific goal scorer but not much versatility! If he isn't scoring goals not much to offer so to speak. Peak Lewandowski, Kane, Ronaldo (Los dos), Ibrahimovic Benzema and Mbappe all brought much more versatility to the Striker position. Granted some started out as wingers and transitioned but that's all apart of their versatility.Even when Haaland isnt playing that well, he produces at a ridiculous rate. Can't imagine wanting anyone else at center forward.
He's going to be a dual sport athlete....kids one helluva goalkeeperš¤£š¤£When did Monds start playing soccer?