NDMontana
All-American Reject
- Messages
- 1,669
- Reaction score
- 101
Well, at least for the first time tonight, I agree with you.
Than I must have misspoken.
Well, at least for the first time tonight, I agree with you.
So far, they have run well enough to win.
Winning is always priority #1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
The boys are, indeed, getting it done. If we go into Thanksgiving at 11-1 I will shit my pants....that would mean that we beat pUSC.
When you shit your pants up where you live, does it just freeze? And then is it at all similar to when you touch your tongue to a frozen flag pole? I wouldn't want to pour warm water down my ass crack to remove my underwear from my crevasse!
Sorry for being crass, I am a little intoxicated.
We do not deserve a BCS birth.
Two thoughts:
1. All the talk about us (or any team, for that matter) going to a BCS bowl at this point in the season is laughable. Here's a visual aid.
2. How about we let them play the games before we decide what we don't (or do) deserve for a bowl?
Camper is a smart ass man. As much as i love ND football i want them to go 9-3 at best. We do not deserve a BCS birth.
is huge... big statement game for us there.
Should be a great game too, two youngest teams in the country that actually have a shot at becoming something down the road... should be a great game
odd fact is a close loss may be the best outcome long term for ND, the last thing they want is to run through nine plus wins, go to the BCS and get SMOKED again....
why do you guys think that if we go 10-2 we will be in the BCS. you have to finish top 12, and a 2 loss ND team this year just wont do it.
10-2 would do it, however our last game of the year is at USC, and since we will be 10-1 going in to the game, a loss would drop us out of BCS contention. Incoming Gator bowl invite.
For those of you who haven't watched North Carolina yet, they are very good. I'm surprised they're not ranked.
Can somebody explain to me what it means when someone says "the team needs to play for 4 quarters", because every game I've watched this season, the team plays 4 quarters. In fact, if they don't play the full 4 quarters, I think they take a loss by forfeit.
Notre Dame never runs up the score, they got into a conservative offense to run out the clock, it was a mistake in the gameplan, one I'm sure Weis has learned from.
This team has been good since the 2nd half of the MSU game. If they are ELITE for 1 quarter, good for another, and shitty the other two, I can care less, so long as they have more points than the other team by games end.
In other words, luck plays a huge factor when breaking a teams performance down by quarter.
It wouldn't be luck if the result is a product of skill and preparation. I dont care how much team prepares for a game, or how skilled they're. Sometimes a ball can tip off a helmet or slip through a players hand (that same player will catch the ball the other 99% of the time) and land into a defenders hand who has an easy/wide open angle to the endzone. This single play can change the entire outlook of a quarter.
Now, did the team who got the lucky touchdown play better than the other team? Or was the outcome merely a product of luck?
So if the WR would've concentrated/prepared more, he would've been able to use jedi mind tricks to prevent the deflected pass from landing right into the defenders hands, with a wide open angle to the endzone?
No offense, '97, but ND still only averaged 3.1 yards per carry today. They're not going "to be back", or anywhere near it, until they find a way to run the ball consistently, and well.