Media Matters

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,106
Reaction score
5,458
The guy I quoted isn't an atheist and neither am I. But nice try
A “Christian” man writes an article that is published by a page founded and funded by atheists. I’m not calling you atheist. I’m saying your argument is trash if it’s claiming to be a Christian article published by atheists.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
A “Christian” man writes an article that is published by a page founded and funded by atheists. I’m not calling you atheist. I’m saying your argument is trash if it’s claiming to be a Christian article published by atheists.
That doesn't change the fact that the author is a Christian
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920

This is of course..idiotic.

The uncut interview and transcripts have been available for months.

How is an answer lasting three minutes bad?

It's the substance of the answer that makes the answer good or bad. What answer was it? What in the substance made it correct or incorrect? Good or bad?

Always hilarious to see MAGA contradict themselves though.

Harris was simultaneously refusing to do interviews...but when she did them she was talking for too long!

Please for the love of Christ pick one.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
6,159
That some of the media is now trying to portray this as "We missed it" instead of the truth - "We actively covered it up to mislead the voters" - is just another example of their blatant dishonesty. They aren't trying to accurately and honestly inform the American people. They haven't in decades.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,380
Reaction score
5,807
Should surprise nobody. SMH


If deceptive editing had an award, the person who was tasked with trying to make her look competent should be awarded. CBS should also be awarded, a fine, for such activity. It’s a campaign donation and manipulative election activity.
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920

For context: Video of the story..which this Tweet doesn't provide...(wonder why?)

Here is the exchange that the tweet is referring to:

Isobel Yeung: I mean, according to the Trump administration, you are a terrorist. The cartels have been labeled a foreign terrorist organization. What do you make of that?

Cartel member: Well, the situation is ugly. But we have to eat.

Yeung: What's your message to Donald Trump if he's watching this?

CM: My respect. According to him, he's looking out for his people. But the problem is the consumers are in the United States. If there weren't any consumers, we would stop.

Nothing about this exchange was "sympathetic" or even "anti-Trump"

I find it ironic in a thread/tweet bitching about dishonest media coverage that you went and posted completely dishonest shit.

I'm willing to bet you didn't watch the CNN interview at all and just swallowed what this tweet gave you without any question.
 
Last edited:

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,353
Reaction score
5,707
I really hope we can get to the bottom of why "the media" is not spending enough time on Trump's incredible successes! I just know green screen lady is being fair and balanced!!!!
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
I really hope we can get to the bottom of why "the media" is not spending enough time on Trump's incredible successes! I just know green screen lady is being fair and balanced!!!!
I can think of no better impartial source than *checks notes* Dr. Phil's uncited podcast and statistics.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
6,159
I really hope we can get to the bottom of why "the media" is not spending enough time on Trump's incredible successes! I just know green screen lady is being fair and balanced!!!!
Straw-Man-620x350.jpg
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,382
I really hope we can get to the bottom of why "the media" is not spending enough time on Trump's incredible successes! I just know green screen lady is being fair and balanced!!!!
More fair and balanced than 93-97% negative press. That's just absurd.

Based on those numbers, someone might think the US is living in a dystopian hellscape if one had an outsider's perspective from somewhere else, say, Canada.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,353
Reaction score
5,707
More fair and balanced than 93-97% negative press. That's just absurd.

Based on those numbers, someone might think the US is living in a dystopian hellscape if one had an outsider's perspective from somewhere else, say, Canada.
I know how much IE MAGA loves to say anything with a left wing bias on a bias website can't be trusted, but I'll entertain Jason Stands for Truth! These figures are based on? I don't know about you, but I don't typically trust people who deceptively stand in front of a green screen of another media entity.

My consumption of media is not relegated to MSM sources, I haven't paid for cable news since 2017. So, maybe, people from other countries consume more types of media rather than relying on cable tv sources.
 
Top