I don't know these guys and this was after the Marshall loss and it does seem a bit harsh.
However, some points are somewhat valid.
1. Marcus advanced very quickly.
2. He played for a defensive minded-HC in Luke Fickell
3. His one year as DC at ND didn't have the defense any more dominant than Clark Lea's
4. He is a great recruiter and loved by many (I really want him to succeed, too).
What I question is whether Freeman can be decisive. Will he insert himself into the offensive side of the ball (much less the Defensive Side of the ball). Or does Swarbrick only have the reigns on Tommy Rees.
1. Fair point.
2. I assume you mean coached under. So did Kirby Smart. So did Lincoln Riley. So did Brent Venables.
3. I think this had more to do with the fact that there was a drop off in top tier playmakers on defense in '21. They lost JOK and had guys like Daelin Hayes, Ade Ogundeji and MTA added to guys like Foskey, Ademilola and Hinish. Then they lost Marist, who was supposed to be the havoc creator. Didn't help that LB depth was lacking because of poor recruiting.
4. What I'm concerned about is that NIL might mitigate that advantage.
I think Freeman has already inserted himself into the offense. It seems like Freeman is pretty clear that the offense is playing to his overall design, which is to be conservative and run-oriented. I think Marcus trusts Tommy to run the offense to meet this goal, but I doubt he's just making him the de-facto head coach of the offense.