Marcus Freeman named Dick Corbett Head Football Coach

Dizzyphil

Well-known member
Messages
4,094
Reaction score
1,541
Beat me to it... I agree. Not only do the players have to 'Gel'... So do the coaches. I see this as a good coaching squad.

Entire Staff:

Marcus Freeman - Head coach
Tommy Rees - OC/QBs
Harry Hiestand - OL
Chansi Stuckey - WRs
Deland McCullough - RBs
Gerad Parker - TEs
Al Golden - DC/LBs
Al Washington - DL
Mike Mickens - CBs
Chris O’Leary - DBs/Safeties
Brian Mason - STC
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
RB's - McCollough - A+
TE's - Parker - C
WR's - Stuckey - C+
OL - Heistand - A++
DL - Washington - B
DC - Golden - B
ST - Mason - A+

I'll consider that a B+ overall, which is great for a first-time HC.

I'm meh on Parker, since it seemed like a strange hire that was made quickly, and we got teased with some big names that were interested. That influences my grade, even if those guys were unrealistic or not great options for other reasons.

I'm cautiously optimistic on Stuckey. I would have gone with a flat 'C,' but he's got recruiting experience in Texas.

The great news is that the two guys viewed as head-scratchers/toss-ups are guys that can easily prove their worth, and Golden could turn into an A+ hire if he rediscovers some recruiting connections in the South. Parker just has to keep the TE room stocked, and Stuckey has to elevate recruiting from where Alexander had it... both of which are reasonable benchmarks to attain if Freeman has gambled correctly.

Maybe I wouldn't be so Meh on the hire if we it didnt feel so different than the rest of them. Seemed like we carefully weighed our options on all the other jobs, then this one was like done no other names/interviews. Had we actually interviewed some of the other names then landed here I would feel better. I dont know if that changes the grade any though.
I must be higher on the Parker hire than most. He seems like he was a rising star in the coaching ranks but flamed out a bit with his first OC gig. I think he was pretty highly thought of prior to that job title and has been noted as a big energy guy.

I definitely get that he wasn't on the list of dream names for everyone, but I don't think Golden was either but as you learn more about what they have done recently, you like the hire more.
Not only flamed out after first OC gig was currently getting somewhat demoted in his second (went from OC to co-OC).

I think as others mentioned it is going to be how this staff finds their roles and rhythms as it's a large amount of staff turnover and new/increased roles for Tommy/MF.
 

BeauBenken

Shut up, Richard
Staff member
Messages
16,041
Reaction score
5,491
Maybe I wouldn't be so Meh on the hire if we it didnt feel so different than the rest of them. Seemed like we carefully weighed our options on all the other jobs, then this one was like done no other names/interviews. Had we actually interviewed some of the other names then landed here I would feel better. I dont know if that changes the grade any though.

Not only flamed out after first OC gig was currently getting somewhat demoted in his second (went from OC to co-OC).

I think as others mentioned it is going to be how this staff finds their roles and rhythms as it's a large amount of staff turnover and new/increased roles for Tommy/MF.

To my knowledge he has only been OC at West Virginia, and yes, he was getting push aside because they hired Graham Harrell.
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
To my knowledge he has only been OC at West Virginia, and yes, he was getting push aside because they hired Graham Harrell.
I thought he had a whole 24 hours at East Carolina until he celebrated too hard and they said no thanks.
 

BeauBenken

Shut up, Richard
Staff member
Messages
16,041
Reaction score
5,491
I thought he had a whole 24 hours at East Carolina until he celebrated too hard and they said no thanks.

Touche. Forgot about the DUI thing, but that isn't a shot at his coaching ability.
 

irishff1014

Well-known member
Messages
26,514
Reaction score
9,289
Golden= B+
McCollough= A
Heistand= A
Stuckey= B-
Parker= C-
Washington= B
Mason= B+

Golden brings a lot of experience with him. He has head coaching experience that Freeman can tap into. His linebackers at the NFL level seemed to be good and prepared.

McCollough i don't know much about however if the giants were coming after him hard and willing to pay him big bucks that says something. Lance left him a great situation lets hope he can continue to build it.

Heistand was needed back. The offensive line need to have some more toughness brought back. He may be hard nose but the man can produce.

Stuckey has a background to have ties and coaching schemes that can help him be successful here. He is gonna have his hands full. Recruiting WR at ND is black hole for some reason. If he can recruit and get some solid WR's his grade will go up. Imo he is a wait and see.

Parker is still the most confusing hire. And really to me this sounds like a Backup plan if Rees were to leave nest year. And he is friends with Freeman. I understand coaches coach multiple positions through their careers but this man hasn't coached TE's in some time. Hiestand can coach them blocking and Stuckey can coach them from the receiving side. With the production of QB's we would have been way better off with a QB coach.

Washington is a household name and has relationships everywhere. Good to see he is back at his natural position. Again he has some talent to work with. I think he will be able to recruit better than Elston but will he get the same production out of them. If he can our strength just got better.

Mason i know next to nothing about. However if the special teams comes out with a pulse we are improving. The last few years Polian was living off the past. Everything i have read about him has been good so let's hope a bigger stage doesn't affect that.

I do believe that some of the changes were good but i do think that the amount of staff turnover and the inexperience of Freeman hurts us next season overall. I would not expect a double digit win total.
 

irishff1014

Well-known member
Messages
26,514
Reaction score
9,289
Hearing stories about how bad the communication was with recruits and recruiting the year or so I didn’t like his answer about the recruiting coordinator.
 

irishff1014

Well-known member
Messages
26,514
Reaction score
9,289
I really liked Brian Mason’s answers. Especially the what did ND and Cincy have in common. He said No very quickly lol. He is a passionate dude.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
Hearing stories about how bad the communication was with recruits and recruiting the year or so I didn’t like his answer about the recruiting coordinator.
This is the last thing you should worry about with Freeman. He is the recruiting coordinator. It is like #1 #2 and #3 on his priorities list.

By the way, he blew the door off this press conference today, as did Mason and Golden.
 

Dizzyphil

Well-known member
Messages
4,094
Reaction score
1,541
This is the last thing you should worry about with Freeman. He is the recruiting coordinator. It is like #1 #2 and #3 on his priorities list.

By the way, he blew the door off this press conference today, as did Mason and Golden.
This is why I wanted to hear more questions about recruiting from Golden and Mason. Don't get me wrong - I know MF is going to make it happen and I believe he will bring talent. But he can't do it alone.
 

irishff1014

Well-known member
Messages
26,514
Reaction score
9,289
This is the last thing you should worry about with Freeman. He is the recruiting coordinator. It is like #1 #2 and #3 on his priorities list.

By the way, he blew the door off this press conference today, as did Mason and Golden.

Freeman as a first time head coach is going to be doing a lot. He needs someone to say hey set these trips up while I attend this meeting. I understand he is about recruiting but he stills needs someone to manage it.

Everyone was good I thought. Good to see that Tommy really did want to be here. I can’t wait to see the video’s of the other coaches.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,120
Reaction score
27,376
I think the recruiting coordinator is really just an antiquated title for todays staff. Bowden does everything Elston and Polian used to do and 100x more. If someone needs a fancy title promotion in the future maybe we have one but I think it’s really not necessary
 

chisea03

Active member
Messages
368
Reaction score
157
Golden= B+
McCollough= A
Heistand= A
Stuckey= B-
Parker= C-
Washington= B
Mason= B+

Golden brings a lot of experience with him. He has head coaching experience that Freeman can tap into. His linebackers at the NFL level seemed to be good and prepared.

McCollough i don't know much about however if the giants were coming after him hard and willing to pay him big bucks that says something. Lance left him a great situation lets hope he can continue to build it.

Heistand was needed back. The offensive line need to have some more toughness brought back. He may be hard nose but the man can produce.

Stuckey has a background to have ties and coaching schemes that can help him be successful here. He is gonna have his hands full. Recruiting WR at ND is black hole for some reason. If he can recruit and get some solid WR's his grade will go up. Imo he is a wait and see.

Parker is still the most confusing hire. And really to me this sounds like a Backup plan if Rees were to leave nest year. And he is friends with Freeman. I understand coaches coach multiple positions through their careers but this man hasn't coached TE's in some time. Hiestand can coach them blocking and Stuckey can coach them from the receiving side. With the production of QB's we would have been way better off with a QB coach.

Washington is a household name and has relationships everywhere. Good to see he is back at his natural position. Again he has some talent to work with. I think he will be able to recruit better than Elston but will he get the same production out of them. If he can our strength just got better.

Mason i know next to nothing about. However if the special teams comes out with a pulse we are improving. The last few years Polian was living off the past. Everything i have read about him has been good so let's hope a bigger stage doesn't affect that.

I do believe that some of the changes were good but i do think that the amount of staff turnover and the inexperience of Freeman hurts us next season overall. I would not expect a double
 
Last edited:

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
I like hearing stories about our mediocre recruiting under Kelly. Means there is actual progress to be made.
Yeah for awhile I was starting to feel like ND was at its recruiting ceiling. Then I realized that was just what Kelly wanted you to believe.

Freeman is going to put together back to back top 5 classes in 23-24 barring a dumpster fire season in the fall.
 

Valpodoc85

Well-known member
Messages
1,719
Reaction score
466
I would love to know what other coaches think of MFMF and his coaching choices. Are they happy Burnt Ends is at LSU. Do they feel challenged on the recruiting trail. Is Ryan Day concerned about the opener or relieved.
 

greyhammer90

the drunk piano player
Messages
16,840
Reaction score
16,123
I would love to know what other coaches think of MFMF and his coaching choices. Are they happy Burnt Ends is at LSU. Do they feel challenged on the recruiting trail. Is Ryan Day concerned about the opener or relieved.

Relieved is a strong word, but I have to think you'd rather play a head coach with an 0-1 record than the winningest coach in school history. The expectation shouldn't be that Freeman is going to be a better game day coach than BK in year one, so for OSU you'd think they feel better about their odds. The whole appeal of Freeman is that he's got a chance to recruit us into another tier over the next 3 years, at which time he'll be experienced and we'll have a title window.

Feels like we're basically betting that he's the next Urban Meyer circa 2004 young phenom coach and we're getting in on the ground level.
 

GoldenAura

Well-known member
Messages
1,215
Reaction score
2,578
Relieved is a strong word, but I have to think you'd rather play a head coach with an 0-1 record than the winningest coach in school history. The expectation shouldn't be that Freeman is going to be a better game day coach than BK in year one, so for OSU you'd think they feel better about their odds. The whole appeal of Freeman is that he's got a chance to recruit us into another tier over the next 3 years, at which time he'll be experienced and we'll have a title window.

Feels like we're basically betting that he's the next Urban Meyer circa 2004 young phenom coach and we're getting in on the ground level.
Wishful thinking on my part but I hope he's our Kirby Smart. Smart's first year was an 8-5 finish but with the high level recruiting he did, it really took off after that.
 

greyhammer90

the drunk piano player
Messages
16,840
Reaction score
16,123
The biggest thing I'm nervous about with Freeman is that over the last few years we've had a huge amount of what's been called "culture wins." We won nearly 100% of the games that we always seemed to lose under Weis and Willingham where the team has bad luck, gets unexpectedly punched in the mouth, or is put in a "do or die" situation. There's been a strong attempt recently by ND media to attribute nearly all of that "can't lose" culture to Ballis and not to BK, but I'm not convinced. I don't think it's coincidental that the team experienced a strong momentum swing and couldn't recover in our very first game without BK steering the ship.

Also we had quite a few moments last year where our situational defense was doodoo. I'm hopeful Golden is going to have a positive impact on that. Giving up quick scoring drives just before halftime is a killer and it happened so many times last year.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
The biggest thing I'm nervous about with Freeman is that over the last few years we've had a huge amount of what's been called "culture wins." We won nearly 100% of the games that we always seemed to lose under Weis and Willingham where the team has bad luck, gets unexpectedly punched in the mouth, or is put in a "do or die" situation. There's been a strong attempt recently by ND media to attribute nearly all of that "can't lose" culture to Ballis and not to BK, but I'm not convinced. I don't think it's coincidental that the team experienced a strong momentum swing and couldn't recover in our very first game without BK steering the ship.

Also we had quite a few moments last year where our situational defense was doodoo. I'm hopeful Golden is going to have a positive impact on that. Giving up quick scoring drives just before halftime is a killer and it happened so many times last year.
We will see. But it’s hard to believe Kelly had much to do with that toughness. I feel like accountability/toughness is more of a position coach and S&C thing. Also before Balis, his teams were decidedly not tough.

Kelly preaches all business, no emotion and gave the blandest speeches I’ve ever heard from a coach.

He was also not a presence to his players. They needed to schedule meetings through their captain and/or position coach to even sit with Kelly. He was a really good CEO but a motivator he was/is not.
 

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,770
Reaction score
10,153
We will see. But it’s hard to believe Kelly had much to do with that toughness. I feel like accountability/toughness is more of a position coach and S&C thing. Also before Balis, his teams were decidedly not tough.

Kelly preaches all business, no emotion and gave the blandest speeches I’ve ever heard from a coach.

He was also not a presence to his players. They needed to schedule meetings through their captain and/or position coach to even sit with Kelly. He was a really good CEO but a motivator he was/is not.
Look, I get it. Kelly left in a douche bag fashion and now he’s enemy #1. I’m all aboard the #FBK express. But, let’s give the revisionist history stuff a rest. Kelly should get a majority of the credit for the previous culture of the team. It was his team. He hired and put these guys in place. He’s literally the winningest coach in ND history. BK gets the credit for improving the culture and program after Weis. He gets the blame for letting it go in 2016. And he gets credit for the huge change thereafter. Heck he was very instrumental in getting Freeman to ND, lol.

It’s either that or we don’t need to give Freeman credit for the culture he cultivates as HC. I’ll go with the former and be fired up for Freeman if he can do the same.

Can you have the belief that Freeman will have a better culture? Absolutely. But, like Grey mentioned, the first time his team got punched in the mouth, by an inferior opponent no less, they wilted. It’s valid criticism and one I’ve thought about since that game. So, I’m glad we got the coolness and hype back at ND but culture is more than pre-game speeches and sweet media videos.
 

Irishize

Well-known member
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
461
The biggest thing I'm nervous about with Freeman is that over the last few years we've had a huge amount of what's been called "culture wins." We won nearly 100% of the games that we always seemed to lose under Weis and Willingham where the team has bad luck, gets unexpectedly punched in the mouth, or is put in a "do or die" situation. There's been a strong attempt recently by ND media to attribute nearly all of that "can't lose" culture to Ballis and not to BK, but I'm not convinced. I don't think it's coincidental that the team experienced a strong momentum swing and couldn't recover in our very first game without BK steering the ship.

Also we had quite a few moments last year where our situational defense was doodoo. I'm hopeful Golden is going to have a positive impact on that. Giving up quick scoring drives just before halftime is a killer and it happened so many times last year.
That’s fair. It’s also fair to say this year’s team could very well be better than 2021 but w/ a worse record b/c of the schedule. ND lucked out last year with every team other than Cincy being worse than expected going into the season. Even Cincy wasn’t better than we expected.

Now Freeman has new coaches at DC, WR, TE, ST, RB and new staff behind the scenes. He’s got time to get Golden singing from the same hymnal so there shouldn’t be many “growing pains” there as Golden has been around the block. Looking at game one in C’bus, it’s hard to expect the staff to work miracles w/ basically the same defensive lineup that blew the bowl game. I’m already dreading the post-game thread for tOSU b/c it could get ugly b/c they have a high octane offense that on paper eats ND’s secondary alive. One or even two games are not a trend.
 

Crazy Balki

Site Assigned Optimist
Messages
7,868
Reaction score
4,477
The biggest thing I'm nervous about with Freeman is that over the last few years we've had a huge amount of what's been called "culture wins." We won nearly 100% of the games that we always seemed to lose under Weis and Willingham where the team has bad luck, gets unexpectedly punched in the mouth, or is put in a "do or die" situation. There's been a strong attempt recently by ND media to attribute nearly all of that "can't lose" culture to Ballis and not to BK, but I'm not convinced. I don't think it's coincidental that the team experienced a strong momentum swing and couldn't recover in our very first game without BK steering the ship.

Also we had quite a few moments last year where our situational defense was doodoo. I'm hopeful Golden is going to have a positive impact on that. Giving up quick scoring drives just before halftime is a killer and it happened so many times last year.
I think your memory is failing you a bit here.

Prior to Balis arriving, ND had A LOT of bad, almost inexplicable losses under Kelly.

2010: (3 bad losses) Losing in the final seconds to Rich Rod's Michigan, getting blown out by Navy, losing to Tulsa.
2011: (3 bad losses) South Florida, losing in the final seconds to Michigan again, the debacle against USC after a BYE.
2013: (2 bad losses) Getting pushed around by a mediocre Michigan team, losing to a mediocre Pitt squad
2014: (4 bad losses) Turnover-palooza in Tempe, losing to an awful NW team at home, Louisville and the abomination that was the SC game.
2016: (SEVEN bad losses) I can't get into all of them, but the fact that ND went 4-8, when their schedule was pretty damn easy is an indictment of how poor the program was at that point. 3 of their losses came to teams that finished the year with losing records.

In the first 7 seasons of Kelly's tenure, there was really only 2 seasons where there wasn't that WTF loss, and a lot of that had to do with simply have more talent and the quality leadership of those units.

Suddenly, 2017 rolls around and Balis is hired. Suddenly, this team looks physically and mentally tougher and is winning the games they should win. There was still the occasional head-scratching no-show to a solid program like Miami or Michigan. But there wasn't that inexplicable loss to garbage teams like South Florida, Duke or Northwestern.

This wasn't simply a thing that Kelly fixed himself. He had to revamp the S&C program that had deteriorated under Longo. Balis came in and almost immediately improved everything by leaps and bounds. Since 2017, the team appears to be in better shape physically and they always seem to have quality leadership, year to year. Meanwhile from '10 to '16, the only years where that was the case was '12 and '15.
 

Crazy Balki

Site Assigned Optimist
Messages
7,868
Reaction score
4,477
Look, I get it. Kelly left in a douche bag fashion and now he’s enemy #1. I’m all aboard the #FBK express. But, let’s give the revisionist history stuff a rest. Kelly should get a majority of the credit for the previous culture of the team. It was his team. He hired and put these guys in place. He’s literally the winningest coach in ND history. BK gets the credit for improving the culture and program after Weis. He gets the blame for letting it go in 2016. And he gets credit for the huge change thereafter. Heck he was very instrumental in getting Freeman to ND, lol.

It’s either that or we don’t need to give Freeman credit for the culture he cultivates as HC. I’ll go with the former and be fired up for Freeman if he can do the same.

Can you have the belief that Freeman will have a better culture? Absolutely. But, like Grey mentioned, the first time his team got punched in the mouth, by an inferior opponent no less, they wilted. It’s valid criticism and one I’ve thought about since that game. So, I’m glad we got the coolness and hype back at ND but culture is more than pre-game speeches and sweet media videos.
I don't think that's revisionist history in the slightest.

Kelly gets credit for putting the right people in place to instill the culture that has allowed ND to win the games it should win.

A lot of those people he put in place are still here, primarily Matt Balis.

Again, it's no shocker that Balis arrives in 2017 and suddenly, the inexplicable bad losses to teams they should beat immediately vanish. The teams since 2017 have been noticeably tougher, both physically and mentally, and the leadership has been consistently solid.

To say that Matt Balis and S&C overall play a big role in shaping that toughness and leadership would be the understatement of the century.

Balis is the coach that these players are working with the most and are around the most. He's the coach tasked with getting these guys to push themselves and each other to their breaking points and create these insane circumstances, so leaders will emerge and push the rest of the team past the finish line.
 

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,770
Reaction score
10,153
I don't think that's revisionist history in the slightest.

Kelly gets credit for putting the right people in place to instill the culture that has allowed ND to win the games it should win.

A lot of those people he put in place are still here, primarily Matt Balis.

Again, it's no shocker that Balis arrives in 2017 and suddenly, the inexplicable bad losses to teams they should beat immediately vanish. The teams since 2017 have been noticeably tougher, both physically and mentally, and the leadership has been consistently solid.

To say that Matt Balis and S&C overall play a big role in shaping that toughness and leadership would be the understatement of the century.

Balis is the coach that these players are working with the most and are around the most. He's the coach tasked with getting these guys to push themselves and each other to their breaking points and create these insane circumstances, so leaders will emerge and push the rest of the team past the finish line.
It’s a 100% what that is.

All last season, folks like ISD, trumpeted these culture wins that BK should get credit for. And defended that while some of it might not look or feel how everyone wanted they were still wins. And they were significant in signs of program stability.

Now he leaves and we act like those should go to the handful of guys still here. That’s pretty much the definition of what revisionist history is.

If BK was still the coach we’d still be loving the culture hence the use of the term.
 

Crazy Balki

Site Assigned Optimist
Messages
7,868
Reaction score
4,477
It’s a 100% what that is.

All last season, folks like ISD, trumpeted these culture wins that BK should get credit for. And defended that while some of it might not look or feel how everyone wanted they were still wins. And they were significant in signs of program stability.

Now he leaves and we act like those should go to the handful of guys still here. That’s pretty much the definition of what revisionist history is.

If BK was still the coach we’d still be loving the culture hence the use of the term.
Sorry, but no it isn't.

Again, your argument would hold up a lot better if Kelly was getting all these culture wins prior to Balis.

As we know, that simply wasn't the case. Kelly lost quite a few games that his team had zero business losing from 2010-16.

That number has pretty much shrunk to nothing since 2017, and it just so happens that's when Balis was hired to completely revamp the S&C program.

I think you severely underestimate how much of an impact Balis has on the program. Of all the necessary hires that Kelly had to make to complete the reboot and establishing that culture, Balis was, BY FAR, the most important and impactful.

Like I said, he is the guy that the team is around the most and he's the guy tasked with forming the mental and physical makeup of the team during the offseason. January through July, Matt Balis is with the team, day in and day out. A team isn't developed in spring or fall camp. They're developed through the dog days of winter and summer workouts, when Balis is putting them through the ringer for hours and hours every week. That's where leaders emerge and players develop the physical and mental toughness needed to maintain that consistency and win the games you should win.

Getting ND's S&C program right was far and away the most important element of the turnaround and him staying on when they moved from Kelly to Freeman was easily the biggest retention. Kelly should get credit for putting the right people in place to establish that culture, but like I said, a lot of them are still here, and the most important guy involved in establishing that culture is Matt Balis, and he's still here.
 

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,770
Reaction score
10,153
Haha, ok that is really stupid logic as Kelly literally employed all these people. He went out and got them on his team. Hence the credit. But, I’m not going down this rabbit hole.

I’ll just put this away and remember it for the next time you jump Freeman’s jock for his culture.

#BalisEra.
 

Crazy Balki

Site Assigned Optimist
Messages
7,868
Reaction score
4,477
Haha, ok that is really stupid logic as Kelly literally employed all these people. He went out and got them on his team. Hence the credit. But, I’m not going down this rabbit hole.

I’ll just put this away and remember it for the next time you jump Freeman’s jock for his culture.
What are you talking about?

I literally gave Kelly credit for hiring these guys. But my point is that the culture is maintained, because the man responsible for establishing that culture is still here. That's Matt Balis. He is at the center of the reboot and establishing the culture we've enjoyed the past 5 seasons.

Freeman literally said that his job isn't to change the culture, but to enhance it. He wants to build off what Kelly helped build, and he has the most important piece in place to do that in Balis.

You basically said that fans claiming that it's revisionist history that Kelly is responsible for bringing the culture to ND. He brought the people in to establish that culture that wasn't there before. He had been at ND for 7 seasons prior to that and the culture wasn't where it needed to be. Then he brought in a bunch of new coaches, and in particular, Balis. And suddenly the culture is built. Kelly gets credit for bringing Balis, but Balis is the guy who laid the actual ground work to establishing that culture.
 
Top