I was just looking at something today in my thumb-twiddling, toe-tapping gameday impatience and it kinda caught my eye. Everybody talks about how dominant LSU is statistically, but are they really?
Total point differential vs. all opponents: 397-150
Eye-popping, yes; but wait:
vs. opponents without winning records (La-Laf, Tulane, Fresno St, etc.): 276-70
vs. opponents with winning records: 121-80 (with two losses in those five games)
I haven't really taken the time to investigate it, but I would assume this trend translates to the majority of the statistical categories. LSU plays a poor team and wins 40-something to 3/7 (But they did have a squeaker against Miss.) LSU plays a team that can actually beat other teams, and it's a close game, with LSU losing 2 out of the 5.
It's funny how so many in the media are quick to say that ND/BQ padded stats against the "service academies," but give LSU a pass on the doormats of the SEC, Fresno St, Tulane, and a Div-IAA team.
Also of note: The LSU offense that is so prolific and uber-talented and uber-fast and unstoppable put up 3......THREE!!!!!! points on Auburn and 10 on UF. Come on. Even when our defense played like crap our offense was able to put the ball in the endzone no matter who we were playing.
And LSU, not ND, is the team with the unstoppable offense? Tell that to AU, FL, USC, and UM. (And PSU while you're at it since they beat one of LSU's two "quality" wins, while we put up 41 on PSU.)
This game isn't gonna be the cakewalk that LSU and the media are expecting.
GO IRISH!!!!!!
[Edit:] The gist of it, I guess, is that LSU isn't necessarily as "lights-out" as so many are making them to be.
Total point differential vs. all opponents: 397-150
Eye-popping, yes; but wait:
vs. opponents without winning records (La-Laf, Tulane, Fresno St, etc.): 276-70
vs. opponents with winning records: 121-80 (with two losses in those five games)
I haven't really taken the time to investigate it, but I would assume this trend translates to the majority of the statistical categories. LSU plays a poor team and wins 40-something to 3/7 (But they did have a squeaker against Miss.) LSU plays a team that can actually beat other teams, and it's a close game, with LSU losing 2 out of the 5.
It's funny how so many in the media are quick to say that ND/BQ padded stats against the "service academies," but give LSU a pass on the doormats of the SEC, Fresno St, Tulane, and a Div-IAA team.
Also of note: The LSU offense that is so prolific and uber-talented and uber-fast and unstoppable put up 3......THREE!!!!!! points on Auburn and 10 on UF. Come on. Even when our defense played like crap our offense was able to put the ball in the endzone no matter who we were playing.
And LSU, not ND, is the team with the unstoppable offense? Tell that to AU, FL, USC, and UM. (And PSU while you're at it since they beat one of LSU's two "quality" wins, while we put up 41 on PSU.)
This game isn't gonna be the cakewalk that LSU and the media are expecting.
GO IRISH!!!!!!
[Edit:] The gist of it, I guess, is that LSU isn't necessarily as "lights-out" as so many are making them to be.
Last edited: