Conference schedules being easier is only relative to what ND feels like scheduling for themselves. There's nothing stopping us from softening our schedule. With the playoffs expanding to 12 teams the emphasis on SoS will be reduced further that it already was.
Yes I would sign up for C because A also carries the possibility of losing and being eliminated anyways. A really needs to be split into:
Win the CCG and get a bye
Win the CCG and don't get a bye
Lose the CCG and play round 1
Lose the CCG and be eliminated
I just don't see the possibility of a bye being worth more than a winnable playoff game. Even with the bye you've played the same amount of games you would have otherwise. First round playoff games will be easier than a conference championship game. And they can be at home. Give me a playoff game in ND stadium vs Tulane over a CCG vs OSU in Indy.
Totally on the same page in bold. A massive assumption I’m making in all of this (I think it’s a fair one) is that ND will continue to schedule in a similar manner if we remain independent. Our leadership can be slow to react to the changing cfb landscape, and even if SoS gets further de-emphasized, it wouldn’t at all surprise me to see us continue to brand ourselves and form the best schedule we possibly can.
In that sense, I’d rather be in the Big 10 West and be dealing with Iowa/Wisconsin/etc on a yearly basis than the schedules we typically form.
I just really feel like, more often than not, it would put us in a position to win ourselves into a BYE than lose ourselves out of the playoffs. If that’s the case, then the extra game is a freebie where at worst, we still have to go 3-0 in the playoffs, and at best, we can save ourselves a game in the playoffs.
So italics just must be where we disagree. Agree to disagree.