Immigration

C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Irish#1 said:
Those planes were well on their way when the judge issued a verbal order.

From NBC.
Click to expand...
Nothing in that quote supports that statement. And my point still stands, this administration has been setting up for this exact situation. They've been casting doubt about what the courts are allowed and it was only a matter of time before they blatantly went against the ruling. Tom Homan's rhetoric is just as problematic
 
BuaConstrictor

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
Irish#1 said:
Those planes were well on their way when the judge issued a verbal order.

From NBC.
Click to expand...
1. It doesn't matter if they were well on their way, on the tarmac, or had just taken off. It's irrelevant.
2.Nothing in your quote supports the "well on their way"
3. What was preventing the planes from landing, turning around, and coming home with the persons in question in order to comply with the judge's order?
 
Irish#1

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
45,868
Reaction score
21,904
ColoradoIrish said:
Nothing in that quote supports that statement. And my point still stands, this administration has been setting up for this exact situation. They've been casting doubt about what the courts are allowed and it was only a matter of time before they blatantly went against the ruling. Tom Homan's rhetoric is just as problematic
Click to expand...
No it doesn't. I just posted to provide more clarity on the Justice departments position.

From an Axios report, it looks like the WH didn't blatantly disregard the ruling, but discussed before deciding to continue on.

After publication, Axios published a report referencing two flights that at about 6:51 p.m “were off the Yucatan Peninsula, according to flight paths posted on X.” “Inside the White House, officials discussed whether to order the planes to turn around. On advice from a team of administration lawyers, the administration pressed ahead,” the Axios report states.
Click to expand...

If anyone thought they would turn around on a verbal order is fooling themselves. There's a reason we document.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Irish#1 said:
No it doesn't. I just posted to provide more clarity on the Justice departments position.

From an Axios report, it looks like the WH didn't blatantly disregard the ruling, but discussed before deciding to continue on.



If anyone thought they would turn around on a verbal order is fooling themselves. There's a reason we document.
Click to expand...

No matter how you frame it they purposely disregarded a court order. Just because they had a discussion about it doesn't some how justify their actions.
 
A

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,703
Reaction score
9,025
Irish#1 said:
No it doesn't. I just posted to provide more clarity on the Justice departments position.

From an Axios report, it looks like the WH didn't blatantly disregard the ruling, but discussed before deciding to continue on.



If anyone thought they would turn around on a verbal order is fooling themselves. There's a reason we document.
Click to expand...
The problem I currently have is in the messaging. On the one hand there was a clear message being sent that we didn't disobey the court order, planes were in the air, it was only a verbal order, etc etc.

At the same time there is a lot of rhetoric being blown about that we don't plan on listening to what this judge says and that he should be impeached.

It would seem that it wouldn't have mattered if the Judge's order was verbal or written.
 
BuaConstrictor

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
ab2cmiller said:
The problem I currently have is in the messaging. On the one hand there was a clear message being sent that we didn't disobey the court order, planes were in the air, it was only a verbal order, etc etc.

At the same time there is a lot of rhetoric being blown about that we don't plan on listening to what this judge says and that he should be impeached.

It would seem that it wouldn't have mattered if the Judge's order was verbal or written.
Click to expand...
Ding ding ding ding.

On top of that "verbal orders" are enforceable....because they are written down in real time by the court clerk....and then filed. That's the entire point of the clerk.

In any case...

www.newsweek.com

Trump administration argues a judge's verbal order is "not enforceable"

A federal judge hauled the Trump administration into court after it defied his order to hold off on deporting more than 200 Venezuelan migrants.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

Trump himself doesn't even believe this and has verbally commuted sentences before.

No competent lawyer actually believes this shit about verbal orders.
 
BuaConstrictor

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
NDVirginia19 said:
Was Joe Biden a fascist for defying the Supreme Court with cancelling student debt?
Click to expand...
This was already covered and proven false!

The Biden plan that was blocked by the SCOTUS was not the plan that was implemented(or was going to be). Biden and his admin came up with a new plan that allowed for a reduction in student debt for some borrows and was much narrower in scope so that it (hopefully)complied with the SCOTUS ruling.
 
Last edited:
Irish#1

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
45,868
Reaction score
21,904
ab2cmiller said:
The problem I currently have is in the messaging. On the one hand there was a clear message being sent that we didn't disobey the court order, planes were in the air, it was only a verbal order, etc etc.

At the same time there is a lot of rhetoric being blown about that we don't plan on listening to what this judge says and that he should be impeached.

It would seem that it wouldn't have mattered if the Judge's order was verbal or written.
Click to expand...
The issue with this particular incident is that it was a verbal order and the judge bypassed typical procedure. Hopefully the hearing today should help clear up the gray areas going forward, but I expect this judge to rule against the Justice department, so this is going to go on up the food chain.
 
BuaConstrictor

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
Irish#1 said:
The issue with this particular incident is that it was a verbal order and the judge bypassed typical procedure
Click to expand...
1. There is no issue with verbal orders.
2. What "typical procedures" did it bypass? You keep regurgitating this stuff from Trump's DOJ but are doing nothing to explain it.
3. The "improper procedure" bit also directly cuts against Trump's own DOJ and the deportations themselves because SCOTUS rulings regarding right to due process under the law of aliens in the US have existed for decades and.......all these SCOTUS rulings post-date the Alien Enemies Act and it's last usage.
 
NDVirginia19

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,907
Reaction score
5,804
Crazy that the guy who cheers on terrorism and calls for the President to be murdered is upset that we're bypassing procedures to kick out violent drug dealers from our country lmfao
 
drayer54

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
9,095
Reaction score
6,462
ColoradoIrish said:
It was a consequence of his actions for January 6th and then taking classified documents. He deserved to be investigated for all of that
Click to expand...
This completely ignores the tactics and methods used as well as the coordination from the White House.
ab2cmiller said:
Click to expand...

Simple questions for the Chief Justice:

1. Can a federal judge hold a hearing publicly exposing an ongoing secret military, intelligence, and law-enforcement operation?

2. Can a federal judge order the President to immediately stop that ongoing operation and turn around planes?

The Judicial Branch needs to evaluate activist judges doing these orders on the government.
 
Bishop2b5

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
9,295
Reaction score
6,544
ColoradoIrish said:
That's because I wasn't here for it then.
Click to expand...
First, you most certainly were here for the last several months of Biden's administration and had nothing to say about Biden ignoring standing immigration law. Second, all the others in here who complain about Trump's approach to the border crisis were also dead silent about Biden ignoring US immigration law.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Bishop2b5 said:
First, you most certainly were here for the last several months of Biden's administration and had nothing to say about Biden ignoring standing immigration law. Second, all the others in here who complain about Trump's approach to the border crisis were also dead silent about Biden ignoring US immigration law.
Click to expand...
I started posting on this side of the sight in July you are correct, and I was mostly silent on this issue. I was however critical of the strain immigrants put on our systems. I might not have had solutions or voiced my concerns as loudly as the rest of you. But I also mostly stuck to topics most important to me.
 
BuaConstrictor

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
ColoradoIrish said:
She went/worked at michigan. Deport her too! 😂
Click to expand...
LOL. They give literally everyone legal advice. They are public defender advocates. Breaking news: Judge's daughter works in the legal field.

By Loomer's "logic," Boasberg could never preside over a case related to anything/any case a public defender would be counsel on.
www.partnersforjustice.org

Partners for Justice

Transforming public defense across the United States.
www.partnersforjustice.org www.partnersforjustice.org
 
GATTACA!

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,768
Reaction score
13,687
BuaConstrictor said:
LOL. They give literally everyone legal advice. They are public defender advocates. Breaking news: Judge's daughter works in the legal field.

By Loomer's "logic," Boasberg could never preside over a case related to anything/any case a public defender would be counsel on.
www.partnersforjustice.org

Partners for Justice

Transforming public defense across the United States.
www.partnersforjustice.org www.partnersforjustice.org
Click to expand...
You think that's bad, I heard her Dad is a judge...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top