H
HereComeTheIrish
Guest
If this was not on campus, this should be a non-factor other than the fact that he'll now be under the microscope by res-life.
In reply to a couple of the above posts:
According to du Lac, the Student Handbook, possession of controlled substances including marijuana and driving while impaired/intoxicated, etc. are viewed as much more serious violations with prescribed disciplinary measures.
Under age consumption of alcohol is a violation of res life policy but without intoxication or other serious aggravating factors there is not a prescribed punishment that I can see. It does not make a distinction between consumption on or off campus.
It would seem that with a first offense and no aggravating factors, discipline from Res Life would be relatively light.
If I were #3, I would be more worried about the rath of BK right now.
I don't see how Res Life, ND, ND football, or Kelly has anything to do with this at all. He was in a different city in a different state. Was not at all school related. Seems to me it's up to the local judge to dole out the fine, then everyone moves on. To think he would lose any playing time or practice time over this is ridiculous. Had nothing to do with a football game or the U of ND.
I would not be surprised if Floyd gets to sit out the '10 season based upon past practices.
I doubt that Floyd will receive that harsh of punishment. I know of plenty of examples of similar situations. In fact, I was cited for underage drinking while at ND. I did have to appear in front of Res Life, but all I got was a slap on the wrist. I don't know if the rules have become much more strict in the 6 years that I have been gone, but I don't think he will miss any of the season.
And what did they say about your underage fighting while drinking?
I would not be surprised if Floyd gets to sit out the '10 season based upon past practices.
Let's bet BGIF, I think this is outlandish....
Wow.
Michael is better. At least he was up front and honest with the cops.
No, and he better not get suspended at all.
Whom are you responding too...?