uhhh boy... Here we go.
Referencing a made up ESPN metric.. So "surprised" coming from a Bama/SEC fan.
uhhh boy... Here we go.
Alabama has 7 wins against teams in the top 40 FPI. That's more than any other team. And they will have to beat Florida to win the SEC CG (given they win the IB). Your argument is ridiculous.
We need baylor to jail sex Ok St this week so even if oklahoma wins out, thar last game doesn't look as good as us beating stanford
Agreed. And the Bama schedule is tough enough that you guys can go 12-1 and finish ahead of 13-0 Clemson. I would guess that the #1 spot (if Bama goes 12-1 and Clemson goes 13-0) will be decided by the Florida/FSU winner for SOS purposes.
Or OSU could steamroll MSU, Michigan, Iowa and be #1.
But, I agree there is really no argument with Bama's schedule. Not as top-heavy as in other years, but pretty much as tough as always.
Most important things to ND making the playoff, in order of importance:
1. Win out.
2. Oklahoma State loses.
3. Navy wins out.
4. USC wins out and plays in PAC12 championship game against Stanford.
If all of that happens, ND is probably in. If any of those 4 miss... things get dicey and ND really might need some help.
I disagree. I think they avoid the rematch if they can help it.I disagree. I think if the final four ends up being Alabama, OSU, ND, and Clemson in some order I don't see how the committee can pass up the opportunity of ND/Clemson OSU/Bama rematches. I guess OSU/Clemson and ND/Bama would also be rematches but the former set is more recent.
If Bama jumped Clemson then they would want ND to jump OSU which i don't see any way of them doing. So IMO the top four probably stays the way it is.
Most important things to ND making the playoff, in order of importance:
1. Win out.
2. Oklahoma State loses.
3. Navy wins out.
4. USC wins out and plays in PAC12 championship game against Stanford.
If all of that happens, ND is probably in. If any of those 4 miss... things get dicey and ND really might need some help.
Don't see both 3 and 4 happening. But I don't think both Stanford and USC need to be in the championship game. One of them just needs to win it.
Most important things to ND making the playoff, in order of importance:
1. Win out.
2. Oklahoma State loses.
3. Navy wins out.
4. USC wins out and plays in PAC12 championship game against Stanford.
If all of that happens, ND is probably in. If any of those 4 miss... things get dicey and ND really might need some help.
Agreed. 11-1 Oklahoma is the scenario that makes me the most nervous.If we get lucky and OU finishes 10-2, OK State finishes 11-1, and Baylor finishes 11-1....do you guys (or anyone else) think that there is any way that ND finishes outside the top 4? Regardless of how Navy/USC/Stanford/Temple finish the year? I think at that point, only a scenario with a 12-1 UNC/Clemson or a 13-0 Iowa and 12-1 Ohio State could give us any issue.
Clemson
B10 Champ (tOSU/MSU/Iowa)
SEC Champ (UF/Bama)
ND/OK St
That's how it's going to play out. If OK St wins out, we get jumped. There is no way OK they will jump us. If OK St loses, we control our own destiny.
/thread
Referencing a made up ESPN metric.. So "surprised" coming from a Bama/SEC fan.
Don't see both 3 and 4 happening. But I don't think both Stanford and USC need to be in the championship game. One of them just needs to win it.
If we get lucky and OU finishes 10-2, OK State finishes 11-1, and Baylor finishes 11-1....do you guys (or anyone else) think that there is any way that ND finishes outside the top 4? Regardless of how Navy/USC/Stanford/Temple finish the year? I think at that point, only a scenario with a 12-1 UNC/Clemson or a 13-0 Iowa and 12-1 Ohio State could give us any issue.
If we get lucky and OU finishes 10-2, OK State finishes 11-1, and Baylor finishes 11-1....do you guys (or anyone else) think that there is any way that ND finishes outside the top 4? Regardless of how Navy/USC/Stanford/Temple finish the year? I think at that point, only a scenario with a 12-1 UNC/Clemson or a 13-0 Iowa and 12-1 Ohio State could give us any issue.
No way ND is left out in your scenario
90% sure OK State gets in at 12 0
10 1 Oklahoma beating 11 0 Oklahoma State gives Oklahoma 50/50 shot imo
I still believe OSU will beat MSt, then lose to scUM. Then OSU jail sexes Iowa.
SMH... that's why like 99% of the board would give their pinky toe not to play Bama in the first round. Eye test, record, SOS, they have it. You don't have to be a homer to see that. Yes you can question some FCS scheduling, but it's funny to not think them a top 4 team given the alternatives. I do not believe they should be #1, but they are definitely in the top 4.
Agree. I do think both will happen though.
I'm looking so much forward to you eating crow homey.
Minus Tabasco.
You have been wrong for 3 weeks.
Minimum two.
How can he possibly be wrong? 50/50 means both outcomes are equally likely. It's a binary problem, one or the other is going to happen (assuming we get to that point) but all he's saying is there's no good way to know what the result will be going in to it.
I'm looking so much forward to you eating crow homey.
Minus Tabasco.
You have been wrong for 3 weeks.
Minimum two.
-Alabama is #2 because they've played a tough schedule. Not based on the eye test in my opinion anyway because outside of the last 2 weeks they haven't really impressed me all season. That loss to Ole Miss looks more and more atrocious as the weeks wear on.
If OSU beats MSU then loses to UM, UM is in the BIG CG. Most UM fans seem to think that a win vs OSU and Iowa would put the first 2 loss team into the playoffs.
Simple logic at work here. The committee sees NDs loss as really .990 of a win. Win out and your in dependent on OKSt losing. OU will not pass ND and Iowa only jumps in if they beat OSU which would eliminate OSU. Bonus round is teams on our schedule keep winning as noted above (Looking at you Navy, USC, Stanford, Pitt, Texas, Temple), and our 2 PAC 12 opponents play in a PAC12 CG.
Read the last 3 weeks.
That's how?
No 180 here btw home slice.
Alabama has 7 wins against teams in the top 40 FPI. That's more than any other team. And they will have to beat Florida to win the SEC CG (given they win the IB). Your argument is ridiculous.
Not really. I won't argue something so far fetched. It's a waste of my time.
If OSU beats MSU then loses to UM, UM is in the BIG CG. Most UM fans seem to think that a win vs OSU and Iowa would put the first 2 loss team into the playoffs.
Simple logic at work here. The committee sees NDs loss as really .990 of a win. Win out and your in dependent on OKSt losing. OU will not pass ND and Iowa only jumps in if they beat OSU which would eliminate OSU. Bonus round is teams on our schedule keep winning as noted above (Looking at you Navy, USC, Stanford, Pitt, Texas, Temple), and our 2 PAC 12 opponents play in a PAC12 CG.
Dismissive with an overwhelming bouquet of superiority. Vintage. Put the cork back in it for further aging, though I am not sure the taste will improve.
#FREEPATStanding pat
Sent via tapatalk
If we are SOLIDLY #4, and if #5 Iowa is "Better" than either of the OKs, how are we in trouble in the committee's view? That sounds like the committee rates us SIGNIFICANTLY better than the OKs.
Thank goodness that the committee is composed of football people of many years experience and not eye-test players [Pollack, Galloway, even Herbstreit] or IE pessimists. These people are rewarding body-of-work and not just the last game.