PutuporShutup
Banned
- Messages
- 4,824
- Reaction score
- 1,909
I think at times the coverage (especially with ash) is obvious to fans and the opposing teams. Take the TD play with 13 seconds on the clock. That was pretty clearly Cover 1 with 2 lbs ready to help underneath crossers. With 13 seconds left (really one play), why would you run cover 1 with stroman in center field and tae closer to the LOS. IF you play Dime cover 2 and give up 5-10 yards it just shortens the FG attempt. It was like in that moment ash said, ok, they're getting nothing here, after you just played soft coverage the 3-4 plays prior.I don't know how any fan or media member can actually call out play calling because, you know, none of them actually know what the play call is. I mean, sure, you can make an educated guess when watching the film what it looks like is supposed to happen, but that assumes what you're seeing is executed correctly by the players. According to MMFF, that's not happening.
I think people are too often to jump to: bad play result = bad play call. That's not always the case.
That said, the defense is a mess and there's plenty of experience and talent out there for that not to be the case. So, something is clearly wrong.
You're asking our DBs (Zackery) to hold up with a four man rush, cover 1, no help, and your edge rushers are junior and logan thomas (not good rushers). Now, zackery does a good job of pushing him to the safety help at first but he gets burned allowing the WR to cut back to the open area, that can't happen with that call in that scenario.
Bad call, personnel usage and execution. If freeman only believes it's the execution portion of that, then the D will NOT be improving that much.

