Biden Presidency

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,605
Reaction score
20,077
Biden was always a SS and Medicare hawk ..... right up until he got elected President.



Excellent article documenting Biden's stance on SS and Medicare was largely consistent prior to him getting elected President. Now he is the champion of SS. I'm in agreement with Biden's stances prior to getting elected. Something needs to be done, but their is absolutely no appetite for this in the general public or in Washington.


1675970991253.png
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
It's not really surprising that Joe lies, and that's not even the problem. The problem is that half the country KNOWS he's lying and doesn't care. And those nitwits are the reason we get a perpetually dishonest, low IQ, career politician in the White House. We joked during the Trump years that the TDS/Orange Man Bad crowd would vote for a bucket of shit just to get rid of Trump. Well, apparently they did.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Imagine him doubling down on a rumor that's been debunked a number of times, but remains a fearmongering lie they push. That was an amusing moment in the speech though.



Heck are you going on about?

Rick Scott counts as "some republicans". Rick Scott wants to sunset all legislation and that includes Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

From Point 6 of his "Rescue America Plan"
  • All federal legislation sunsets in 5 years. If a law is worth keeping, Congress can pass it again.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Imagine him doubling down on a rumor that's been debunked a number of times, but remains a fearmongering lie they push. That was an amusing moment in the speech though.



Since we use old political quotes around here, Mike Lee counts as "some republicans" too.

Mike Lee in 2010 said,

"One of the biggest places we have to start is I believe with entitlements," Lee said. "There's nothing in here [Lee holds up a copy of the Constitution] that gives them the power to redistribute my wealth, yet that's what entitlement programs are—they're a wealth redistribution."

"I'm here right now to tell you one thing you probably have never heard from a politician: It will be my objective to phase out Social Security, to pull it up from the roots and get rid of it,"

"People who advise me politically always tell me it's dangerous and I tell them, 'In that case it's not worth my running.' That's why I'm doing this, to get rid of that. Medicare and Medicaid are of the same sort, they need to be pulled up."


Now Lee, never really acted on those statements and now says,

"Throughout my first campaign and from the day I took office, I have been clear: we must honor our commitments to retirees."

"That has been reflected in every vote I've cast, every bill I've introduced, and every speech I've given regarding Social Security. One of the first bills I sponsored would have ensured the viability of the Social Security program for the next 75 years,"

Doesn't matter what Lee thinks or does, he said it.... He counts.


I bet if I were to go digging I can find pleeeenty of Republicans wanting to mess with SS, Medicare/Medicaid benefits.
 
Last edited:

Rockin’Irish

Hearing Impaired
Messages
3,245
Reaction score
2,509
"ArMy oF 87,000 iRs AgEnTs"


Now if we could simplify the ridiculously complex federal tax code, we could run this part of our bloated government more efficiently. I would love to see a Federal employee reduction, talk about an earth shattering thought! Maybe that would reduce our taxes……
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,399
Since we use old political quotes around here, Mike Lee counts as "some republicans" too.

Mike Lee in 2010 said,

"One of the biggest places we have to start is I believe with entitlements," Lee said. "There's nothing in here [Lee holds up a copy of the Constitution] that gives them the power to redistribute my wealth, yet that's what entitlement programs are—they're a wealth redistribution."

"I'm here right now to tell you one thing you probably have never heard from a politician: It will be my objective to phase out Social Security, to pull it up from the roots and get rid of it,"

"People who advise me politically always tell me it's dangerous and I tell them, 'In that case it's not worth my running.' That's why I'm doing this, to get rid of that. Medicare and Medicaid are of the same sort, they need to be pulled up."


Now Lee, never really acted on those statements and now says,

"Throughout my first campaign and from the day I took office, I have been clear: we must honor our commitments to retirees."

"That has been reflected in every vote I've cast, every bill I've introduced, and every speech I've given regarding Social Security. One of the first bills I sponsored would have ensured the viability of the Social Security program for the next 75 years,"

Doesn't matter what Lee thinks or does, he said it.... He counts.


I bet if I were to go digging I can find pleeeenty of Republicans wanting to mess with SS, Medicare/Medicaid benefits.

It's fear mongering. It hasn't been proposed, and as mentioned Lee hasn't suggested it once after his initial campaign in 2010. The comments are taken out of context, which makes sense given the fact no such proposal has come to the floor:


In a statement posted by Lee on Twitter, the senator said the point he was trying to make was that the federal government should not be trusted with “sweeping power over people’s livelihoods,” claiming Congress has long used Social Security as a “slush fund.” Lee also said his point was that Congress had a responsibility to honor the commitments made to Americans who paid into Social Security.

“In repeatedly quoting my 2010 remarks today, President Biden conveniently left out that critical detail – that even when I voiced that position, I insisted that we honor the reliance interests of those who have paid into the system,” said Lee. “He also ignored in my 12 years in the Senate, I have never proposed abolishing Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits. Instead, I have offered solutions to improve those programs and move them toward solvency.”

As far as Rick Scott, he has a very small minority support for his America Rescue Plan and McConnell has said he doesn't support anything that removes Social Security, or Medicare. The plan doesn't directly address mention ending either, and Scott's position in the past has been to prevent them from going bankrupt. Looks more like he wants to protect these programs:

Scott announced he is introducing a new bill that would make it more difficult for Congress to make any cuts to Social Security and Medicare and that would send the Inflation Reduction Act’s $80 billion in Internal Revenue Service funding to Social Security and Medicare instead.

Scott never specifically mentioned Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in his call for sunsetting all federal legislation in five years, but he has acknowledged that they would be included. Scott says his aim would be to “fix,” not end, the programs.
 

Rockin’Irish

Hearing Impaired
Messages
3,245
Reaction score
2,509
Just wanted to point out that the object is not identified… meaning it’s an Unidentified Flying Object… UFO.

Also it wasn’t drifting or floating…….it was hovering. Does this mean it was “powered“?
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
It's fear mongering. It hasn't been proposed, and as mentioned Lee hasn't suggested it once after his initial campaign in 2010. The comments are taken out of context, which makes sense given the fact no such proposal has come to the floor:




As far as Rick Scott, he has a very small minority support for his America Rescue Plan and McConnell has said he doesn't support anything that removes Social Security, or Medicare. The plan doesn't directly address mention ending either, and Scott's position in the past has been to prevent them from going bankrupt. Looks more like he wants to protect these programs:


So Biden wasn't lying. Thanks for coming around.

Please explain away what Ron Johnson said in August for me,

We’ve got to turn everything into discretionary spending, so it’s all evaluated, so that we can fix problems or fix programs that are broken, that are going to be going bankrupt. Because, again, as long as things are on automatic pilot, we just continue to pile up debt.”

 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Ron Desantis?

"A CNN KFile review of comments from DeSantis’ 2012 congressional campaign found he repeatedly said he supported plans to replace Medicare with a system in which the government paid for partial costs of private plans or a traditional Medicare plan. In one interview with a local newspaper, DeSantis said he supported “the same thing” for Social Security, citing the need for “market forces” to restructure the program."

 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,399
So Biden wasn't lying. Thanks for coming around.

Please explain away what Ron Johnson said in August for me,

We’ve got to turn everything into discretionary spending, so it’s all evaluated, so that we can fix problems or fix programs that are broken, that are going to be going bankrupt. Because, again, as long as things are on automatic pilot, we just continue to pile up debt.”


No need to be an ass. Scott is the one that made the comment, and it's not a position the party supports. His position isn't even to do away with them, it's to fix the programs.

Johnson's comments are similar. They want to address the current budget practices and make sustaining it a priority:

"We've got to put everything on-budget so we're forced to prioritize spending," Johnson said. "That doesn't mean putting on the chopping block. That doesn't mean cutting Social Security. But it does mean prioritizing."

Johnson also said the current structure of Social Security is unsustainable.

"It's a legal Ponzi scheme," Johnson said, echoing an argument he first made in his 2010 Senate campaign, one he's repeated during his dozen years in office.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Republican Study Committee?

'The Republican Study Committee, the largest group of House Republicans, released a budget plan in June that called on lawmakers to gradually raise the Medicare age of eligibility to 67 and the Social Security eligibility to 70 before indexing both to life expectancy. It backed withholding payments to those who retired early and had earnings over a certain limit. And it endorsed the consideration of options to reduce payroll taxes that fund Social Security and redirect them to private alternatives. It also urged lawmakers to “phase-in an increase in means testing” for Medicare.'

 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
No need to be an ass. Scott is the one that made the comment, and it's not a position the party supports. His position isn't even to do away with them, it's to fix the programs.
Nah, I'm gonna be an ass because even now you are still down playing it despite what the republican party has been saying FOR YEARS!
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,399
Republican Study Committee?

'The Republican Study Committee, the largest group of House Republicans, released a budget plan in June that called on lawmakers to gradually raise the Medicare age of eligibility to 67 and the Social Security eligibility to 70 before indexing both to life expectancy. It backed withholding payments to those who retired early and had earnings over a certain limit. And it endorsed the consideration of options to reduce payroll taxes that fund Social Security and redirect them to private alternatives. It also urged lawmakers to “phase-in an increase in means testing” for Medicare.'


I've got no problem with private alternatives. I'd rather be in control of my own money, I can do more with it than the government can. I don't see anything there about them suggesting eliminating Social Security. You did leave out that "Social Security’s Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund is projected to be depleted after 2034, according to the program’s board of trustees." So if something isn't done to either raise taxes, or adjust benefits and eligibility then the program will cease to be solvent. Searching for solutions to preserving Social Security is the opposite of ending it, which is what Biden and many Democrats have been pushing for years. Again...fear mongering BS. It's not been proposed in Congress and it won't be.
 

GoIrish41

Paterfamilius
Messages
9,929
Reaction score
2,120
I've got no problem with private alternatives. I'd rather be in control of my own money, I can do more with it than the government can. I don't see anything there about them suggesting eliminating Social Security. You did leave out that "Social Security’s Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund is projected to be depleted after 2034, according to the program’s board of trustees." So if something isn't done to either raise taxes, or adjust benefits and eligibility then the program will cease to be solvent. Searching for solutions to preserving Social Security is the opposite of ending it, which is what Biden and many Democrats have been pushing for years. Again...fear mongering BS. It's not been proposed in Congress and it won't be.
Maybe Congress should return the money they looted from the fund to pay for things which it was not intended. Solvency solved.
 
Last edited:

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,407
Reaction score
5,824
Heck are you going on about?

Rick Scott counts as "some republicans". Rick Scott wants to sunset all legislation and that includes Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

From Point 6 of his "Rescue America Plan"
  • All federal legislation sunsets in 5 years. If a law is worth keeping, Congress can pass it again.
So, can I say that Democrats want to do… everything Cori Bush or Elizabeth Warren propose?

Can I take Bernie as the party?

It’s such a dishonest move that I’m glad the GOP interrupted.

Rick Scott is an idiot and one guy.
 

Rockin’Irish

Hearing Impaired
Messages
3,245
Reaction score
2,509
Instead of the politicians using rhetoric (old and new) trying to make themselves look good, maybe it would be constructive to work on a resolution. Continually blaming one another will most likely never produce a decent result. It makes me think that they don’t really have any decent ideas on how to fix the SS situation so it will work as originally intended AND be self sustaining.
 

SeekNDestroy

Well-known member
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
4,524
So, can I say that Democrats want to do… everything Cori Bush or Elizabeth Warren propose?

Can I take Bernie as the party?

It’s such a dishonest move that I’m glad the GOP interrupted.

Rick Scott is an idiot and one guy.
So where’s the lie? It’s politics, bro.
Are there any honest Republicans?

And Bernie isn’t a Democrat; he caucuses with Democrats.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
I've got no problem with private alternatives. I'd rather be in control of my own money, I can do more with it than the government can. I don't see anything there about them suggesting eliminating Social Security. You did leave out that "Social Security’s Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund is projected to be depleted after 2034, according to the program’s board of trustees." So if something isn't done to either raise taxes, or adjust benefits and eligibility then the program will cease to be solvent. Searching for solutions to preserving Social Security is the opposite of ending it, which is what Biden and many Democrats have been pushing for years. Again...fear mongering BS. It's not been proposed in Congress and it won't be.
Cool story. I'm glad you agree that some Republicans (including yourself) want to cut Social Security benefits.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
Cool story. I'm glad you agree that some Republicans (including yourself) want to cut Social Security benefits.
I (and many Republicans and Joe Biden pre-presidency) definitely want changes to be made which results in reduction of payments in some way to ensure that SS remains viable. These can be a combination of increasing the retirement age, changing the cost of living index, reduction of benefits, eliminating the benefit for the wealthy etc etc etc

It’s obvious you don’t agree. This means that you want SS to die.

See, we can play this game too.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
I (and many Republicans and Joe Biden pre-presidency) definitely want changes to be made which results in reduction of payments in some way to ensure that SS remains viable. These can be a combination of increasing the retirement age, changing the cost of living index, reduction of benefits, eliminating the benefit for the wealthy etc etc etc

It’s obvious you don’t agree. This means that you want SS to die.

See, we can play this game too.
Lol, figured this would be the pivot. Get called out and now it's all "well, yes I do actually want to cut it, we just don't want to call it that."

At least we are past the nonsense that you (edit - ukulele not you, apologies) were spreading in here about Biden lying about GOP plans for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
Lol, figured this would be the pivot. Get called out and now it's all "well, yes I do actually want to cut it, we just don't want to call it that."

At least we are past the nonsense that you were spreading in here about Biden lying about GOP plans for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
Look at my posts. My stance has never changed or pivoted. I said nothing about your prior focus. But so good of you to try to deflect.

Do you think cuts should be made to SS to keep it solvent???? No changes ….. automatic cuts at approximately 2035 estimated 20% reduction. Your choice…. Which one?
 
Top