BC Postgame

T-Boone

Well-known member
Messages
8,400
Reaction score
4,795
I categorically disagree. Too many teams play each other that are competing for spots. Take care of business and things will work themselves out
Too few of the key results we need are going NDs way. That has been a trend for 3 or 4 weeks. It doesn't have the same vibe as last year with all the right upsets happening then. Vandy loss was good but Texas now has a better claim then ND if they win out. From here I give it 55/45 chance a 10-2 ND gets in.
 

InKellyWeTrust

Well-known member
Messages
2,955
Reaction score
3,387
Isnt it mainly that we have our 2 best OL fellows out injured and the replacements are brand new?
I don't think so. Its BC. We came out and threw the ball 4 straight times, instead of setting the tone and pushing them off the los and pounding the run. Questionable 3rd down anf 4th down calls is a trend. He gets too cute.
 

MacIrish75

The New Logo is a Jinx
Messages
9,195
Reaction score
17,740
I get it, but a bad drive is going to happen and it's important to remember that we overcame the absolute worst call by an ACC crew this year (and that is a high, high bar) and still held them to only 3 on that drive.
Honestly I thought BC schemed and called a pretty good drive. We helped them a bit, but their QB didn’t try and do too much and took what he was given.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,104
Reaction score
27,367
Offense is in an interesting spot in that Boise, NC State and BC have all loaded the box and played man coverage. It has led to Carr almost exclusively throwing deep it feels like. There have been some frustrating 1st and 10s where it’s like do you really need to throw deep and have it be incomplete right now. The payoff is 40 yard post routes being wide open enough times a game to payoff multiple touchdowns.

Need more short pass solutions to this type of defense. Pitt will be better at it than the above three.
 

Floribama50

Active member
Messages
43
Reaction score
137
If someone asked would you be disappointed if the defense gave up 10 points, I’d say yes. If someone asked would you be disappointed if the offense scored 25 points, I wouldn’t think you were serious.
 

rtrn2glory

Well-known member
Messages
16,168
Reaction score
6,450
I guess we need to just put you on the committee then because unfortunately I don't see them finding that performance against 1-7 team to be acceptable of a team that is supposed to be one of the 12 best teams in the country
 

MacIrish75

The New Logo is a Jinx
Messages
9,195
Reaction score
17,740
I watched the whole game too. That’s why I understand the nuance of the game and that ND was never really in trouble.
I guess we’ll see. I just tend to feel like as a two loss team, we’ve got to win PLUS look good doing so.

I don’t think anybody here (and you know this) doesn’t want us to make the playoffs. There’s just concern that we may be leaving too much up to a committee of humans whose interests don’t reflect our own.
 

FDNYIrish1

ARE YOU SUPPORTIVE OF THESE ONESIES???
Messages
3,014
Reaction score
5,228
I get it, but a bad drive is going to happen and it's important to remember that we overcame the absolute worst call by an ACC crew this year (and that is a high, high bar) and still held them to only 3 on that drive.
Agreed. It was a frustrating day as it seemed our front was just about to make a big play and were so close to changing the momentum. Still hard to be disappointed completely, the guys played hard as always. I didn’t get to see the first quarter, I’ll have to find it later.
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,105
Reaction score
5,458
Offense is in an interesting spot in that Boise, NC State and BC have all loaded the box and played man coverage. It has led to Carr almost exclusively throwing deep it feels like. There have been some frustrating 1st and 10s where it’s like do you really need to throw deep and have it be incomplete right now. The payoff is 40 yard post routes being wide open enough times a game to payoff multiple touchdowns.

Need more short pass solutions to this type of defense. Pitt will be better at it than the above three.
Wasn’t that the rumored on him in spring/fall practice? Too many shots down the field?
 

Bane

Well-known member
Messages
2,303
Reaction score
4,844
I guess we’ll see. I just tend to feel like as a two loss team, we’ve got to win PLUS look good doing so.

I don’t think anybody here (and you know this) doesn’t want us to make the playoffs. There’s just concern that we may be leaving too much up to a committee of humans whose interests don’t reflect our own.
I mean to be fair this is the worst we've looked all season probably. Maybe the first half of the Purdue game or the first half of Boise, but this is the first time we didn't rally to cover with a dominant second half. Bama just got all they could handle and then some from SCAR last week, everyone has a bad game. I get we have 2 losses but there's still a lot of season left and teams will drop games. I don't think this week would be the reason we don't get in or whatever.
 

NDPhilly

Philly Torqued
Messages
16,441
Reaction score
16,721
I just think you can’t discount the fact that BC’s QB played at a very high level for 3/4 of the game. Our game plan on D was to keep everything in front of us and force him to be accurate. He uncharacteristically was, until we decided to turn up the heat late.
 
Last edited:

InKellyWeTrust

Well-known member
Messages
2,955
Reaction score
3,387
I mean to be fair this is the worst we've looked all season probably. Maybe the first half of the Purdue game or the first half of Boise, but this is the first time we didn't rally to cover with a dominant second half. Bama just got all they could handle and then some from SCAR last week, everyone has a bad game. I get we have 2 losses but there's still a lot of season left and teams will drop games. I don't think this week would be the reason we don't get in or whatever.
Form, eye test, whatever matters. And when you don't look the part AND the resume (SOR, wins against ranked teams, etc) is questionable, there isn't much else to turn to.
 

TNUtoNotreDame

Voted must gracious poster for seven years running
Messages
3,127
Reaction score
2,963
Pitt will be foaming at the mouth to play us in a few weeks
The game is incredibly scary now and I would not be surprised if we lose by two touchdowns. Narduzzi at minimum will have the boys ready and excited we cannot let them hang around like we did tonight.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,544
Reaction score
28,990
1. They make way too many losing plays, do too many "little things" wrong. They are winning because they are a very, very talented team that can overcome all of that.

2. I was not happy with the O. You get 450+ yards you have to turn that into more than 25 points. They "should have" scored 31... that's not good enough against a team like BC. See Point 1, they self-destruct too much.

3. The kicking game is beyond a joke. The idea of getting a proven kicker in the portal is great, but if you are *never* getting kids out of high school that can get the job done then you are one injury away from catastrophe and that's what we saw part of last year + most this year. The fact that they got a "top 5" kicker that can't make chip shot field goals or extra points is the biggest "what the fuck?" ever. Did Biagi even have him come kick for him? If not, why? We would literally have been better off having an open kicking session for any interested high school senior and they would've found someone better.
 
Last edited:

MacIrish75

The New Logo is a Jinx
Messages
9,195
Reaction score
17,740
1. They make way too many losing plays, do too many "little things" wrong. They are winning because they are a very, very talented team that can overcome all of that.

2. I was not happy with the O. You get 450+ yards you have to turn that into more than 25 points. They "should have" scored 31... that's not good enough against a team like BC. See Point 1, they self-destruct too much. Running backs going for less than 2 yards a carry, how are you

3. The kicking game is beyond a joke. The idea of getting a proven kicker in the portal is great, but if you are *never* getting kids out of high school that can get the job done then you are one injury away from catastrophe and that's what we saw part of last year + most this year. The fact that they got a "top 5" kicker that can't make chip shot field goals or extra points is the biggest "what the fuck?" ever. Did Biagi even have him come kick for him? If not, why? We would literally have been better off having an open kicking session for any interested high school senior and they would've found someone better.
We shouldn’t recruit kickers and take two xfers a year at kicker.

The thing about kicking is level and division don’t really matter. Kicking a PAT or 50 harder in FCS or D2 is literally the same as D1. It’s different than other positions—even punter.
 

ColinKSU

Well-known member
Messages
4,647
Reaction score
6,163
This offense sure feels like “Hope Love or Price breaks one and only chuck it deep if you have to throw.”

Seems weird when your QB isn’t a consistent deep ball thrower.
 
Top