Al Golden

FOTY977

Well-known member
Messages
1,159
Reaction score
1,691
If Golden leaves, and Mickens is still here there is a 100% chance he gets the job if he wants it.

I would literally be shocked if they even interviewed anyone for the job.

My guess is that it would be announced in the same announcement.
I’m old enough to remember the board calling this “lazy hires” when Kelly did it 😂
 

DomeFieldAdvantage

Well-known member
Messages
327
Reaction score
529
If Pete is really certain it isn't Mickens, I wonder if its because Freeman has a scheme change in mind and wants to bring in someone to handle that. Once that person inevitably leaves in a few years, then maybe he hands the reins over to Mickens who would then have more varied experiences to draw from for when he runs his own defense.
 

Bane

Well-known member
Messages
2,303
Reaction score
4,844
I’m old enough to remember the board calling this “lazy hires” when Kelly did it 😂
Well to be fair, Kelly hadn't shown a really strong ability to hire excellent coordinators, and often went back to the same well for retread hires over and over again. It wasn't until his job was in real jeopardy after 2016 that he begrudgingly changed that habit. That led to 3 great DC hires in a row.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,104
Reaction score
12,943
If Pete is really certain it isn't Mickens, I wonder if its because Freeman has a scheme change in mind and wants to bring in someone to handle that. Once that person inevitably leaves in a few years, then maybe he hands the reins over to Mickens who would then have more varied experiences to draw from for when he runs his own defense.
Actually it's because Mickens is leaving to take the AFC Richmond job.
 

Redbar

Well-known member
Messages
3,531
Reaction score
806
Well to be fair, Kelly hadn't shown a really strong ability to hire excellent coordinators, and often went back to the same well for retread hires over and over again. It wasn't until his job was in real jeopardy after 2016 that he begrudgingly changed that habit. That led to 3 great DC hires in a row.
He didn’t change that habit and he didn’t make those hires. That was Swarbrick keeping his sorry ass afloat.
 

NDFAN2008

Well-known member
Messages
7,330
Reaction score
5,655
If Pete is really certain it isn't Mickens, I wonder if its because Freeman has a scheme change in mind and wants to bring in someone to handle that. Once that person inevitably leaves in a few years, then maybe he hands the reins over to Mickens who would then have more varied experiences to draw from for when he runs his own defense.
I was thinking the same thing do we go more towards a 3-4 base defense next year. We should be deep at LB and guys like ASA and Farimo could rush in certain situations
 

Irish8248

Well-known member
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
880
After Freeman has spent 4 years building the defense to his scheme via recruiting is the perfect time to change schemes
Lets not even change the recruiting class philosophy in the class we just signed or are targeting now. Wing it, we're playing prevent or fire blitz lol
 

DomeFieldAdvantage

Well-known member
Messages
327
Reaction score
529
After Freeman has spent 4 years building the defense to his scheme via recruiting is the perfect time to change schemes
I mean, we don't really know if he was building towards the current scheme or a different one this whole time. When you really look at the last three classes, the ones he really fully recruited, there are a lot of guys who don't really have a clean position fit in the current defense. We kind of fit them in where we think they will go, but maybe the role they are supposed to fill is even part of the defense yet.

Meanwhile, some of the most indispensable players on this defense are from the pre-Freeman era. Maybe we play the way we play because of what they allow us to do, but we have a schematic change coming so we don't have to rely on having one of the best players in the country playing centerfield and having two disruptive monsters on the interior of the line.

I heard an analyst say something along the lines of if you can play cover 1 man and win doing it, you do that, but at the highest levels its just not really possible. And I think we might see that in this coming game. Everyone says how its a bad matchup for our defense. Maybe Freeman knows that, has known that, and has been preparing for a future where we have other options.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,110
Reaction score
27,369
I mean, we don't really know if he was building towards the current scheme or a different one this whole time. When you really look at the last three classes, the ones he really fully recruited, there are a lot of guys who don't really have a clean position fit in the current defense. We kind of fit them in where we think they will go, but maybe the role they are supposed to fill is even part of the defense yet.

Meanwhile, some of the most indispensable players on this defense are from the pre-Freeman era. Maybe we play the way we play because of what they allow us to do, but we have a schematic change coming so we don't have to rely on having one of the best players in the country playing centerfield and having two disruptive monsters on the interior of the line.

I heard an analyst say something along the lines of if you can play cover 1 man and win doing it, you do that, but at the highest levels its just not really possible. And I think we might see that in this coming game. Everyone says how its a bad matchup for our defense. Maybe Freeman knows that, has known that, and has been preparing for a future where we have other options.

I disagree completely
 

Kingbish01

Well-known member
Messages
3,414
Reaction score
2,375
My Son has a childhood friend that starts on Def for the Bengals. This player at least hasn't heard of any behind the scene deals yet...But Al Golden is def high on their list.
 
Top