What if he had taco bell for lunch and the massive BM occurred hours ago?Just waiting for @BobbyMac to drop a massive BM for this prediction
Merck has returned!!!!!FUNDS are abundant
I do not know who Merck is but...
Who do we like more: Walton or BonnerGet Osborne. Push hard for Walton. Get Walton. Call it a day.
Like them both but IMO the best '26 RB combo is JO & Bonner followed by JO & Walton then Walton & BonnerWho do we like more: Walton or Bonner
After watching more film, I'd put Bonner ahead of Walton. I'd still take Walton, though. He may be more likely as he's still scheduled to OV Stanford, which means that he values academics. That's not to say Bonner doesn't, though.Who do we like more: Walton or Bonner
There really needs to be a warning for NSFW contentEJ flipped his pick to ND.
We got him ladies and gents
My exact preferenceLike them both but IMO the best '26 RB combo is JO & Bonner followed by JO & Walton then Walton & Bonner
don't know about Walton but i've read that Bonner is a speed type backWho do we like more: Walton or Bonner
All 3 are great backs and any combo of these 3 would be huge a get if possible to do so. What it ultimately comes down to for the ideal combo is nothing more personal preference because talent wise they are all about the same but even then it's really just splitting hairs because the gap is so minimal between them that ND isn't going to pass on one to wait for there ideal preference.don't know about Walton but i've read that Bonner is a speed type back
He’s so damn quick. Reminds me of a smaller Lesean McCoy.
If you’re going to ding him for anything it’s size and maybe top end speed.
Looks like Banjo Boy from Deliverance.
WhereISD saying he'll be Irish.
On ISDWhere
Whatd he say this time![]()
What can Michigan do to beat Notre Dame for Top 100 RB Javian Osborne? He and his father explain...
Sherrone Moore and the Michigan Wolverines are working hard on top football recruits from around the country.www.on3.com
What a ridiculous piece from someone that is supposed to be objective.