No idea but they need Numbers. Been saying for awhile that they needed numbers this cycle and it looks like we're getting there.Are we going to lose 4 CBs?
Why aren't we after any Portal guys? Tony Grimes from UNC would be niceWe're down to Henderson, Lewis and Watts from '20, and who knows what the former 2 end up doing.
'21, we lost Gee and JoJo already and have yet to see much of anything from Tucker, Riley and Barnes.
And we just lost Bellamy from '22.
Gotta load up on d-backs, especially if we're going to run a lot of nickel.
Hard to load up when they keep leaving. Are we worried about Lewis going next?We're down to Henderson, Lewis and Watts from '20, and who knows what the former 2 end up doing.
'21, we lost Gee and JoJo already and have yet to see much of anything from Tucker, Riley and Barnes.
And we just lost Bellamy from '22.
Gotta load up on d-backs, especially if we're going to run a lot of nickel.
It'll be hard to land him. I imagine he'll want to go somewhere to start.Why aren't we after any Portal guys? Tony Grimes from UNC would be nice
The more I think about this post, the more I would not be surprised if there is room for both Barnes and Davis.No idea but they need Numbers. Been saying for awhile that they needed numbers this cycle and it looks like we're getting there.
In hindsight, they royally fucked last cycle at DB. For a class that needed DB's, they ended up with 3 that turned into 2. Now, it looks like they got 2 good ones but it's still just two for a team that likes to utilize 5 DB's. So, in order to balance it out they're making sure they get their numbers this cycle. 2 last cycle, 5 "committed" this cycle, plus Hillman (maybe) and ?. That gets you to 9 DB's over 2 cycles. Which is essentially the recruiting you'd see for a 5 DB system. It makes sense. The only problem is, it likely creates a log jam that will need to be worked out in the future.
Anything new here?
#TooSoonsigned with Oregon
good thing ND got on him early huh#TooSoon