Gentlemen, we've seen this sort of thing many times at ND and I'll bet they see it all over.
The best eye-test guy still needs to know what the hell to do better than the next guy or
he is NOT the better player. Way back when I first found IE, ND had a LB who wowed the eye-test
(forget his name --- made a film session by jumping out of a swimming pool flatfooted.) Really
nice guy, but could not pick up any part of the scheme well enough to play. It was sadly
pathetic. He was trying and couldn't make it click. (and classroom brains do NOT always
translate to this sort of thing --- especially with linebacking, it is a different sort of intelligence
(more akin to geospatial intelligence+ Kinetic awareness than analysis --- Magic Johnson "saw"
things before they happened. He was not the best eye-test athlete.) That ND wonderful athlete
was never really functional at anything but special teams. Another linebacking case was the big
guy who finally replaced Schmitt ... another wonderful fellow who couldn't get it either. Elko, out
of desperation, "solved" the problem by having him just battering ram one gap every play ---
hardly ideal, but we were really thin at LB talent then. That guy SLOWLY got a little better as the
season went on.
EYETEST does not equal better player.
General IQ does not necessarily translate into Magic Johnson awareness and instincts. How do
we not already know this? We've had loads of teaching examples.