Cackalacky2.0
Specimen
- Messages
- 8,628
- Reaction score
- 7,089
I’d wager if they sued them they could probably win at this point.Can we have our wins back now that they are toothless and giving heismans back to cheaters???
I’d wager if they sued them they could probably win at this point.Can we have our wins back now that they are toothless and giving heismans back to cheaters???
No, you move Mickens to DC; problem solved!If Golden leaves does that affect anyone?
I don't think ND needs to go to the portal at all for a transfer QB. Our O-line will be better, Love/Price/Williams will be a combo at RB, and I hope our WR's step up.I only see one reason that we take a portal QB. Cj Carrs elbow has him behind schedule and will not be full go come spring and/or fall. I'm assuming anything else is pure clickbait. Any other thoughts out there gentlemen?
Tbh if they have evidence of *direct* tampering (unlikely) this will open a can of worms.
Unless it’s the B1G looking for an opportunity to pick on little brother ACC. would they pull this if it was OSU that tampered or Texas in the SEC?Why? Who has the authority to enforce tampering? What rules are there against tampering. NCAA already admitted there is no portal and that any student is free to enroll and unenroll at their pleasure.
It seems to me all these “rules” are simply honor rules and not actually legally enforceable ones. That BIG statement reads to me like a non-binding strongly worded UN letter to a country who is acting up. Lmaoooo
What’s truly hilarious to me is that just last week the coaches association voted to agree to a 10 day portal window. Haha. Then the NCAA says that there isn’t a portal and apparently never was a portal.
That’s my point lol. It’s the Wild West and they acting like some rule was broken. Haha All because the perceived authority is now basically like:Unless it’s the B1G looking for an opportunity to pick on little brother ACC. would they pull this if it was OSU that tampered or Texas in the SEC?
Hard to argue they are not employees. Also despite how much tv, playoff, and conference revenue there is: it’s sounding like it’s gonna get stripped out way faster than people think Much like Mr Newton and his octo childrenThat’s my point lol. It’s the Wild West and they acting like some rule was broken. Haha All because the perceived authority is now basically like:
View attachment 3057929
The only way to move forward is for states to create their own legislation which is bound to be different state for state to regulate it and then there would end up being federal supremacy statutes and equal pay for equal work collective bargaining etc… I’m sure the die hard free market capitalists are totally gonna love that.
My counterpoint would be that contracts are contracts and nobody just lets people break a contract in the business world without some consideration.Guy doesn't want to be there. They should have let him go and still make the tampering allegations.
But the scholarships aren't contracts. The are an education benefit.My counterpoint would be that contracts are contracts and nobody just lets people break a contract in the business world without some consideration.
The scholarship isn't in question though is it? The contract is the NIL deal unique to the individual athleteBut the scholarships aren't contracts. The are an education benefit.
Agreed, and the answer is YES. There is no longer a situation where you can’t tell the NCAA to kick rocks- either as a team or an athlete. Every situation is now “if you want to try you better lawyer up!”Seeing what a shitshow the NCAA is just makes me more upset that we gave them all the information on the frozen 5. Every time I see those vacated wins on a list it pisses me off. Can’t we just tell the fuck you, those wins count?
I would argue that in the case of a college athlete receiving a scholarship to a university in return for the athlete agreeing to play the given sport for that university would be considered a two party contract. However, the scholarship itself is not a contract.But the scholarships aren't contracts. The are an education benefit.
How about partial scholarship athletes? For sports other than football where those take precedence and have to be full scholarships ?I would argue that in the case of a college athlete receiving a scholarship to a university in return for the athlete agreeing to play the given sport for that university would be considered a two party contract. However, the scholarship itself is not a contract.
One free transfer as an undergrad seems like a fine middle ground that would help rein in some of the transfer chaos, but apparently the NCAA is legally barred from enforcing basically anything at this point so....They need to go back to the sitting out a year if you decide to transfer. Or allowing a one time transfer rule. It’s getting ridiculous some kids transferring 3-4 times
Free market.They need to go back to the sitting out a year if you decide to transfer. Or allowing a one time transfer rule. It’s getting ridiculous some kids transferring 3-4 times
Markets operate more efficiently with some level of rules and transparency. This is more like the law of the jungle.Free market.
I agree but free market people don’t want efficiency. They want to be free to do what they want when they want. This is Friedman type economics in real time.Markets operate more efficiently with some level of rules and transparency. This is more like the law of the jungle.
We live in a society!I agree but free market people don’t want efficiency. They want to be free to do what they want when they want. This is Friedman type economics in real time.