2025 Transfer Portal

irishandy

Well-known member
Messages
3,980
Reaction score
1,565
I only see one reason that we take a portal QB. Cj Carrs elbow has him behind schedule and will not be full go come spring and/or fall. I'm assuming anything else is pure clickbait. Any other thoughts out there gentlemen?
I don't think ND needs to go to the portal at all for a transfer QB. Our O-line will be better, Love/Price/Williams will be a combo at RB, and I hope our WR's step up.

ASU wasn't a fit for Jayden Daniels and he made his name in Denbrock's offense.

QB should be between Angeli & Carr for a chance to make a name for themselves in Denbrock's offense.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
8,628
Reaction score
7,089
Like I said. The NCAA has always been powerless. They just convinced everyone they did have power. Legal challenges have now exposed them for what they are. A toothless organization with no real authority.

The portal doesn’t exist? lol. There never was a portal to start?


At this point I say let our new DTs come in and play on Monday and see what plays out.
 
Last edited:

NDFAN2008

Well-known member
Messages
5,695
Reaction score
4,445
Like I said they keep saying it’s highly likely they rule allowing kids 5 years but going away with the redshirt Leonard should get another year
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
36,251
Reaction score
22,242


Tbh if they have evidence of *direct* tampering (unlikely) this will open a can of worms.
 

INLaw

Hardcore chooch
Messages
4,377
Reaction score
3,914
A4 leagues
Da fuq?
Is this automatic qualifying 4.
Lets call a spade a spade here and its the haves and have nots. Or better yet power 2 and their little siblings momma forces them to bring a long.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
8,628
Reaction score
7,089


Tbh if they have evidence of *direct* tampering (unlikely) this will open a can of worms.

Why? Who has the authority to enforce tampering? What rules are there against tampering. NCAA already admitted there is no portal and that any student is free to enroll and unenroll at their pleasure.

It seems to me all these “rules” are simply honor rules and not actually legally enforceable ones. That BIG statement reads to me like a non-binding strongly worded UN letter to a country who is acting up. Lmaoooo

What’s truly hilarious to me is that just last week the coaches association voted to agree to a 10 day portal window. Haha. Then the NCAA says that there isn’t a portal and apparently never was a portal.
 
Last edited:

INLaw

Hardcore chooch
Messages
4,377
Reaction score
3,914
Why? Who has the authority to enforce tampering? What rules are there against tampering. NCAA already admitted there is no portal and that any student is free to enroll and unenroll at their pleasure.

It seems to me all these “rules” are simply honor rules and not actually legally enforceable ones. That BIG statement reads to me like a non-binding strongly worded UN letter to a country who is acting up. Lmaoooo

What’s truly hilarious to me is that just last week the coaches association voted to agree to a 10 day portal window. Haha. Then the NCAA says that there isn’t a portal and apparently never was a portal.
Unless it’s the B1G looking for an opportunity to pick on little brother ACC. would they pull this if it was OSU that tampered or Texas in the SEC?
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
8,628
Reaction score
7,089
Unless it’s the B1G looking for an opportunity to pick on little brother ACC. would they pull this if it was OSU that tampered or Texas in the SEC?
That’s my point lol. It’s the Wild West and they acting like some rule was broken. Haha All because the perceived authority is now basically like:

1737248493372.gif

The only way to move forward is for states to create their own legislation which is bound to be different state for state to regulate it and then there would end up being federal supremacy statutes and equal pay for equal work collective bargaining etc… I’m sure the die hard free market capitalists are totally gonna love that.
 

INLaw

Hardcore chooch
Messages
4,377
Reaction score
3,914
That’s my point lol. It’s the Wild West and they acting like some rule was broken. Haha All because the perceived authority is now basically like:

View attachment 3057929

The only way to move forward is for states to create their own legislation which is bound to be different state for state to regulate it and then there would end up being federal supremacy statutes and equal pay for equal work collective bargaining etc… I’m sure the die hard free market capitalists are totally gonna love that.
Hard to argue they are not employees. Also despite how much tv, playoff, and conference revenue there is: it’s sounding like it’s gonna get stripped out way faster than people think Much like Mr Newton and his octo children
 

317Irish

Grits are a$$
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
874
Seeing what a shitshow the NCAA is just makes me more upset that we gave them all the information on the frozen 5. Every time I see those vacated wins on a list it pisses me off. Can’t we just tell the fuck you, those wins count?
Agreed, and the answer is YES. There is no longer a situation where you can’t tell the NCAA to kick rocks- either as a team or an athlete. Every situation is now “if you want to try you better lawyer up!”
 

Rockin’Irish

Hearing Impaired
Messages
2,891
Reaction score
2,180
But the scholarships aren't contracts. The are an education benefit.
I would argue that in the case of a college athlete receiving a scholarship to a university in return for the athlete agreeing to play the given sport for that university would be considered a two party contract. However, the scholarship itself is not a contract.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
8,628
Reaction score
7,089
I’ll be concerned about contracts when I actually see a legally binding contract for a student athlete.

And further the schools aren’t allowed to have anything to do with paying players. It’s all supposed to be done by third parties. That’s like literally the only rule provided by state legislatures that have actually made laws about it. Wisconsin doesn’t t have any standing to enforce contracts because they can’t actually engage a student with a NIL contract let alone force him to stay at their school per the NCAAs own admission.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
8,628
Reaction score
7,089
I would argue that in the case of a college athlete receiving a scholarship to a university in return for the athlete agreeing to play the given sport for that university would be considered a two party contract. However, the scholarship itself is not a contract.
How about partial scholarship athletes? For sports other than football where those take precedence and have to be full scholarships ?

Wasn’t that an NCAA “rule”? How long before other sports get to take precedence? Do we even have a roster limit anymore? Class size restrictions?

I’m dead serious. We need to go ahead and get our four recent NIL signings into the team and have them ready to contribute by Monday. 😆 Let someone tell us we can’t do that.
 

NDFAN2008

Well-known member
Messages
5,695
Reaction score
4,445
They need to go back to the sitting out a year if you decide to transfer. Or allowing a one time transfer rule. It’s getting ridiculous some kids transferring 3-4 times
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
12,054
Reaction score
7,926
They need to go back to the sitting out a year if you decide to transfer. Or allowing a one time transfer rule. It’s getting ridiculous some kids transferring 3-4 times
One free transfer as an undergrad seems like a fine middle ground that would help rein in some of the transfer chaos, but apparently the NCAA is legally barred from enforcing basically anything at this point so....
 
Top