BobD
Can't get no satisfaction
- Messages
- 7,918
- Reaction score
- 1,034
What I find fascinating is the "love" Woods is getting on this site. It seems to me that the individuals who post on this site generally emphasize the ND student athlete is a model for not only academic excellence but just as important, they are individuals of high character (which I agree is a good reason to root for the Irish). Woods actions off the course could never be considered ethical, and on the course he often exhibits behavior that could be described as boorish (especially from someone who allegedly has so much "respect for the game").
Now I don't want this to evolve into a debate on the quality of Woods' character, but I am curious to know from those individuals willing to overlook Woods' character flaws (presumably because of his golfing talent) will also overlook or forgive indiscretions and/or questionable ethical decisions made by players and coaches at rival institutions (such as USC, Michigan, Ohio State, etc.)?
I won't pretend to be deeply religious, but I do like this
![]()
You obviously misinterpreted my post. I am not condeming Woods for his behavior. I am simply wondering why you would root for someone who wouldn't give you the time of day versus let's say Day or Snedeker?
I think I properly interpreted the essence of your post and replied with my answer as to why I am willing to overlook his shortcomings as a human being.
As for rooting for Day or Snedeker, well they're fairly boring.