So if JD doesn't come back, you want missed tackle Marist? I absolutely do not like to rag on these guys 1 bit, but my lord, he plays fast but is always out of position, runs past the play, or whiffs on the tackle. I'd much rather see Kiser than MaristHe's the one I want back. His blitz timing is impeccable and he obviously knows the defense. If not him, Marist. I don't want Kiser back, he would be disappointing as "the guy" in 2024 with younger guys around him. I hope JD gets some NIL cash.
Over Kiser, yes I would definitely take Marist. Kiser is not good, he's small, quick, and in the right spot. He doesn't hit hard (unlike JD), he doesn't cause havoc (unlike Marist in rushing). Marist certainly isn't great and likely why he'll be playing CFB again when he'd rather go pro I'm sure.So if JD doesn't come back, you want missed tackle Marist? I absolutely do not like to rag on these guys 1 bit, but my lord, he plays fast but is always out of position, runs past the play, or whiffs on the tackle. I'd much rather see Kiser than Marist
what makes you want marist back at all of any of them? He has absolutely no feel or instincts so I don't think he's help out the younger ones like betrand would, and possibly kiser.He's the one I want back. His blitz timing is impeccable and he obviously knows the defense. If not him, Marist. I don't want Kiser back, he would be disappointing as "the guy" in 2024 with younger guys around him. I hope JD gets some NIL cash.
He's the one I want back. His blitz timing is impeccable and he obviously knows the defense. If not him, Marist. I don't want Kiser back, he would be disappointing as "the guy" in 2024 with younger guys around him. I hope JD gets some NIL cash.
Marist can make a play, Kiser cannot. There's havoc potential to his game. Marist isn't great either, but can at least be disruptive. JD >>> Marist > Kiser.what makes you want marist back at all of any of them? He has absolutely no feel or instincts so I don't think he's help out the younger ones like betrand would, and possibly kiser.
I don't want the leader of the LB position to be someone that doesn't know what they're doing. Kiser isn't great, but he at least can lead the younger players. marist would be telling players to run into the linemen/rb/te that's blocking you as hard as possible hoping something good happens.
It's rather simple. Lberry doesn't want any LB on the roster that he personally can beat in the Oklahoma drillI wanted to engage so bad but I resisted. I'm very proud of my baby steps
Isn’t that what Marist did?Marist can make a play, Kiser cannot. There's havoc potential to his game. Marist isn't great either, but can at least be disruptive. JD >>> Marist > Kiser.
We need to break through the "can't make a play, but knows how to line up" LB run we've had for a decade, even if that means some young guys taking their lumps early on for a longer term pay off, or a hit or miss LB who can at least hit.
Isn’t that what Marist did?
The bolded, IMO; is based on his athleticism. He’d be a late Rounder or UDFA and seen as a promising project. I know injuries slowed his development but he is either making plays or making mistakes…no consistency. When looking at PFF grades, Marist has the biggest disparity w/ either one of the highest grades or one of the lowest grades on defense depending on the game.Kiser is the most productive out of the three given the amount of snaps he receives. Both Luifau and Bertrand nearly have double the amount of snaps.
Hes also the highest graded out of the three. Kiser would be indispensable. As would Bertrand and Liufau. But ND cant keep all three.
Liufau, for all his errors, believe it or not, is actually well regarded in the draft community. Bertrand is also well over 2,000 career snaps which is a lot of any college player. You can entice him with NIL to return, but at this point in his career, he has nothing left to prove and should begin his professional career.
The bolded, IMO; is based on his athleticism. He’d be a late Rounder or UDFA and seen as a promising project. I know injuries slowed his development but he is either making plays or making mistakes…no consistency. When looking at PFF grades, Marist has the biggest disparity w/ either one of the highest grades or one of the lowest grades on defense depending on the game.
Bertrand was slow but otherwise very good.I hope Kiser comes back, but I'm on the side of the coaches that he wasn't playing for a reason. Bertrand was all around better and Liafau was a havoc creating player in a front 7 that was lacking in that. Never going to chase away someone with Kisers experience, but I'm thinking he could be beaten out by Sneed, Audsberry, or Bowen as the year goes on.
To be fair, wasn't the concern with Smith centered around his time as an undersized linebacker? I think once he made the switch to safety everyone was pretty stoked about his play lolKiser conversations remind me a lot of the talk on IE about one Mister Harrison "Hayseed" Smith.
He was much maligned and picked on around here... until he wasn't.
I just got back from practicing solitary zen mediataion in Tibet... Does anyone know how ol' Hayseed's career panned out?
So you're okay with 3 or 4 missed plays for every disruptive play?Marist can make a play, Kiser cannot. There's havoc potential to his game. Marist isn't great either, but can at least be disruptive. JD >>> Marist > Kiser.
We need to break through the "can't make a play, but knows how to line up" LB run we've had for a decade, even if that means some young guys taking their lumps early on for a longer term pay off, or a hit or miss LB who can at least hit.
Why the italics?It's rather simple. Lberry doesn't want any LB on the roster that he personally can beat in the Oklahoma drill
Wasn't he a safety, then moved to LB, then back?To be fair, wasn't the concern with Smith centered around his time as an undersized linebacker? I think once he made the switch to safety everyone was pretty stoked about his play lol
Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk
I'm ok with the potential of disruption, and smartly using that person in the right spots to utilize their strengths. Perfect example is exactly who we're talking about - Marist on blitzes has caused the QB to break many times. You'll continue seeing more and more of the same from Sneed as well, even though he can't be played for 75 snaps.So you're okay with 3 or 4 missed plays for every disruptive play?
And he's that because the other two LBs are more valuable and they'd rather have JD and Marist on the field more. Al Golden isn't dumb, if Kiser wasn't the 3rd best, he'd be the Will or Mike.Kiser doesn't play as much as them because they are almost always in nickel which I know you know means the rover has to come off the field
YesWasn't he a safety, then moved to LB, then back?
People overrated "tackles". Much more important for LBs are "tackles and average yardage gained", "TFL", "Pressures", and "Havoc rate".the kiser supporters like to show his tackles per snaps, but it doesnt ever seem to come up that his position coach is our DC who is getting tons of praise and that he likely knows what the hell he is doing and could just maybe be putting Kiser in the most advantageous positions to succeed.
just a thought.