You were so spot on with your analysis in the '24 election, that I'm sure you'll nail everything this time around too.![]()
STRUGGLING™
I didn't conduct this poll doc.You were so spot on with your analysis in the '24 election, that I'm sure you'll nail everything this time around too.
In '24, you frequently quoted polls that were known to be biased and nothing more than "buy a result" pollsters. Despite being told more than once that most of the polls you quoted were essentially worthless, you continued, routinely misinterpreting what was actually happening, then got hammered pretty badly after the election for doing so. You have a track record of not being able to tell the difference between what is and what you want it to be when it comes to polls and politics in general.I didn't conduct this poll doc.
Also what analysis? I was pretty resigned to our fate after the Biden/Trump debate and Butler. I remmeber specifically talking with LAX about how picking Kamala was an auto loss.
Please show me a quality poll showing Paxton in the lead.In '24, you frequently quoted polls that were known to be biased and nothing more than "buy a result" pollsters. Despite being told more than once that most of the polls you quoted were essentially worthless, you continued, routinely misinterpreting what was actually happening, then got hammered pretty badly after the election for doing so. You have a track record of not being able to tell the difference between what is and what you want it to be when it comes to polls and politics in general.
I never said anything about Paxton. I simply pointed out that your track record on elections is quite bad.Please show me a quality poll showing Paxton in the lead.
First of all, what's the point of pointing out my supposed track record on predicting elections if you aren't calling into question the numbers that I'm currently posting?I never said anything about Paxton. I simply pointed out that your track record on elections is quite bad.
The second was a Marist poll showing Kamala +4. Which no one responded to."It's for sure an outlier and there's zero chance Kamala is winning Kansas. It is interesting though that it appears Trumps popularity in deep red states seems to be waning. He won Kansas by 21 points in 2016, 15 in 2020, and now seems to be even closer this election."
Not in the SPLC. I don't do that org.
What are they trying to distract us from now?

I'm not sure what all the fuss is over this particular sighting. It's an object that appears to be flying straight and level at 500 mph. We can't really tell anything about its shape, it's not maneuvering, and its performance is that of a cruise missile, a passenger jet, a subsonic jet fighter, or any of a dozen other mundane things.Yeah, I'm not sure I buy this one. Unless the zoom is constantly changing, how are they tracking that object along that trajectory for that long and it's not getting closer or farther away? Is it just doing circles around the camera? Something is off.
[EDIT] Watching it back it was probably filmed from one of our own aircraft which would explain a bit as it would also be in motion, but it would have to be flying in the exact same direction at a similar speed, basically parallel...but yeah...still feels like a distraction.
"No, Trump isn't running an Authoritarian government, 'you're batshit crazy!'"
View attachment 3064818
View attachment 3064817
It's not a right for them to be there, it's a privilege.
Authoritarian would be shutting them down completely. Keep clutching the pearls.