Politics

Politics

  • Obama

    Votes: 5 1.4%
  • Romney

    Votes: 172 48.7%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 13.0%
  • a:3:{i:1637;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:1637;s:6:"nodeid";s:7:"2882145";s:5:"title";s:5:"Obama";s:5:"

    Votes: 130 36.8%

  • Total voters
    353

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
32,296
Reaction score
18,814
Him and his tribe who think we should just let Iran have a nuke. This shit has a caucus in the democrat party. At least we know where he gets it.



Yeah, Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. They already use fear and subversion to influence neighbors and cause destruction, lets just let them have a nuke. That should make things better! :rolleyes:
 

NDWarrior

Well-known member
Messages
3,553
Reaction score
2,695
Him and his tribe who think we should just let Iran have a nuke. This shit has a caucus in the democrat party. At least we know where he gets it.


Your reply and interpretaion of what he's saying is "batshit crazy." He's simply outlining what has been around since the post-WWII era -- Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) and Detente.

It's world superpower strategy 101 and a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy.

And you don't even listen to the entire interview. He's saying Iran has simply been trying to join the club and play the game for leverage and influence in the area, but as he said, he's not advocating for Iran getting nukes, but he understands the country's strategy and the why behind it and that MAD and Detente do tend to bring stability to regions where there are nukes - Please see the Cold War era.

I don't follow Piker and this is the first time I've heard him speak but he obviously understands history and geo political strategy.

Before this latest war, I'll tell you one thing I've noticed about Iran. When they're hit - like when the Nukes bunkers were hit about 1.5 years ago and when Israel bombed them a few years back - they are very measured in their response... You can practically predict what they're going to do. A requisite retaliatory strike that's not very damaging. We saw this after both of these events and I would venture to guess is exactly why Trump and his team felt emboldened to strike the Iranian nukes back in April 2025. They took an informed and calculated gamble that Iran would bark back but not go full-on pit bull attack and they were right.

You guys blow everything up and exaggerate things.
 

Fbolt

I've been around
Messages
7,438
Reaction score
2,593
Your reply and interpretaion of what he's saying is "batshit crazy." He's simply outlining what has been around since the post-WWII era -- Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) and Detente.

It's world superpower strategy 101 and a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy.

And you don't even listen to the entire interview. He's saying Iran has simply been trying to join the club and play the game for leverage and influence in the area, but as he said, he's not advocating for Iran getting nukes, but he understands the country's strategy and the why behind it and that MAD and Detente do tend to bring stability to regions where there are nukes - Please see the Cold War era.

I don't follow Piker and this is the first time I've heard him speak but he obviously understands history and geo political strategy.

Before this latest war, I'll tell you one thing I've noticed about Iran. When they're hit - like when the Nukes bunkers were hit about 1.5 years ago and when Israel bombed them a few years back - they are very measured in their response... You can practically predict what they're going to do. A requisite retaliatory strike that's not very damaging. We saw this after both of these events and I would venture to guess is exactly why Trump and his team felt emboldened to strike the Iranian nukes back in April 2025. They took an informed and calculated gamble that Iran would bark back but not go full-on pit bull attack and they were right.

You guys blow everything up and exaggerate things.
Iran is measured in their response? How about the response comes from the US or Israel as their proxies typically hit either the US or Israel. You ever been on the wrong side of a KH or an SMG attack Mr Keyboard Warrior? Did not think so.
 

NDWarrior

Well-known member
Messages
3,553
Reaction score
2,695
Iran is measured in their response? How about the response comes from the US or Israel as their proxies typically hit either the US or Israel. You ever been on the wrong side of a KH or an SMG attack Mr Keyboard Warrior? Did not think so.
Stop changing the subject and stay focused Mr. ADHD. I'm simply saying before the war, Iran could be bombed and their response was predictable and relatively harmless. Since the war started in March, it's been a different story.

Now be a nice sniper who has used up his ammo for the day and crawl back into your cave.
 

Fbolt

I've been around
Messages
7,438
Reaction score
2,593
My cave? You mean real world, on the ground experience?

No changing the subject-I laughed at you stating they have measured responses-which, who fucking cares. It is predominantly the US and Israel responding to THEIR attacks. Talk about switching the narrative of what actually happens out there. If you knew-then you would know.

But you don't know. I pity you, fool!
 

Fbolt

I've been around
Messages
7,438
Reaction score
2,593
Stop changing the subject and stay focused Mr. ADHD. I'm simply saying before the war, Iran could be bombed and their response was predictable and relatively harmless. Since the war started in March, it's been a different story.

Now be a nice sniper who has used up his ammo for the day and crawl back into your cave.
I'm not a sniper, although 1700 yards is my longest shot.
 
Top