If you're referring to the new 5 for 5 rule implemented by the NCAA, then no its had very little if any impact thus far.
I wasn't referring to that. Just saying they probably promised early playing time. Im sure the staff knew that the new 5 for 5 rule was gonna be put in place well before June 23rd though
Early PT is always dangled by coaching staffs with the understanding that you must be good enough to force their hand. That isn't why recruiting is better.
Promising early playing time doesn’t fit the culture MF has built.
The difference is if you are good enough and earned reps you’ll play early under Freeman. Kelly on the other hand would play a walk on over a Freshman who deserved snaps
I believe II’s podcast said he had an injury that’s kept him behind. Maybe from high school or since enrolling.
Two totally different backs...Osborne is the agile back with elite jump cutting ability and excellent feet. Walton is more of the rugged throwback runner that moves the chains, excellent vision and top end speed but one cut and headed north.
Just remember what we stole out of Georgia in this class: Jonaz Walton and Bubba Frazier, two incredibly explosive players.
Both had offers from Georgia too.
I had thought that Seider was just trying to motivate Kedren Young with all of the Walton hype (similar builds and roles). That still could be true, but definitely not the whole picture. Looks like we may have something special with Jonaz.
Don’t forget Thomas Davis too. Not Georgia but had a Georgia offer and his dad is a Georgia legacy.
And not the 'Taylor Farms lettuce' type of explosive.
Matt Jefferey, for the win.
Put him at KR and Bubba at PR.
AKA, my diet method...
he fumbled at practice...
Oddly enough his vision is considered one of the two strongest parts of his game.
He Kelly were still coach that's the type of player he would stick back there😂
