K
koonja
Guest
Discuss.
I have BF3 currently...thinking about picking up the other one. What I have read is BF3 is very team based and highlights support roles vs the run and gun of MW. If you run around "Halo" style in BF3 you will not live long. BF3 is a great MP game, with huge maps, pretty realistic gun physics etc. Where it misses to date is, hit recognition, and spawn camping. Snipers also dominate in this game to an extent that pushes logic.
Where's the none in the poll?
This is basically what I've heard about BF3. Everyone seems to love it. Only bad thing I heard is that there are a few glitches in the game. Oh well, every game's going to have some glitches. I actually have never played any of the battlefields, always been a COD guy. Haven't bought either but will probably buy MW3.
skyrim
This year was my first dabble in BF3, as I was always a MW guy before. I will say this, if you play the Rambo style like in MW you won't last long. You really have to work as a Squad to experience all the nuances. I do like that Kill/Death Ratio is weighted less than what you do to help your squad. Depending on what class you play as, you can earn experience points by dropping ammo, identifying targets, reviving a fallen teammate, and a whole list of other things. This game is pretty epic, but I will also get MW to compare.
See all that sounds really sweet and something I'd be interested in. I'm one of those guys who will play domination but have an awful KD ratio but will have 4 or 5 captures and a handful of defends. The team aspect of it sounds very enticing. Hate learning new controls though for similar games.
I run a business, and after the time I spent playing oblivion, I may have to take vacation for this one.
See my problem is that I can't stand having to rely on my teammates that much. There were so many times in the beta where my teammates would do the rambo thing and it would screw me. I don't want to waste my time going through 3 matches before I find a group that actually plays the game well.
Yeah, I hear you. When I'm playing domination, securing/holding B is the only thing I worry about. Seems like every time I die (which is often) B is getting captured. I like playing with people who worry less about the KDR.
My opinion of today's FPS games.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/goiMExAZCko" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Gotta go with MW3, I enjoy the ideas of BF3 but the gameplay of MW3 is just so silky smooth. 60 fps on consoles is one sexy stat.
Too bad they're still using the MW1 engine...I already own 4 games that are hardly any different whatsoever from eachother. MW1 still plays better and feels more balanced than any CoD since.
That's why I am voting BF3...only because Skyrim isn't an option.
MW1 still plays better and feels more balanced than any CoD since.
I see no reason why this is an insult. Using the same engine is usually sign of comfort and leads to a well polished product. also, you say there has been no cod made so far that is better than 4, but the studio that actually MADE cod4 has only made one sequel since so you can't act like black ops and waw were real follow ups to cod4. infinity ward has only made mw2 and mw3 and since I doubt you've actually played mw3 (since it just came out) you're basing your opinion on one game, hardly a pattern of regression.
Neither.![]()