Now I didn't watch any of the Michigan game, but let's move on here. I checked their box score (I know you can't dwell on the box score, but let's face it, if it weren't for the total yardage difference between ND and USF, none of us would have ANY hope for this year. Thank you box score).
Things that stand out to me....
WM was right there with UM in total yardage...279 to 288, advantage UM.
WM QB went 22-31 for 183 yards, no TDs, one pick.
Denard went 9/13 for only 98 yards, no TDs or picks.
WM had a hard time running the ball against UM, which is evident in the 96 rushing yards and 3.8 average.
UM did well, 190 yards on the ground.
UM had three main runners: Shaw (4 carries, 13.5 yard average)
Denard: 8 carries, 5.8 yard average.
Their main back was Toussaint, who had 11 rushes for a 7.7 yard average.
HOWEVER, Shaw had one carry for 44 yards and Toussaint one for 43.
If you take those two runs away (I know this isn't exactly fair, but let's concentrate on the body of work not the big plays),
Toussaint only averaged 3.7 yards on his carries and Shaw a dreaded .4 yards per carry.
No UM receiver had more than 2 catches or 40 yards.
One player (J. White) seemed to carry the load receiving for WM. 12 catches for 119 yards.
Denard hit 6 different targets.
Thoughts?