...
In the Kim Dunbar incident who was the AD at the time cause the ad's i remember are that MORON white and Mr.Swarbrick
Mike Wadsworth was ND AD from 1995 to 2000.
...
In the Kim Dunbar incident who was the AD at the time cause the ad's i remember are that MORON white and Mr.Swarbrick
But it doesn't matter what SI, ESPN or Yahoo! report. It's what the NCAA can prove, and that task became much more difficult when Pryor bolted for the pros, freeing him from any obligation to cooperate with NCAA investigators. As of today, the NCAA has not notified the school of any additional allegations. If it does, the Aug. 12 hearing would presumably be delayed, and OSU would be given another opportunity to respond.
Until then -- if "then" even happens -- none of that other noise bears any relevance on the proceedings. The only charge of import is Tressel's lie, for which he will likely be given a healthy show-cause penalty. Theoretically, the Committee can still tack on extra charges (two scholarship reductions for each ineligible player used seems within the realm of possibility). But without a broader charge against the institution, Ohio State may very well escape the massive sanctions everyone seems to think are inevitable.
Mike Wadsworth was ND AD from 1995 to 2000.
My point was that you appeared to be going after Gene Smith, based on nothing. All the facts that are known are that Smith imposed a fine, and then rescinded it. There might be a perfectly good explanation for it. Do you think that's possible?
All I can tell you is to go back and look at all the statements made in the press by Smith and Gee. They should both be fired or penalized for illegal use of the mouth.
NCAA tells Ohio State it finds no new violations; won't face 'failure to monitor' charge | BuckeyeXtra
Ummmmm........ wow..... this is some serious bullshit if this stands.
I can understand the NCAA saying the Compliance Staff and the AD weren't involved but the head coach knew about it, failed to report it, covered it up, lied about, and made the pitch to get his boys reinstated for the bowl game.
If the head coach doesn't "monitor" who does? Who monitors a head coach?
I think that the NCAA looks at it as more "Are there processes in place, to keep tabs on what is happening?", as opposed to, "Did the compliance department uncover what the coaches/players were covering up?".
If the processes are in place, but fail to detect a problem because the coach lied, then why hammer the school? USC was hit because they had ONE person performing compliance functions. tOSU has one of the largest compliance staffs in the country. I think that the NCAA looks at it as: They are making an effort, but we can't expect them to hack into a coach's email account to ensure that there is nothing that the coach is hiding from them.
Tressel wasn't some Graduate Assistant making an honest but wrong mistake. Tressel was the highest paid employee of OSU with over 30 years of NCAA experience and he calculated how to cheat. AND OSU profited by it.
And Tressel is now unemployed. He still faces possible NCAA sanctions next month. If the NCAA wants to do the right thing, and send a strong message, they will ban Tressel from coaching or participating in any NCAA sponsored events.
And Tressel is now unemployed. He still faces possible NCAA sanctions next month. If the NCAA wants to do the right thing, and send a strong message, they will ban Tressel from coaching or participating in any NCAA sponsored events.