Some of these comments about Clausen are unbelieveable. I think his career was at the least a bit of a dissapointment. He was good passer, not great. And wasn't that great of a leader/field general. Was extremely immature(the fact that he left early when just about everyone knew he wasn't ready, really did it for me). Yes, he had gobs of talent, but didn't have the wins to show for it. You can blame defenses or whatever, but there are QB's with much less to work with, that won more than Jimmy did. And Weis can't be to blame either, he turned Brady Quinn from a 50% passer into a Heisman canidate.
I hate to rag on him, but it is what it is. Jimmy came in with all the high school accolades you could ask for, and an attitude (which isn't a bad thing all the time) but he never really hit that level. I'd say, B-, C+ career at ND. Leaving early (his CHOICE FYI, really cost him)
Quinn was a much better ND QB that didn't get the credit that he was due.
Now I'm gonna get slammed. But I'm sticking to my guns.
I wouldn't slam that opinion, and of course Clausen's career was a bit of a disappointment. But I don't really agree with your total assessment.
I would say Clausen was a great passer. If he wasn't, who is? He had great touch, supreme accuracy, and set the single-season quarterback rating in 2009.
Wasn't a great field general? Eh...pretty debatable there. He was thrown into the fire as a freshman and continued to get better every year. His attitude rubbed the people the wrong way, but I don't think there's any doubt he was a warrior on the field. Playing hurt all the time and especially during his last season shows a lot of heart, especially when he put the team on his shoulders every game.
Immature? Again, he had a personality that rubbed people the wrong way. I definitely thought he matured as he got older. Him leaving early has nothing to do with his maturity so I would just dismiss that argument. And did "everyone know" he wasn't ready for the NFL? Because I'm pretty sure that wasn't the case.
So yeah the wins aren't there and that will always be the knock on Clausen. But it really wasn't his fault in most respects.
How does Weis turning Quinn into a Heisman candidate absolve him from failing to develop the program from 2007 to 2009? That's the weirdest logic I've ever seen.
A B- career or C+ career is pretty harsh. It seems like you're bothered that he left early and that he was the No. 1 recruit and should have achieved more. That's fair enough, but he had a lot going against him that Quinn didn't.
Quinn had a quality run game, Clausen never did.
Quinn had a decent defense, Clausen had bad ones (including perhaps the worst ever in 2009).
Stuff like that matters. I'd probably take Quinn's career (who wouldn't?) but Clausen clearly showed to me that he was the more talented and clutch player. It didn't result in more wins but how can anyone knock him and blame him for the losses and so few wins against good teams?