5-for-5 Injunction

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
18,116
Reaction score
31,652
There was too many threads that are related but not really about this ongoing thing, but appears this is in doubt now:

 

NotKoon

Well-known member
Messages
401
Reaction score
872
Bud Elliot had an interesting tin foil hat take on this whole situation. Basically that the NCAA was expecting PSA to pass the senate and knew it would be a fight in the house. Therefore they purposely rolled out 5 for 5 in such a way and at such a time that would create these kind of legal challenges. Giving the NCAA a smoking crater to point at and declare the need for federal oversight
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,637
Reaction score
10,703
Football season starts in two weeks. Some fall sports have already started. Imagine trying to manage a roster like this? What a shitshow.
 

RudyVerse

Well-known member
Messages
1,003
Reaction score
1,808
It needs Federal oversight because the NCAA has been such a joke self-governing. Whether the right Federal oversight is applied is another question, but the NCAA opened this door wide open themselves.
 

Bane

Well-known member
Messages
2,411
Reaction score
5,006
Yeah, not gonna lie, CFB is sort of dead. I can't see myself still being a fan in a few years.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
45,628
Reaction score
21,454
And to think, this all started with simply wanting to let players get a free meal or get paid a few bucks for their name on a jersey.
 

Jimmy3Putt

KooL
Messages
6,159
Reaction score
7,349
Yeah, not gonna lie, CFB is sort of dead. I can't see myself still being a fan in a few years.

Not me, I’m loving this. It’s not the college football of my youth, but it stopped being that 25 years ago when they let the SEC start paying players without consequence.

At least now we have a real chance at winning it all.
 

greyhammer90

the drunk piano player
Messages
17,405
Reaction score
17,798
Except for conference realignment killing the geographic regionality of the sport and the creation of a obviously compromised committee to determine playoff at-larges, I like nearly every change to college football in recent years. I much prefer NIL and pay-for-play over the under the table stuff the sport was marred with for decades. I also like 5 for 5 over the redshirt/blackbox waiver system that never seemed to go our way. 10-15 players nationally getting to return to play for a 6th year one more time because the NCAA didn't extend the waiver they should've isn't going to cause me to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
 

Huntr

24 Karat Shamrock
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
11,214
I'm not that upset by these NFL guys being granted a year. I was riled up at 1st, but it's not that many and it's just this one class so they can get in on 5 for 5. There's been no indication this will be a thing going forward. I think it's less of an issue than I did at first glance.

Conference consolidation and realignment is about the only thing I hate about CFB right now. But, I've hated that since the Big 8 brought in the Texas schools and effectively died, so that's not new.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
18,116
Reaction score
31,652
This is a one off event so on some level the end of CFB talk is silly, the question is how many one off events do we keep having that the NCAA can do nothing about and what is the next one

I mean they got lucky with the Sorsby stuff in the end
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,637
Reaction score
10,703
All the NIL/transfer/whatnot stuff is largely noise that fades away once the games begin.

I think what risks damaging the sport most is if:
A: The middle-class P4 schools truly can't compete financially and it devolves into 25 powers and everyone else being cannon fodder. The fan bases of the cannon fodder will tune it out.
Or B: If the playoff gets so large it renders the regular season basically meaningless, like in college basketball and the NBA/NHL. That would suck.

We're potentially not far from either of those scenarios. But we haven't reached them yet.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
45,628
Reaction score
21,454
I'm not that upset by these NFL guys being granted a year. I was riled up at 1st, but it's not that many and it's just this one class so they can get in on 5 for 5. There's been no indication this will be a thing going forward. I think it's less of an issue than I did at first glance.

Conference consolidation and realignment is about the only thing I hate about CFB right now. But, I've hated that since the Big 8 brought in the Texas schools and effectively died, so that's not new.
That bothers me more than anything. It was exciting when these teams stepped out of conference to play a team from another conference. Now they play each other every year or so. The anticipation isn't at the same level.
 

SarasotaJoe

Member
Messages
31
Reaction score
11
Yeah, not gonna lie, CFB is sort of dead. I can't see myself still being a fan in a few years.
Think for a second how drastically it has changed over the past few years. You've got players working out with NFL teams, not making the cut, and then joining back on on college teams. My interest is diminishing. If they don't make some drastic changes, my Saturdays will be looking a lot more open.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,984
Reaction score
3,344
And to think, this all started with simply wanting to let players get a free meal or get paid a few bucks for their name on a jersey.

It all started with the first NCAA executive director Walter Byers trying to avoid paying death benefits to a widow. Even concocted a new labor class to do it.
 
Top